1,055 Florida cases classified under this topic, plus 2,310 listed through its narrower topics · sorted by citation count · see the citation graph · browse and sort
-
858 F.2d 378·
7th Cir.·
1988-10-03
The court held that the officers had probable cause to detain the Macek boys, their brief separation from parents was constitutional, and Mrs. Macek voluntarily consented to the officer's entry into her home.
-
The court held that the case must be remanded to the district court for further factual development regarding the judge's actions and jurisdiction before determining immunity.
-
The court held that Michigan prison hearing officers are entitled to absolute judicial immunity for their official acts, affirming the grant of summary judgment.
-
The court held that a state's failure to certify grievance procedures does not create a cause of action, and prison officials may open incoming mail in the inmate's presence for security reasons.
-
The court held that Zenco did not possess a protectable property interest in the renewal of its municipal liquor license under Missouri law.
-
698 F. Supp. 871·
S.D. Fla.·
1988-03-31
The court held that homosexuals are not a suspect class for equal protection purposes and that the plaintiff failed to state a claim for due process violations. Claims against certain defendants were dismissed for failure to state a cause of action.
-
840 F.2d 638·
9th Cir.·
1988-03-09
The court held that the state agencies were not obligated by Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act to provide service payments for a mentally handicapped individual placed in a private facility of his choice, as he was not an "otherwise qualified handicapped individual" under sta
-
The court held that the plaintiffs were barred by collateral estoppel from relitigating issues already decided in a prior action against law enforcement officers, and that the temporary protective detention of minor children was a constitutional consequence of their mother's lawf
-
The court held that the district court erred in dismissing the pro se complaint for failure to state a cause of action, as the alleged conditions of confinement might constitute punishment violating due process rights.
-
The court held that the district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing the case without prejudice for failure to prosecute, as the plaintiff had not suffered prejudicial harm.
-
A white police officer sued the City of Riviera Beach and its officials under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 after being terminated allegedly due to reverse racial discrimination. A jury awarded $500,000 in compensatory damages and $40,000 in punitive damages. The court affirmed, holding that
-
The court held that the district court's finding of effective consent to search was not clearly erroneous, and that the plaintiffs failed to prove a county policy of warrantless searches.
-
The court affirmed the jury verdict, finding the case was fairly tried and the evidence did not mandate a judgment for the plaintiff.
-
The court held that the district court erred in finding a First Amendment violation and awarding damages, as the plaintiff's suspension was not based on symbolic speech related to pre-signed warrants, and punitive damages are not recoverable against a municipality.
-
The court held that the children's civil rights claims were properly dismissed, but remanded the case for a factual inquiry into their entitlement to attorney fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act.
-
662 F. Supp. 974·
S.D. Fla.·
1987-07-06
The court held that the § 1983 claims were not separate and independent from the state law claims, thus not removable under 28 U.S.C. § 1441(c).
-
The court held that a prisoner's pro se status does not exempt them from summary judgment rules, and the denial of jail privileges did not violate due process without a state-created liberty interest.
-
A judge is absolutely immune from liability for issuing a contempt order to enforce an administrative order concerning court personnel, as this is a judicial act not performed in the clear absence of jurisdiction.
-
The court held that while the claim based on the January 1981 evaluations is time-barred, the claim based on the April 1981 denial of tenure is not, as it constitutes a separate retaliatory act.
-
The court held that a prisoner's transfer between facilities does not implicate a liberty interest protected by the Due Process Clause absent a state statute or regulation creating such an interest, and that the plaintiff's unique circumstances justified disparate treatment under
-
The court held that the district court correctly dismissed the RICO, section 1983, and antitrust claims as vague and conclusory, and properly remanded the remaining claims to state court.
-
805 F.2d 1008·
11th Cir.·
1986-12-10
The court held that a post-deprivation hearing can cure procedural irregularities when state law provides adequate post-deprivation remedies, and that the plaintiff received such an adequate hearing.
-
648 F. Supp. 1103·
M.D. Fla.·
1986-10-03
A public employer may voluntarily adopt an affirmative action plan if it is narrowly tailored to remedy past discrimination, does not unnecessarily trammel the interests of non-minorities, and is temporary.
-
The court held that a preliminary injunction was properly granted because the Illinois rule prohibiting targeted direct mail advertising by attorneys likely violates the First Amendment, and the district court's findings were entitled to deference.
-
The court held that the plaintiff's claim was barred by res judicata because the issue of due process regarding the special assessment had been fully litigated in prior state and federal court actions.
-
794 F.2d 1123·
6th Cir.·
1986-07-08
The court held that it had interlocutory jurisdiction over certain portions of the district court's orders denying injunctive relief, but affirmed those denials due to the contractor's substantial completion of the work and the plaintiff's delay in seeking equitable relief.
-
A jury verdict based on a negligence theory cannot sustain a Fourteenth Amendment due process claim, and Fourth Amendment claims were abandoned.
-
The dissenting judge believes the majority erred by finding reversible error in a jury instruction that faithfully followed binding circuit precedent.
-
790 F.2d 328·
3d Cir.·
1986-05-05
The dissenting judge would affirm the district court's decision, finding a rational basis for the city's requirement that candidates be current in their property taxes.
-
The court held that the appointment of election officials in Walker County, Alabama, satisfied federal constitutional standards and Alabama law, as substantial Republican representation ensured bipartisanship and prevented fraud.
-
A federal court cannot relitigate libel issues already decided by state courts, and a Section 1983 action is not a proper avenue to challenge state court judgments when the proper remedy is appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court.
-
The court affirmed the award of attorneys' fees and costs to the prevailing plaintiffs in a § 1983 action, finding no abuse of discretion in the trial court's determination of prevailing party status, reasonable hours, rates, and enhancement for exceptional success. The court dis
-
The court held that the district court erred in granting summary judgment on the appellant's due process claim regarding the discontinuation of a commutation program, as the due process aspect was not fully developed.
-
The court held that the trial court did not err in submitting the issue of liability and qualified immunity to the jury, nor in denying motions for a new trial based on alleged judicial and counsel misconduct.
-
The court held that the imposition of a $1,000 attorney sanction was warranted and affirmed the district court's decision, while also awarding costs and attorney's fees for the appeal.
-
The court held that a prisoner has no reasonable expectation of privacy in his cell, thus the Fourth Amendment does not apply to cell searches.
-
The court held that the evidence was insufficient as a matter of law to support the jury's verdict that the plaintiff was denied relocation assistance as required by federal law.
-
763 F.2d 652·
4th Cir.·
1985-06-06
The court held that the defendants provided the minimal elements of due process and that the school board's decision had a rational basis, thus affirming the dismissal of the plaintiffs' claims.
-
The court affirmed the denial of temporary and preliminary injunctive relief, finding no abuse of discretion by the district court in deferring to prison officials' decisions on inmate placement.
-
The court affirmed the trial court's summary judgment, finding no error in the application of immunity or in the dismissal of antitrust and discrimination claims.
-
The court held that a pro se prisoner's complaint alleging excessive force and improper lockdown by a guard, even if poorly drafted, should not be dismissed at the pleading stage if it suggests a violation of federally protected rights.
-
The court held that an attorney appointed by a federal court cannot be sued under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 because such action is not taken under color of state law. The court also denied a petition for writ of prohibition and a request for interlocutory appeal.
-
The court held that even if a prison policy banning Black Panther literature was unconstitutional, the inmate could not recover damages because the loss of his transcript was not proximately caused by that policy, but by inadvertence or theft.
-
The court held that the district court erred by dismissing the section 1983 action outright instead of continuing the case to allow the inmate to exhaust administrative remedies as required by 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a)(1).
-
The court held that an inmate's administrative transfer to maximum security without a hearing does not violate the Due Process Clause.
-
The court held that collateral estoppel bars relitigation of claims already decided by state courts, and the state's interest in paternity suits does not violate constitutional rights.
-
737 F.2d 257·
2d Cir.·
1984-06-15
The court held that Dr. Rand received constitutionally adequate notice and opportunity to be heard, thus satisfying due process requirements.
-
Firefighters demoted without notice or hearing had a property interest in their ranks protected by due process, and their promotions were not invalidated by a prior court ruling concerning other demotions.
-
The court held that the Eighth Amendment does not apply to civil license revocation proceedings and that claims were barred by res judicata and the Eleventh Amendment.
-
The court held that a guardian for minor children lacked standing to bring a Section 1983 action based on the deceased father's alleged constitutional rights violations.