HENRY JAMES STEVENS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 4th DCA | 1993-04-28
No. 92-1883
GLICKSTEIN, C.J., GUNTHER, J„ and WALDEN, JAMES H., Senior Judge, concur.
619 So. 2d 9 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1993) Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Henry James Stevens, was convicted of attempted first degree murder. Upon consideration we are of the opinion that Stevens has failed to demonstrate reversible error with regard to his first four points on appeal.

However, with reference to his fifth point which reads, “The trial court illegally sentenced Mr. Stevens to 35 years imprisonment followed by 15 years probation when the statute allows a maximum 40 year sentence or a life sentence”, the State concedes that this sentence was illegal and that same must be reversed and remanded for resentencing which may not exceed the statutory maximum term of 40 years. See Wright v. State, 600 So. 2d 11 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992).

Affirmed in part; reversed in part and remanded for further proceedings consistent herewith.

GLICKSTEIN, C.J., GUNTHER, J„ and WALDEN, JAMES H., Senior Judge, concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Prince C. Ferguson v. State, 804 So. 2d 411 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001)
    …te, 600 So. 2d 11 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992) (reversing sixty-year sentences for two first degree felonies that became life felonies due to the possession of a firearm, which could be punished by life or a term not exceeding forty years); Stevens v. State, 619 So. 2d 9 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993) (holding that sentence of thirty-five years in prison followed by fifteen years probation is illegal sentence where statute allowed statutory maximum term of forty years or life sentence). Due to a statutory anomaly at the time…
  • Jackson v. State, 636 So. 2d 1372 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994)
    …ing the duration of the order and any extensions, the recording and minimization of intercepted communications, periodic reports to the judge, and notice to affected persons. See [*1374] Rodriguez v. State, 297 So. 2d 15 (Fla.1974); Miller v. State, 619 So. 2d 9 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993). These statutes are exceptions to the federal and state constitutional rights to privacy and must be strictly construed. Copeland v. State, 435 So. 2d 842 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983). To that end, section 934.06 specifically prohibits th…
  • Geer v. State, 252 So. 3d 1186 (Fla. 2d DCA 2018)
    …(Fla. 2d DCA 2013); Hughes v. State, 22 So. 3d 132 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009); Steward v. State, 931 So. 2d 133 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006); Shortridge v. State, 884 So. 2d 321 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004); Brown v. State, 827 So. 2d 1054 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002); Miller v. State, 619 So. 2d 9 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993). SILBERMAN, VILLANTI, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw