Sufficiency Of Evidence Standard (Jackson V. Virginia)

198 Florida cases classified under this topic · sorted by citation count · browse and sort

• United States v. Floyd
  882 F.2d 235· 7th Cir.· 1989-08-10 ·cited 12×
  The court held that the evidence was sufficient to support the embezzlement conviction and that the defendant failed to demonstrate actual prejudice from preindictment delay.
• United States v. Aceves-Rosales
  832 F.2d 1155· 9th Cir.· 1987-11-18 ·cited 12×
  The court held that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in excluding a medical record due to late disclosure under Fed.R.Crim.P. 16, and that sufficient evidence supported the conviction for assault with a deadly weapon.
• United States v. Udom Walitwarangkul
  808 F.2d 1352· 9th Cir.· 1987-01-26 ·cited 12×
  Possession of a locked container with contraband, combined with other circumstantial evidence, can be sufficient for a jury to infer knowing possession.
• United States v. Tomasian
  784 F.2d 782· 7th Cir.· 1986-02-25 ·cited 12×
  The court held that evidence of prior crimes was admissible and the exclusion of a proffered expert witness was not an abuse of discretion. The court also found sufficient evidence to support the convictions.
• United States v. Johnson C.S. CHU
  779 F.2d 356· 7th Cir.· 1985-12-09 ·cited 12×
  The court held that the government sufficiently established the defendants' opening net worth, including cash on hand, and adequately investigated leads, thus supporting the conviction for willful tax evasion.
• Redman v. Dugger
  866 F.2d 387· 11th Cir.· 1989-02-21 ·cited 11×
  The court affirmed the denial of the habeas corpus petition, finding no constitutional violations on the merits, despite disagreeing with the procedural bar finding on one claim.
• United States v. Vernon Barrett (90-5715)
  933 F.2d 355· 6th Cir.· 1991-05-08 ·cited 10×
  The court held that the evidence was sufficient to prove conspiracy and possession with intent to distribute, and that convictions for conspiracy and attempt arising from the same transaction do not violate double jeopardy.
• United States v. Blankenship
  923 F.2d 1110· 5th Cir.· 1991-02-04 ·cited 10×
  The court held that the evidence was sufficient to convict the defendant for using a firearm during a drug trafficking crime, and that prior felony convictions, regardless of age, can serve as a predicate for sentence enhancement under 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(1).
• Arlester E. Scott v. Jones
  915 F.2d 1188· 8th Cir.· 1990-10-03 ·cited 10×
  The court affirmed the district court's denial of habeas relief, finding no constitutional error in the state court proceedings or convictions.
• United States v. James B. Frost (89-5144/5145) & Charles L. Griffin (89-5146/5147)
  914 F.2d 756· 6th Cir.· 1990-09-13 ·cited 10×
  The court held that the evidence was sufficient to support the defendants' convictions for conspiracy, bribery, and misapplication of bank funds, and that the district court did not abuse its discretion in its rulings.
• United States v. Cambara
  902 F.2d 144· 1st Cir.· 1990-05-02 ·cited 10×
  The court held that the evidence was sufficient to convict José Cambara of conspiracy to defraud the United States and that the district court's denial of a for-cause juror challenge, even if erroneous, was not reversible error for Joaquín Cambara as he had additional peremptory
• United States v. Pennyman
  889 F.2d 104· 6th Cir.· 1989-11-13 ·cited 10×
  The court held that the evidence was sufficient to support a conviction for attempted possession of cocaine with intent to distribute, as the defendant's conduct unequivocally corroborated his intent to purchase and resell cocaine.
• United States v. Blair
  886 F.2d 477· 1st Cir.· 1989-09-29 ·cited 10×
  The court held that the evidence was sufficient to sustain the conviction and that there was no Brady violation.
• Selvage v. Lynaugh
  823 F.2d 845· 5th Cir.· 1987-07-23 ·cited 10×
  The court held that there was sufficient evidence to support the state court's conviction for capital murder and the resulting death sentence.
• United States v. Garth
  773 F.2d 1469· 5th Cir.· 1985-10-08 ·cited 10×
  The court held that the defendant's conviction for converting mortgaged property to his own use was supported by sufficient evidence and that his various legal arguments, including claims of constitutional violations, statutory vagueness, government estoppel, and evidentiary erro
• Healy v. Maggio
  706 F.2d 698· 5th Cir.· 1983-06-09 ·cited 10×
  The court held that the jury instruction regarding intent was harmless error because the evidence of guilt was overwhelming, and insufficient evidence does not warrant habeas relief.
• United States v. Arias
  678 F.2d 1202· 4th Cir.· 1982-05-27 ·cited 10×
• Goldman v. Anderson
  625 F.2d 135· 6th Cir.· 1980-07-25 ·cited 10×
  The court held that the petitioner's claims were procedurally barred or lacked merit, affirming the dismissal of his habeas corpus petition.
• Krasnow v. Navarro
  909 F.2d 451· 11th Cir.· 1990-08-17 ·cited 9×
  The court held that the attorney's intentional failure to notify the court of his inability to appear, despite having ample time to do so, constituted criminal contempt under Florida law, and federal habeas corpus relief was unwarranted.
• United States v. Rodolitz
  786 F.2d 77· 2d Cir.· 1986-03-17 ·cited 9×
  The court held that the government presented sufficient evidence to convict the defendant of mail fraud and witness tampering, and that the defendant's actions constituted 'misleading conduct' under the witness tampering statute.
• United States v. Golden
  671 F.2d 369· 10th Cir.· 1982-02-08 ·cited 9×
  The court held that there was sufficient evidence to support the conviction and that the trial court did not err in admitting hearsay or physical evidence, nor in failing to admonish the jury.
• United States v. Pless
  982 F.2d 1118· 7th Cir.· 1992-12-18 ·cited 8×
  The court affirmed convictions for conspiracy and firearms offenses, but remanded for completion of the written sentencing record.
• United States v. Garza
  980 F.2d 546· 9th Cir.· 1992-06-29 ·cited 8×
  The court affirmed the convictions, holding that the arrest was supported by probable cause, the search warrant was valid, the evidence was sufficient, and jury instructions were adequate or any errors were harmless.
• United States v. Chorman
  910 F.2d 102· 4th Cir.· 1990-07-31 ·cited 8×
  The court affirmed convictions for conspiracy and substantive offenses, but vacated the imposition of fines and remanded for the district court to make requisite factual findings.
• United States v. Steven L. Kaplan, M.D.
  895 F.2d 618· 9th Cir.· 1990-02-07 ·cited 8×
  The court held that the evidence was sufficient to support the conviction, the charges were properly joined, and the searches and jury instructions were not erroneous.
• Russell v. Jones
  886 F.2d 149· 8th Cir.· 1989-09-19 ·cited 8×
  The court affirmed the denial of the habeas corpus petition, finding no ineffective assistance of counsel, no suppression of confession, and sufficient evidence for conviction. The court also affirmed the denial of the state's request for transcript costs.
• United States v. Portac, Inc.
  869 F.2d 1288· 9th Cir.· 1989-03-09 ·cited 8×
  The court held that the evidence was sufficient to convict both defendants, the charges were properly joined, and no reversible errors occurred during the trial.
• United States v. Miller
  676 F.2d 359· 9th Cir.· 1982-05-03 ·cited 8×
  The court held that mailings incidental to a fraudulent scheme can satisfy the mail fraud statute if their use is reasonably foreseeable, and that statements suppressed under Miranda can be used for impeachment if voluntary and related to direct testimony.
• United States v. Hartmann
  958 F.2d 774· 7th Cir.· 1992-03-19 ·cited 7×
  The court affirmed the convictions and sentences, finding no merit in the defendants' challenges to the sufficiency of the evidence, evidentiary rulings, or prosecutorial misconduct.
• Edwards v. Butler
  882 F.2d 160· 5th Cir.· 1989-09-01 ·cited 7×
  The court affirmed the denial of the habeas petition, finding no constitutional violations in the state court proceedings.
• Buffo v. Graddick
  742 F.2d 592· 11th Cir.· 1984-09-20 ·cited 7×
  The court held that the evidence was sufficient to support Buffo's conviction for aiding and abetting securities fraud, and that Alabama had proper jurisdiction and venue.
• United States v. Arbo
  691 F.2d 862· 9th Cir.· 1982-09-24 ·cited 7×
  The court held that the misdemeanor conviction for interference with forest officers was not a serious offense requiring a jury trial, and that the United States had jurisdiction to regulate conduct on land adjacent to federal property.
• United States v. Badger
  983 F.2d 1443· 7th Cir.· 1993-01-21 ·cited 6×
  The court affirmed the convictions and sentences, finding sufficient evidence for conspiracy and telephone facilitation, and that prosecutorial misconduct did not deny a fair trial.
• United States v. Warren
  973 F.2d 1304· 6th Cir.· 1992-09-02 ·cited 6×
  The court held that sufficient evidence supported the convictions, the speedy trial rights were not violated, the jury substitution was proper, the obstruction of justice enhancement was moot, the prior convictions were validly counted, and the sentence was not cruel and unusual.
• United States v. Elizabeth Chalkias (91-3528)
  971 F.2d 1206· 6th Cir.· 1992-07-30 ·cited 6×
  The court affirmed the convictions and sentences, finding no plain error in the cross-examination, closing arguments, or jury instructions, and that the Speedy Trial Act was not violated.
• United States v. Gill
  909 F.2d 274· 7th Cir.· 1990-08-03 ·cited 6×
  The court held that the trial judge's questioning of witnesses and amendment of jury instructions did not prejudice the defendant, and the evidence was sufficient to support the convictions.
• United States v. Pieper
  854 F.2d 1020· 7th Cir.· 1988-08-12 ·cited 6×
  The court affirmed the defendant's convictions for violating 18 U.S.C. § 1954, RICO, and tax laws, but reversed the award of costs for daily transcripts.
• Campbell v. Fair
  838 F.2d 1· 1st Cir.· 1988-01-26 ·cited 6×
  The court held that the petitioners' constitutional rights were not violated by the prosecution's conduct regarding a key witness or by the sufficiency of the evidence against petitioner Doherty.
• United States v. Sempos
  772 F.2d 1· 1st Cir.· 1985-09-09 ·cited 6×
  There was sufficient evidence to establish that the defendant willfully failed to file income tax returns, as willfulness means a voluntary, intentional violation of a known legal duty.
• United States v. Pritchett
  699 F.2d 317· 6th Cir.· 1983-02-04 ·cited 6×
  The court held that the trial judge's interjection confirming a witness's criminal history and the limitation on cross-examination regarding other drug sources constituted reversible error.
• United States v. Weinstein
  834 F.2d 1454· 9th Cir.· 1987-12-22 ·cited 5×
  The court affirmed the convictions, holding that sufficient evidence supported the jury's findings regarding property belonging to the debtor's estate and that airline tickets constitute 'goods, wares, or merchandise' under the National Stolen Property Act.
• United States v. Crozier
  987 F.2d 893· 2d Cir.· 1993-03-01 ·cited 4×
  The court held that 18 U.S.C. § 666(c) prohibits both bribery and gratuities, and that the statute was not void for vagueness as applied. The court also affirmed the sufficiency of evidence for the false tax return conviction and rejected the government's cross-appeal for sentenc
• United States v. Larkin
  978 F.2d 964· 7th Cir.· 1992-10-13 ·cited 4×
  The court held that the defendants' convictions and sentence were valid, affirming the district court's decisions.
• United States v. McINNIS
  976 F.2d 1226· 9th Cir.· 1992-09-28 ·cited 4×
  The court affirmed the conviction for interfering with housing rights and using a firearm during a crime of violence, but remanded for resentencing on the civil rights charge due to an incorrect application of the Sentencing Guidelines.
• United States v. Ragosta
  970 F.2d 1085· 2d Cir.· 1992-07-23 ·cited 4×
  The court held that the evidence was sufficient to support a conviction for bank fraud under 18 U.S.C. § 1344(1), as the statute does not require proof of misrepresentation and the jury could reasonably infer fraudulent intent from the defendant's actions.
• United States v. Robinson Ramirez and Nicolas Farias Sanchez
  954 F.2d 1035· 5th Cir.· 1992-02-19 ·cited 4×
  The court affirmed Ramirez's conviction, reversed Sanchez's money laundering conviction, and remanded for resentencing.
• United States v. Bosch
  951 F.2d 1546· 9th Cir.· 1991-12-09 ·cited 4×
  The dissenting judge held that the trial judge's failure to recuse himself, based on his expressed close relationship with the prosecutor, constituted plain error affecting substantial rights and the integrity of the judicial process.
• United States v. Carrion-Caliz
  944 F.2d 220· 5th Cir.· 1991-09-27 ·cited 4×
• Chandler v. Richards
  935 F.2d 915· 7th Cir.· 1991-07-01 ·cited 4×
  The court held that the district court correctly applied the presumption of correctness under 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d) to state court findings of fact when reviewing a habeas petition for insufficient evidence, and that the evidence was sufficient to support the conviction.
• United States v. Brittain
  931 F.2d 1413· 10th Cir.· 1991-04-30 ·cited 4×
  The court held that a false statement is material if it has the tendency to influence or is capable of influencing a required agency determination, not solely enforcement actions.