1,015 Florida cases classified under this topic, plus 1,841 listed through its narrower topics · sorted by citation count · see the citation graph · browse and sort
-
The court held that the prisoner's allegations of deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs were not frivolous and therefore the district court erred in dismissing the action with prejudice and denying leave to appeal in forma pauperis.
-
The court held that a rational trier of fact could not find the university's tenure decision irrational, and insufficient evidence was presented for the conspiracy claim.
-
The court held that a prisoner's claim of deliberate indifference by prison officials to an attack by another inmate can support a § 1983 action, and that the district court erred in dismissing claims against several defendants based on mere negligence.
-
The court held that the Government of the Virgin Islands and its officials could be held liable under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for reckless disregard of an inmate's safety, allowing judgments exceeding territorial tort claim limits.
-
The court held that the defendant's actions were not a significant contributing cause of the plaintiff's arrest, thus summary judgment was appropriate.
-
838 F.2d 977·
8th Cir.·
1988-02-03
·cited 6×
The court held that the Missouri tolling statute applies to a prisoner's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action, and the repeal of the civil death statute did not remove the disability of imprisonment for tolling purposes.
-
837 F.2d 1243·
5th Cir.·
1988-02-02
·cited 6×
The court held that the prisoner's claim was de minimis and failed to raise a constitutional issue, thus the dismissal as frivolous was proper.
-
835 F.2d 1173·
6th Cir.·
1987-12-29
·cited 6×
Police officers testifying before a grand jury are absolutely immune from liability for their testimony, and municipalities cannot be held liable under § 1983 on a respondeat superior theory.
-
The court held that while the employee's speech addressed a matter of public concern, it was not a substantial or motivating factor in the decision not to renew his contract, thus his First Amendment claim failed.
-
830 F.2d 576·
5th Cir.·
1987-10-22
·cited 6×
The court held that a public school teacher's college transcript is not protected by FERPA, and the public's interest in evaluating teacher competence outweighs the teacher's privacy interest in the transcript.
-
828 F.2d 1493·
10th Cir.·
1987-09-18
·cited 6×
The court held that the prison disciplinary board's decision to revoke good time credits was not supported by sufficient evidence, violating the plaintiff's due process rights.
-
The court held that a federal civil rights action was barred by a prior state court judgment that had already provided reinstatement and back pay, and that the city's denial of a residency waiver was not an unconstitutional arbitrary or capricious act.
-
827 F.2d 10·
6th Cir.·
1987-09-02
·cited 6×
The court held that general damages are appropriate in § 1983 actions for First Amendment violations when harm is likely but difficult to prove, and attorney fees were reasonable.
-
The court affirmed the grant of summary judgment for the officers but remanded the attorney's fees awards for both parties for reconsideration.
-
The court held that the Fourth Amendment, not the Eighth Amendment, governs claims arising from investigatory stops, and the reasonableness of the seizure is a jury question.
-
825 F.2d 1016·
6th Cir.·
1987-08-03
·cited 6×
The court held that the Medical Staff Administrative Committee's (MSAC) consideration of charges previously addressed in disciplinary proceedings was not barred by administrative res judicata, and that the MSAC hearing did not violate plaintiff's procedural due process rights.
-
821 F.2d 1120·
5th Cir.·
1987-07-17
·cited 6×
The court held that the inmate's pro se complaint sufficiently stated claims for relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and that these claims were not barred by the requirement to exhaust state remedies via habeas corpus.
-
The court held that a Title VII disparate impact claim cannot be asserted via a § 1983 action, but reversed the dismissal of the Equal Protection Clause claim due to evidentiary restrictions.
-
The court held that the evidence supported the jury's finding that the District Attorney's office's failure to have a procedure for canceling material witness warrants constituted a custom or policy that violated the plaintiff's constitutional rights, and that the jury's damage a
-
818 F.2d 21·
8th Cir.·
1987-05-11
·cited 6×
The court held that the inmate failed to prove an Eighth Amendment violation because the injury was accidental and the emotional harm was de minimis.
-
815 F.2d 1164·
8th Cir.·
1987-04-01
·cited 6×
The court should not have overruled the district court's decision regarding probable cause for arrest.
-
814 F.2d 461·
7th Cir.·
1987-03-18
·cited 6×
The court held that Illinois' blanket denial of bail to arrested parole violators pending their final revocation hearing likely violates the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
-
The court held that the district court improvidently granted the motion to strike the qualified immunity defense, and Officer Lombardo is entitled to assert this defense.
-
The court affirmed the award of attorney's fees and costs to the defendant under 42 U.S.C. § 1988, finding the plaintiff's civil rights action to be frivolous, unreasonable, and groundless.
-
The district court lacked subject matter jurisdiction under the Johnson Act to award damages for a state-approved utility rate, even if the rate was challenged due to a drought emergency.
-
The court held that the jury verdicts were inconsistent and that the evidence supported a finding for the plaintiff on both federal excessive force and state assault and battery claims, requiring a new trial.
-
The appeal of the denial of a preliminary injunction is dismissed as moot because the challenged ordinance was amended during the pendency of the appeal.
-
804 F.2d 525·
9th Cir.·
1986-09-30
·cited 6×
A waiver of a section 1983 claim is valid if voluntary, deliberate, and informed; here, the settlement agreement was entered into voluntarily despite allegations of duress and coercion.
-
The Tax Injunction Act and the doctrine of comity deprive federal courts of jurisdiction over actions challenging state tax collection, even when framed as civil rights claims, provided adequate state remedies exist.
-
791 F.2d 881·
11th Cir.·
1986-06-17
·cited 6×
The court should not have dismissed the case for failure to state a claim, as the plaintiff's allegations of gross negligence could constitute deliberate indifference.
-
The dissent argues that New York res judicata law does not preclude the plaintiff's section 1983 claim, and that the majority erred in considering the good-faith immunity defense.
-
785 F.2d 963·
11th Cir.·
1986-04-02
·cited 6×
The court held that while implicit exhaustion requirements can exist for § 1983 claims, the Medicaid Act does not contain such a requirement, and exhaustion of state judicial remedies is generally not required.
-
784 F.2d 1191·
4th Cir.·
1986-03-04
·cited 6×
The court should dismiss the action for want of a case or controversy under Article III of the Constitution.
-
The North Dakota parole scheme does not create a protected liberty interest, and therefore, a prisoner's claims of due process violations in parole denials are without merit.
-
The court held that the district court did not err in dismissing the pro se § 1983 suit as frivolous and in awarding attorneys' fees to the defendants.
-
777 F.2d 431·
8th Cir.·
1985-11-21
·cited 6×
The court held that a prisoner's due process rights are not violated by a state's administrative calculation of parole eligibility based on prior convictions, as long as a procedural avenue exists for the prisoner to challenge the accuracy of those convictions.
-
776 F.2d 1560·
2d Cir.·
1985-11-18
·cited 6×
The court held that principles of issue preclusion, derived from the prior state court judgment, required dismissal of the appellant's federal civil rights action.
-
The court held that the defendants' affidavits were insufficient to establish the absence of a genuine issue of material fact, and thus summary judgment was not warranted.
-
767 F.2d 489·
8th Cir.·
1985-07-12
·cited 6×
The court held that the executive secretary of the Board on Judicial Standards was entitled to qualified immunity because the plaintiff's allegations did not establish a violation of clearly established constitutional rights to privacy.
-
The court held that the amended complaint stated a valid claim against the prison guard, but the original complaint failed to state a claim against other defendants.
-
The court held that even if the appellees were state actors, they were entitled to absolute or qualified immunity from damages liability under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for their actions in investigating and sending a cease and desist letter regarding the unauthorized practice of law.
-
The court held that while procedural due process rights were violated by the housing authority's denial of hearings, the required hearings for initial applicants and program participants were less extensive than ordered by the trial court, and damages for mental suffering were no
-
749 F.2d 591·
10th Cir.·
1984-11-21
·cited 6×
The court held that the school boards and districts are arms of the state and thus immune from suit under the Eleventh Amendment.
-
-
The court held that the district court's finding that the package was still in the mail when seized was not clearly erroneous, and therefore the warrantless seizure violated Fourth Amendment principles.
-
The court held that the district court correctly applied collateral estoppel to preclude litigation of pre-confession beatings and did not err in directing a verdict for the Board of Police Commissioners due to lack of evidence of a pattern of misconduct.
-
The court held that a broad delegation of discretion to individual employees to exercise their judgment does not constitute an official policy sufficient to establish municipal liability under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
-
The court held that the retroactive cancellation of insurance coverage was voidable due to mutual mistake, and the insured's failure to provide prompt written notice was excused. The conditional portion of the settlement was deemed unreasonable.
-
734 F.2d 468·
2d Cir.·
1984-05-08
·cited 6×
Prevailing defendants under 42 U.S.C. § 1988 are entitled to attorney's fees only when the plaintiff's action is objectively frivolous, vexatious, or brought in bad faith.
-
728 F.2d 453·
10th Cir.·
1984-02-24
·cited 6×
A school principal without tenure does not have a constitutionally protected property interest in continued employment based solely on a series of one-year contracts, nor was a liberty interest impaired by the non-renewal decision.