-
942 F.2d 585·
9th Cir.·
1991-04-17
·cited 4×
The court held that the evidence was sufficient to support the conviction for presenting false claims, that the statute does not require an offsetting undercharge, and that the expert witness was qualified.
-
930 F.2d 142·
2d Cir.·
1991-04-04
·cited 4×
The court held that the government need not prove the defendant knew his actions would directly deprive the government of lawful duties under 18 U.S.C. § 542.
-
926 F.2d 969·
10th Cir.·
1991-02-22
·cited 4×
The court held that the government need not prove authorship of threatening communications under 18 U.S.C. § 876, only that the defendant knowingly caused their delivery.
-
883 F.2d 1362·
7th Cir.·
1989-09-11
·cited 4×
The court affirmed the conviction, holding that the evidence was sufficient for a jury to find that the defendant possessed the requisite fraudulent intent to defeat bankruptcy laws and that the transfers of property were fraudulent.
-
870 F.2d 1039·
5th Cir.·
1989-04-26
·cited 4×
The court held that the denial of habeas relief on the sufficiency of the evidence claim was affirmed, but the denial of relief on the multiple offender adjudication claim was reversed and remanded.
-
826 F.2d 766·
8th Cir.·
1987-08-17
·cited 4×
The court held that the admission of evidence of prior fires, insufficient evidence, and refusal of a jury instruction did not violate due process, and an evidentiary hearing was not required.
-
763 F.2d 9·
1st Cir.·
1985-05-23
·cited 4×
The court held that the evidence was sufficient to support the conviction and that the defendant was not unconstitutionally deprived of counsel when his sentence was reduced, as the reduction was based on a prior hearing where he was represented.
-
742 F.2d 538·
9th Cir.·
1984-09-11
·cited 4×
The court held that the trial court erred in considering a motion for acquittal as a pre-trial motion under the Speedy Trial Act, requiring remand to determine dismissal with or without prejudice.
-
743 F.2d 511·
7th Cir.·
1984-09-06
·cited 4×
The court affirmed the defendant's convictions, finding no abuse of discretion in the trial scheduling, sufficient evidence to support the verdict, and no errors in jury instructions.
-
632 F.2d 969·
2d Cir.·
1980-09-02
·cited 4×
The court held that Sigety's incarceration for civil contempt did not violate his Fifth Amendment rights because his testimony was not incriminating, and his due process claims were also without merit.
-
883 F.2d 1484·
10th Cir.·
1989-08-25
·cited 3×
The court held that 18 U.S.C. § 245(b)(2)(C) is constitutional as applied, that prior RICO convictions do not bar prosecution under this statute, and that the prosecutor's comment on post-arrest silence, while regrettable, did not warrant reversal.
-
854 F.2d 703·
5th Cir.·
1988-08-26
·cited 3×
The court held that the evidence was sufficient to support the convictions for federal banking law violations, and that the defendants' Sixth Amendment rights were not violated by restrictions on cross-examination.
-
994 F.2d 609·
9th Cir.·
1993-09-02
·cited 2×
The court held that the evidence was sufficient to prove knowledge for wiretap disclosure and that the jury instruction on knowledge was proper, rejecting the First Amendment challenge.
-
997 F.2d 1076·
4th Cir.·
1993-06-29
·cited 2×
The court held that the evidence was sufficient to support Luvenia Winfield's convictions for money laundering and conspiracy to obstruct currency transaction reporting, but insufficient to support Roosevelt Winfield's conviction for conspiracy to obstruct currency transaction re
-
988 F.2d 1509·
7th Cir.·
1993-03-19
·cited 2×
The court held that a detective's testimony regarding his general distrust of defense attorneys was admissible for rehabilitation, and that the evidence was sufficient to support the mail fraud conviction but not the VIN alteration conviction for one defendant.
-
987 F.2d 564·
9th Cir.·
1993-02-18
·cited 2×
The court held that a prior plea agreement did not bar subsequent prosecution for uncharged conduct, collateral estoppel did not apply to distinct conspiracy and substantive charges, and that certain defendants required resentencing due to the district court's failure to make exp
-
977 F.2d 1323·
9th Cir.·
1992-10-20
·cited 2×
The court held that while the admission of the false driver's licenses was an error, it was harmless because the other evidence against the defendant was substantial.
-
960 F.2d 751·
8th Cir.·
1992-04-03
·cited 2×
The court affirmed the dismissal of the federal habeas petition, finding no merit to the petitioner's claims of ineffective assistance of counsel, constitutional violations, or jurisdictional defects.
-
954 F.2d 1501·
9th Cir.·
1992-01-27
·cited 2×
The court held that the trial court did not err in denying the petition for a writ of habeas corpus, affirming the conviction.
-
945 F.2d 1302·
5th Cir.·
1991-10-16
·cited 2×
The court affirmed the conviction for possession with intent to distribute and the denial of the motion for a new trial, but affirmed the acquittal on the conspiracy charge, suggesting en banc review for the latter.
-
936 F.2d 406·
9th Cir.·
1991-06-10
·cited 2×
The court held that the district court did not err in denying motions to suppress wiretap evidence, sever counts, admit certain testimony, strike an overt act, or furnish the trial transcript to the jury. However, a technical violation of Rule 32(c)(3)(D) occurred.
-
928 F.2d 7·
1st Cir.·
1991-03-13
·cited 2×
The court held that evidence of other alleged bad acts was admissible under Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b) to rebut the defendant's claims of proper conduct and that the statute of limitations did not bar the embezzlement conviction as the jury could find the crime was completed
-
913 F.2d 365·
7th Cir.·
1990-09-10
·cited 2×
The court affirmed the defendant's convictions, finding sufficient evidence, no plain error regarding a witness's mention of prior imprisonment, and no Brady violation.
-
865 F.2d 1173·
10th Cir.·
1989-01-20
·cited 2×
The court held that the trial court did not err in denying the motion to sever or the motion to query jurors without a hearing, and that sufficient evidence supported the conviction.
-
716 F.2d 248·
4th Cir.·
1983-08-31
·cited 2×
The court held that admitting the privileged statements of the defendant's wife into evidence was reversible error, and the error was not harmless.
-
987 F.2d 354·
6th Cir.·
1993-02-26
·cited 1×
The court held that evidence of prior bad acts is admissible to show intent under Fed.R.Evid. 404(b) if its probative value outweighs prejudice under Fed.R.Evid. 403, and that the prosecution need not prove state law, only facts.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-03-28
The court denied the petition for writ of habeas corpus, finding no basis for relief under AEDPA standards.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2023-10-25
An inmate convicted of burglary in Duval County, Florida filed a federal habeas corpus petition raising seven grounds for relief, including claims of insufficient evidence, ineffective assistance of counsel, and sentencing errors. The district court denied the petition, finding t
-
M.D. Fla.·
2023-06-09
Chris Leonard Thornes, an inmate in Florida's prison system, filed a federal habeas corpus petition challenging his 2014 conviction for aggravated assault and possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, raising claims including insufficient evidence and ineffective assistance o
-
M.D. Fla.·
2023-05-10
The court denied the habeas corpus application because the state court's decisions were not contrary to or an unreasonable application of federal law, nor based on an unreasonable factual determination.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2023-02-14
Pasquale Morganti, a Florida inmate, filed a federal habeas petition challenging his 2013 convictions for burglary and grand theft, raising nine claims including allegations of insufficient evidence, ineffective assistance of trial and appellate counsel, and various trial errors.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2022-03-24
The court denied the petition for a writ of habeas corpus, finding the claims either procedurally barred or without merit under AEDPA standards.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2022-01-31
The court denied the petition for a writ of habeas corpus, finding all grounds procedurally barred or meritless.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2020-06-16
The court held that the petitioner's claim regarding the information being filed in bad faith was procedurally defaulted and unexhausted, and alternatively, the information provided adequate notice. The court also held that the petitioner's sentence was a lawful enhancement as a
-
M.D. Fla.·
2020-02-12
The court held that the petitioner failed to demonstrate that the state court's adjudication of his claims was contrary to or an unreasonable application of federal law, and thus denied the petition for habeas corpus relief.
-
242 So. 3d 1100·
Fla. 2d DCA·
2018-03-07
The circuit court's conviction and judgment are affirmed.
-
1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17834·
M.D. Fla.·
1998-11-06
The federal court denied Petitioner's habeas corpus petition, finding all grounds procedurally barred or without merit.
-
998 F.2d 671·
9th Cir.·
1993-07-06
The court held that 18 U.S.C. § 1954 does not require proof that the defendant knew his conduct was illegal, only that he received a thing of value because of his fiduciary position. The court also found sufficient evidence to support the embezzlement conviction.
-
991 F.2d 1218·
5th Cir.·
1993-05-27
A federal court on habeas review may consider a confession admitted at trial, even if a state appellate court later held it inadmissible under state law, provided its admission did not violate federal constitutional standards.
-
990 F.2d 244·
6th Cir.·
1992-12-28
The court held that the trial judge did not err in limiting the scope of cross-examination of a government agent, refusing to instruct the jury on certain defenses, or in finding sufficient evidence to support the conviction.
-
973 F.2d 684·
8th Cir.·
1992-08-31
The court held that a state law corroboration requirement is not cognizable on federal habeas review, and that sufficient evidence supported the conviction and the denial of a new trial motion.
-
963 F.2d 216·
8th Cir.·
1992-05-01
The court held that the evidence was sufficient to support the conviction and that the petitioner failed to establish prejudice from counsel's alleged errors.
-
935 F.2d 775·
6th Cir.·
1991-06-07
The court held that the evidence was constitutionally insufficient to support a conviction for criminal recklessness under the applicable statute.
-
934 F.2d 440·
2d Cir.·
1991-05-30
The court held that there was sufficient evidence to support the convictions for conspiring and endeavoring to obstruct justice, and that the indictment was valid despite the grand jury presentation methods used.
-
935 F.2d 96·
6th Cir.·
1991-05-28
The court affirmed the convictions but vacated the sentences, remanding for resentencing with instructions to apply specific Sentencing Guidelines provisions.
-
917 F.2d 1138·
8th Cir.·
1990-10-31
The court affirmed the denial of the habeas corpus petition and Rule 60(b) motion, finding that the claims constituted an abuse of the writ because they were deliberately withheld from a prior petition.
-
868 F.2d 265·
8th Cir.·
1989-02-10
The court affirmed the district court's dismissal of the habeas corpus petition, finding competency claims without merit and other claims barred by procedural default.