1,055 Florida cases classified under this topic, plus 2,310 listed through its narrower topics · sorted by citation count · see the citation graph · browse and sort
-
A prisoner with three prior frivolous or malicious lawsuits sought to proceed in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), arguing that counting pre-PLRA dismissals violated the Ex Post Facto Clause and that he qualified for the imminent danger exception. The Eleventh Circuit hel
-
The court held that the trial judge erred in submitting the due process liberty interest claim to the jury because there was no evidence to support it.
-
The admission of a letter, written six months after the alleged incident, as evidence of a conspiracy to fabricate brutality charges was reversible error because its context and admissibility were not properly established.
-
The court held that attorneys' fees awarded under 42 U.S.C. § 1988 are not barred by the Eleventh Amendment, nor are they precluded by the fact that the prevailing party's counsel is a state-funded legal aid organization. The court also found that challenges to the amount of the
-
-
The dissent argues that the exhaustion requirement of 28 U.S.C. § 2254 does not apply to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 actions seeking monetary damages, even if the claim relates to the validity of good-time credit deprivation.
-
731 F.2d 465·
8th Cir.·
1984-03-23
·cited 57×
-
The court held that while some prison conditions did not violate the Eighth Amendment or prior injunctions, others, particularly concerning punitive isolation and mail processing, required further consideration or reversal.
-
Antonio May died in Fulton County Jail on September 11, 2018, following an altercation with officers during which he was restrained and subjected to physical force while experiencing acute methamphetamine intoxication and psychological distress. The Eleventh Circuit affirmed the
-
The district court did not err in denying the county officials' motion for summary judgment based on qualified immunity without prejudice, as a genuine issue of material fact exists regarding whether the employee's statements impaired his ability to carry out his duties and the d
-
The district court did not abuse its discretion in finding that the second amendment to the complaint would be futile, and therefore, further proceedings would be a waste of resources.
-
An order resolving all issues except attorney's fees is a final, appealable order, even if the fees have not yet been awarded.
-
566 F.2d 1334·
9th Cir.·
1977-12-14
·cited 56×
The court held that the plaintiffs lacked standing to challenge the height limitation and pre-1971 hiring procedures. The court also found that the attempted use of the 1972 examination was a Title VII violation, but the imposition of hiring quotas was not warranted.
-
506 F.2d 1028·
5th Cir.·
1975-01-09
·cited 56×
The court held that the NCAA's 1.600 rule was constitutional and that its actions were taken under color of state law, conferring jurisdiction.
-
496 F.2d 623·
2d Cir.·
1973-12-04
·cited 56×
The dissent argues that tax exemptions for private charitable foundations do not constitute government action, and therefore, these foundations are not subject to civil rights suits for their grant-making decisions.
-
216 F.2d 709·
1st Cir.·
1954-11-09
·cited 56×
The court held that the complaint failed to state a claim under the Civil Rights Act for conspiracy to deprive the plaintiff of equal protection of the laws.
-
The court held that it has jurisdiction to review the denial of qualified immunity even when factual disputes exist, and that the superintendent's failure to act on known medical deficiencies could constitute deliberate indifference, but the attending physician's actions did not
-
904 F.2d 661·
11th Cir.·
1990-07-02
·cited 55×
The Civil Rights Restoration Act does not apply retroactively to Lussier's claim, and individual defendants may be shielded by qualified immunity.
-
The court held that an inmate's release from close management and settlement of damages did not moot his claim because it was capable of repetition yet evading review, and that state policies created a liberty interest protected by due process.
-
775 F.2d 859·
7th Cir.·
1985-10-28
·cited 55×
The court held that Shondel lacks standing to sue based on the violation of her stepfather's constitutional rights.
-
712 F.2d 339·
8th Cir.·
1983-07-11
·cited 55×
The dissenting judge believes the district court properly granted judgment n.o.v. and would remand for a new trial on damages if liability is assumed.
-
The court held that the officer was entitled to qualified immunity because the law was not clearly established that he violated the Fourth Amendment by using deadly force without a warning in these specific circumstances.
-
Deborah Rice-Lamar, an African-American female Affirmative Action Specialist for the City of Fort Lauderdale, was discharged after refusing to remove personal commentary from her 1996 Affirmative Action Report despite supervisory instructions to do so. The Eleventh Circuit affirm
-
The court held that prior precedent improperly granted Eleventh Amendment immunity to Alabama county sheriffs without a proper analysis of state funding for judgments.
-
The court held that the City failed to preserve most of its challenges to jury instructions and sufficiency of evidence due to procedural defaults, and that any errors in the qualified immunity instruction were harmless.
-
616 F.2d 305·
7th Cir.·
1980-02-19
·cited 54×
The court held that the district court properly applied class action settlement principles to approve the desegregation settlement agreement, and that such settlements are permissible even after a finding of liability.
-
The court held that the jury instructions adequately covered the qualified immunity defense, and that sufficient evidence supported the jury's finding of cruel and unusual punishment and the awarded damages.
-
The court held that the plaintiff's claims for false imprisonment, assault and battery, and slander were barred by the statute of limitations because the summons was not issued within the one-year period, and the malicious prosecution claim failed for lack of evidence that the de
-
590 F.2d 87·
4th Cir.·
1978-12-18
·cited 54×
The court held that a private action under § 504 of the Rehabilitation Act for employment discrimination is barred unless providing employment is a primary objective of the federal financial assistance, and that the nursing home's receipt of federal funds and state regulation did
-
-
446 F.2d 1239·
6th Cir.·
1971-08-17
·cited 54×
The court held that the plaintiff's amended complaint failed to state a cause of action under the Civil Rights Act or the Sherman and Clayton Acts due to conclusional allegations and lack of factual support.
-
446 F.2d 806·
7th Cir.·
1971-07-01
·cited 54×
The court held that a probationary instructor whose contract is not renewed is entitled to a statement of reasons and a hearing as a matter of procedural due process.
-
The court held that while punitive damages may be appropriate, appellate courts cannot mandate their award, as this is a discretionary decision for the fact finder. The majority's imposition of punitive damages constituted an abuse of discretion.
-
805 F.2d 962·
11th Cir.·
1986-12-09
·cited 53×
The court held that a public censure resolution by a city council, if retaliatory, can violate First Amendment rights and procedural due process, but not the Sixth Amendment or the prohibition against bills of attainder if it lacks the force of law.
-
The dissenting judge believes the Illinois Criminal Code and Mental Health Code provide sufficient due process for individuals found unfit to stand trial, making additional federal due process requirements unnecessary.
-
-
522 F.2d 357·
8th Cir.·
1975-09-04
·cited 53×
A prison regulation prohibiting inmates from wearing long braided hair is unconstitutional under the First Amendment's Free Exercise Clause if it is not narrowly tailored to serve compelling governmental interests.
-
431 F.2d 660·
5th Cir.·
1970-09-09
·cited 53×
Judges and prosecuting attorneys are immune from civil liability under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for actions taken within their official capacities, and a private citizen cannot be held liable for conspiring with immune officials.
-
919 F.2d 1531·
11th Cir.·
1990-12-27
·cited 52×
Sheriff Strickland is entitled to qualified immunity because the arresting officers had probable cause to arrest the Huttons for trespass under clearly established law. However, he was properly denied absolute immunity.
-
The court held that the employee's speech, primarily concerning internal grievances and not a matter of public concern, was not constitutionally protected under the First Amendment, and therefore his demotion did not violate his free speech rights.
-
742 F.2d 350·
7th Cir.·
1984-08-17
·cited 52×
The court affirmed the grant of summary judgment for the defendants on the plaintiffs' First Amendment and due process claims, but remanded the case for further consideration of the award of attorneys' fees.
-
715 F.2d 971·
5th Cir.·
1983-09-26
·cited 52×
The court held that a claim of "work load discrimination" alone is not actionable under the Equal Pay Act, but remanded the Equal Pay Act claim to consider if unequal pay for equal work was alleged. The court also remanded the Title VII claim to determine if a continuing violatio
-
A district court may dismiss an action sua sponte before issuing summonses only if it clearly lacks subject matter jurisdiction. Otherwise, proper procedural steps, including summons issuance, must be followed.
-
633 F.2d 844·
9th Cir.·
1980-12-05
·cited 52×
A judge loses judicial immunity when acting in the clear and complete absence of personal jurisdiction or when engaging in a private agreement to predetermine a case's outcome. Private parties conspiring with a judge do not enjoy derivative immunity.
-
617 F.2d 1386·
9th Cir.·
1980-05-07
·cited 52×
Officials who discriminate invidiously are not entitled to good faith immunity in an action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and sufficient evidence supported the jury's finding of discriminatory intent and damages.
-
A pro se prisoner's complaint alleging a physician ignored warnings of an allergic reaction and persisted in prescribing the offending medication, causing aggravation, is not frivolous and warrants further proceedings against the physician.
-
The court, in part, affirmed the dismissal of the action against the City of Oklahoma City and the Chief of Police, finding the complaint did not state a civil rights cause of action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
-
324 F.2d 450·
9th Cir.·
1963-10-28
·cited 52×
The court held that a complaint alleging police officers took and distributed nude photographs of a citizen over her objection, acting under color of authority, states a claim for deprivation of privacy under the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause, thus establishing federa
-
903 F.2d 49·
1st Cir.·
1990-04-30
·cited 51×
A public employee's association with a politically disfavored individual, without more, does not implicate the First Amendment unless the employee's own political beliefs or advocacy are involved.
-
803 F.2d 1135·
11th Cir.·
1986-11-10
·cited 51×
The court affirmed the finding of illegal discrimination and most damages, but vacated punitive damages against some officials and reduced back pay. The court also affirmed the denial of punitive damages against the City and the directed verdict on the Section 1983 claim.