Temporary Mandatory Injunction

14 Florida cases classified under this topic · sorted by citation count · see the citation graph · browse and sort

• Wilson v. Sandstrom
  317 So. 2d 732· Fla.· 1975-07-21 ·cited 102×
  Greyhound kennel owners were incarcerated for civil contempt after refusing to comply with a temporary mandatory injunction requiring them to supply racing greyhounds to a track operator. The Florida Supreme Court upheld the injunction and contempt convictions, holding that a tem
• Hiles v. Auto Bahn Fed'n, Inc.
  498 So. 2d 997· Fla. 4th DCA· 1986-12-10 ·cited 79×
  Peter Hiles and Auto Bahn Sales and Leasing, Inc. appealed from an interlocutory order granting a temporary mandatory injunction that prevented disposal of corporate assets. The Fourth District Court of Appeal reversed, holding that the appellees failed to demonstrate the prerequ
• Dania JAI Alai Int'l, Inc. v. Murua
  375 So. 2d 57· Fla. 4th DCA· 1979-09-26 ·cited 43×
  A professional jai alai player sought reinstatement after being fired, obtaining a temporary mandatory injunction requiring his immediate reinstatement with back pay. The appellate court reversed, holding that breach of an employment contract does not ordinarily justify mandatory
• ST. Lawrence Co., N.V. v. Alkow Realty, Inc.
  453 So. 2d 514· Fla. 4th DCA· 1984-08-01 ·cited 24×
  A temporary mandatory injunction freezing $250,000 in sale proceeds to secure a brokerage commission claim was reversed because an action for money damages on an oral contract does not qualify for equitable relief merely because collectibility is uncertain.
• Bailey v. Christo
  453 So. 2d 1134· Fla. 1st DCA· 1984-06-29 ·cited 19×
  Bailey appeals a preliminary injunction ordering him to open and operate the Spinnaker II nightclub and pay stipulated percentages of gross revenues to himself and co-owner Christo during the 1984 season. The court affirmed, holding that the trial court did not abuse its discreti
• Goldberger v. Regency Highland Condo. Ass'n, Inc.
  383 So. 2d 1173· Fla. 4th DCA· 1980-06-04 ·cited 16×
  A temporary mandatory injunction was improperly issued without bond, as the alleged injuries were not irreparable and the procedural requirements for waiving the bond were not met.
• People's Tr. Ins. Co. v. Parvin Nowroozpour and Parviz Nowroopour
  277 So. 3d 135· Fla. 4th DCA· 2019-08-07 ·cited 9×
  An insurer may enforce appraisal and repair provisions of an insurance policy through a counterclaim for specific performance, even after the insureds file suit, though a request for temporary injunction must be dismissed if it fails to allege irreparable harm.
• Minneapolis & ST. L. Ry. Co. v. Pac. Gamble Robinson Co. (Jaeche
  181 F.2d 812· 8th Cir.· 1950-05-12 ·cited 8×
  The court held that the appeal should be dismissed as moot because the underlying dispute has been resolved and the injunction's requirements have been met.
• Dubner v. Ferraro
  242 So. 3d 444· Fla. 4th DCA· 2018-04-11 ·cited 7×
  A temporary mandatory injunction must comply with Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.610(c) by including specific findings for each element of the injunction standard, must include a bond absent recognized exceptions, and must be supported by evidence of irreparable harm and a sub
• Calder Race Course, Inc. v. Gaitan
  393 So. 2d 15· Fla. 3d DCA· 1980-12-16 ·cited 4×
  Calder Race Course appeals from an order granting trainer Frank Gaitan a temporary mandatory injunction requiring the race course to provide him with horse stalls. The court reverses, holding that despite state regulation of pari mutuel racing, private race tracks remain private
• Xbto Mining, LLC v. Crypto Caverns LLC
  Fla. 3d DCA· 2024-06-19
  A trial court does not abuse its discretion in granting a temporary mandatory injunction when the record supports the required elements.
• Clemente v. B & B Chem. Co., Inc.
  480 So. 2d 257· Fla. 3d DCA· 1985-12-31
  The Florida District Court of Appeal reversed two non-final injunctive orders issued by the trial court in an environmental enforcement action brought by Dade County's DERM against B & B Chemical Company and its officers. The court held that the trial court lacked authority to en
• S. Bell Tel. & Tel. Co. v. Stradco, Inc.
  44 Fla. Supp. 41· Duval Cty. Cir. Ct.· 1976-05-27
  Southern Bell Telephone sought a temporary mandatory injunction to repossess telephone equipment from three corporate defendants who refused to pay arrears of approximately $7,250.67 and prevented company access to the equipment. The court granted the injunction, and after the de
• State ex rel. Rd. Dep't v. S. Bell Tel. & Tel. Co.
  4 Fla. Supp. 1· Duval Cty. Cir. Ct.· 1953-05-26
  Southern Bell sought relief from a mandatory injunction requiring it to remove and relocate its telephone facilities from a state highway construction project. The court granted the State Road Department's motion to strike Southern Bell's affirmative defenses and held that Southe