3,388 Florida cases classified under this topic, plus 1,538 listed through its narrower topics · sorted by citation count · see the citation graph · browse and sort
-
M.D. Fla.·
2021-03-22
The court held that the town's ordinance banning portable signs is a content-neutral regulation that does not violate the First Amendment or the Equal Protection Clause, and thus denied the motion for a preliminary injunction.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2021-03-19
The court denied the plaintiff's motion for injunctive relief and dismissed the case without prejudice.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2021-03-19
The court denied the plaintiff's ex parte application for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunctive relief.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2021-03-18
The court granted the plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction, enjoining defendants from infringing on their trademarks.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2021-03-16
The court held that the plaintiff's complaint seeking injunctive relief was barred by collateral estoppel because the issues were already litigated and decided in a prior arbitration proceeding confirmed by the court.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2021-03-09
The court granted the motion for a preliminary injunction, adopting the magistrate judge's recommendation, finding the defendant breached contract and misappropriated trade secrets.
-
-
N.D. Fla.·
2021-02-15
The court held that a § 2241 habeas petition is not the proper vehicle to challenge the Bureau of Prisons' decision regarding home confinement, and the Administrative Procedure Act does not apply to such claims.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2021-02-12
The court granted Plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction, restraining Defendants from selling infringing goods and ordering the restraint of their financial accounts.
-
Del. Ch.·
2021-02-10
The Delaware Court of Chancery denied the motion to dismiss the claims arising under the LLC Agreements but granted a stay of the claims arising under the Employment Agreement, deferring to the identical litigation pending in Louisiana. The court found that the Louisiana action w
-
The court adopted the magistrate judge's report and recommendation, granting in part the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction and overruling the defendant's objections.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2021-01-28
Injunctive relief is not available against the Small Business Administration or its administrator under 15 U.S.C. § 634(b)(1).
-
The court held that the Church has established a substantial likelihood of prevailing on its RLUIPA substantial burden claim, warranting preliminary injunctive relief.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2021-01-22
The court held that the plaintiff failed to meet the burden of persuasion for injunctive relief.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2021-01-21
A motion for a traditional injunction must be predicated upon a cause of action, and the plaintiff must demonstrate a likelihood of success on the merits.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2021-01-13
The court held that a Bivens action is not appropriate for injunctive relief against federal prison officials regarding confinement decisions, and the plaintiff failed to demonstrate entitlement to such relief.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2021-01-11
The court held that a prisoner cannot seek injunctive relief for home confinement or conditions of confinement through a Bivens action against federal agencies or supervisory officials.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2021-01-07
The court granted preliminary approval of a class action settlement, certifying the settlement class for settlement purposes and directing notice to class members.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2021-01-07
The CFTC sued defendants for operating fraudulent binary options and digital assets affiliate marketing schemes that generated millions of dollars in illegal profits through false solicitations and materially misleading promotional content promising guaranteed profits. The court
-
Del. Ch.·
2021-01-07
The court granted Connection's request for a preliminary injunction, converting the existing status quo order into a preliminary injunction. This injunction will remain in effect until the earlier of the final disposition of the action or March 31, 2021, allowing Connection a rea
-
M.D. Fla.·
2021-01-05
The court denied the inmate's motion for injunctive relief because he failed to demonstrate a substantial likelihood of success on the merits, imminent harm, and compliance with procedural rules, especially since the case was dismissed.
-
All seven amendments to the master declaration were reasonable and enforceable. The amendments to sections 1.1.26 and 10.13 regarding commercial use restrictions, section 5.1 regarding general rule applicability, section 7.2 regarding assessments, section 10.6 regarding animal re
-
S.D. Fla.·
2020-12-29
The court held that the city's New Year's Eve curfew, enacted to mitigate COVID-19 spread, was a constitutional time, place, and manner restriction that did not violate First Amendment rights, and thus denied the plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order or preliminary
-
M.D. Fla.·
2020-12-22
The Court adopts the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, denying the Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2020-12-20
Michael Kors, L.L.C. and Gianni Versace S.r.l. sued individuals and entities operating online marketplaces for manufacturing, advertising, and selling counterfeit goods bearing their registered trademarks in violation of the Lanham Act. The court granted the plaintiffs' motion fo
-
The district court held it lacked subject matter jurisdiction to review the petitioner's challenge to a final order of removal, as such review is exclusively vested in the court of appeals.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2020-12-04
The court denied the motion for injunctive relief and dismissed the case without prejudice because the plaintiff failed to properly initiate a civil rights action and did not demonstrate entitlement to the requested relief.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2020-11-25
The court held that the plaintiff failed to demonstrate entitlement to injunctive relief.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2020-11-17
The court held that the plaintiffs' motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction was denied because it was unrelated to the claims in the amended complaint and the plaintiffs failed to establish the necessary requirements for such relief.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2020-11-11
The court held that the Governor's Executive Order mooted most, but not all, of the plaintiffs' claims challenging a county mask ordinance, and dismissed some claims for failure to state a claim.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2020-11-06
The court held that the plaintiffs' significant delay in seeking a preliminary injunction undermined their claim of irreparable harm, leading to the denial of their motion.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2020-11-04
The court denied the inmate's motion for a temporary restraining order or preliminary injunction and dismissed the case without prejudice because the inmate failed to meet the requirements for injunctive relief.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2020-11-03
Defendants Maheshwar Sewpersaud and Usine Rotec, Inc. are held in civil contempt for violating the court's prior orders, and the preliminary injunction is modified to enjoin Sewpersaud globally from working for Rotec.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2020-10-23
The court recommended granting the Receiver's fifth application for payment of fees for services rendered.
-
A condominium association is entitled to a mandatory injunction to access a unit owner's balcony for restoration work, but the circuit court erred in failing to require a bond under Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.610(b) as a condition of the injunction.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2020-10-15
The court denied the plaintiff's motion for an injunction and struck her complaint.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2020-10-13
The court granted the plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction, enjoining defendants from manufacturing, selling, or distributing infringing products and from concealing assets.
-
N.D. Fla.·
2020-10-09
The court found that the Secretary of State's failure to maintain a functional voter registration website and her subsequent limited deadline extension, with insufficient notice, likely violated constitutional rights. The court also determined that the organizational plaintiffs h
-
S.D. Fla.·
2020-10-02
The court granted plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction, finding they met the requirements for such relief.
-
The court held that the plaintiff failed to state a plausible claim for relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and that his motion for preliminary injunction was also deficient.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2020-09-25
The court granted plaintiffs' ex parte application for a temporary restraining order due to their strong likelihood of success on the merits and the irreparable harm they would suffer from defendants' alleged trademark infringement.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2020-09-22
The court held that the plaintiffs failed to establish irreparable harm, both due to their significant delay in seeking injunctive relief and their lack of corroborating evidence for claimed injuries.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2020-09-14
The court held that the plaintiff failed to meet the burden of proving by clear and convincing evidence that the defendant had the ability to comply with the preliminary injunction, and therefore, the defendant should not be held in contempt.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2020-09-11
The court held that the plaintiff failed to demonstrate entitlement to injunctive relief.
-
Veterinary Orthopedic Implants, Inc. sued its former employee Matthew Haas for breaching a non-compete agreement after he accepted employment with direct competitor Arthrex, Inc., shortly following his termination from VOI. The court granted a preliminary injunction, finding VOI
-
M.D. Fla.·
2020-09-03
The court held that the plaintiff failed to establish the necessary prerequisites for a preliminary injunction.
-
This case concerns an appeal by state officials regarding a lower court's decision to vacate an automatic stay on an emergency order related to school reopening during the COVID-19 pandemic. The appellate court found the lower court abused its discretion by vacating the stay, rei
-
This case concerns an appeal by Florida state officials regarding a lower court's decision to vacate an automatic stay on an emergency order related to school reopening during the COVID-19 pandemic. The appellate court reinstated the stay, finding the lower court abused its discr
-
S.D. Fla.·
2020-08-25
The court denied the plaintiffs' motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction because they failed to demonstrate a substantial likelihood of success on the merits, irreparable injury, or adequate notice to the defendant.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2020-08-21
The court held that plaintiffs failed to demonstrate irreparable injury, as an adequate remedy for compensation exists, thus denying their motion for a temporary restraining order.