XBTO MINING, LLC
v.
CRYPTO CAVERNS LLC
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A trial court does not abuse its discretion in granting a temporary mandatory injunction when the record supports the required elements.
[1] A trial court's grant of a temporary mandatory injunction is reviewed for abuse of discretion, with factual findings reviewed for competent, substantial evidence and lega…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“We review a trial court's factual findings on the elements of a claim for a temporary injunction for competent, substantial evidence, and we review its legal conclusions de novo. To the extent the decision to enter a temporary injunction involves an exercise of discretion, we defer to the trial court unless it has abused its discretion.”
Standard of review for temporary injunction orders
XBTO Mining and Crypto Caverns were parties to a dispute in which the trial court granted a temporary mandatory injunction in favor of Crypto Caverns.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Temporary Mandatory Injunction cases and more on FLexlaw
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed June 19, 2024. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D23-1849 Lower Tribunal No. 23-21613 ________________
XBTO Mining, LLC, Appellant,
vs.
Crypto Caverns, LLC, Appellee.
An Appeal from a non-final order from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, David C. Miller, Judge.
Michael P. De Simone (West Palm Beach), for appellant.
Padula Bennardo Levine, LLP, and Joshua S. Widlansky (Boca Raton), for appellee.
Before LOGUE, C.J., and SCALES and GORDO, JJ.
GORDO, J.
2
XBTO Mining, LLC (“XBTO”) appeals a non-final order of temporary mandatory injunction in favor of Crypto Caverns, LLC (“Crypto Caverns”). We have jurisdiction. Fla. R. App. P. 9.130(a)(3)(B). We affirm as we find the trial court did not abuse its discretion in granting the temporary mandatory injunction. See Law Offs. of Kravitz & Guerra, P.A. v. Brannon, 338 So. 3d 1022, 1023 (Fla. 3d DCA 2022) (“We review a trial court's factual findings on the elements of a claim for a temporary injunction for competent, substantial evidence, and we review its legal conclusions de novo. To the extent the decision to enter a temporary injunction involves an exercise of discretion, we defer to the trial court unless it has abused its discretion.” (quoting Fla. Dep't of Health v. Florigrown, LLC, 317 So. 3d 1101, 1110 (Fla. 2021))). Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Amnesia Int'l, LLC v. City of Miami Beach, 338 So. 3d 1022 (Fla. 3d DCA 2023)