3,388 Florida cases classified under this topic, plus 1,538 listed through its narrower topics · sorted by citation count · see the citation graph · browse and sort
-
M.D. Fla.·
2021-09-15
The court held that the inmate's motion for injunctive relief was denied because he failed to demonstrate a substantial likelihood of success on the merits or actual and imminent irreparable harm, and the court generally defers to prison administration.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2021-09-05
The court held that it had authority under Section 19 of the FTC Act to issue a preliminary injunction and asset freeze, even after the Supreme Court limited Section 13(b)'s authority for monetary relief, because the case involved violations of a rule (the TSR).
-
The court denied the plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order or preliminary injunction because it failed to comply with procedural rules and substantive requirements for injunctive relief.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2021-08-26
Highland Consulting Group sued a former employee, Jesus Minjares Soule, claiming he violated the Defend Trade Secrets Act and breached a restrictive covenant agreement by using confidential information and soliciting clients after his September 2019 resignation, while Soule count
-
S.D. Fla.·
2021-08-16
The court recommended extending the TRO as limited, dissolving it regarding the BB&T Trust Account, and setting an evidentiary hearing.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2021-08-13
The court denied the plaintiffs' ex parte motion for a temporary restraining order because they failed to meet the strict requirements for proceeding without notice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(b)(1).
-
S.D. Fla.·
2021-08-13
The court held that Levison and Rothman had actual notice of the Acquinity settlement and likely violated it, while Zangrillo did not have sufficient notice for contempt. The court also found the FTC's request for a preliminary injunction was not an impermissible end-run around t
-
S.D. Fla.·
2021-08-03
The court held that a party cannot obtain a traditional injunction without asserting an independent cause of action, and that the petitioner failed to meet the requirements for an ex parte temporary restraining order.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2021-07-28
The court held that Castellano failed to demonstrate a substantial likelihood of success on the merits or irreparable harm, thus denying the motion for a preliminary injunction.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2021-07-27
The court denied the defendant's motion for injunctive relief and sanctions, finding it lacked merit and failed to comply with procedural rules.
-
Del. Ch.·
2021-07-21
The Court of Chancery held that the parties' Employment Agreement clearly and unmistakably delegated the issue of substantive arbitrability to an arbitrator. The court found that the incorporation of the American Arbitration Association (AAA) rules, which empower arbitrators to d
-
S.D. Fla.·
2021-07-20
The court denied the motion for a preliminary injunction and temporary restraining order because the relief sought was outside the scope of the underlying action and sought against non-parties.
-
N.D. Fla.·
2021-07-11
Florida's ban on written or electronic advertisements encouraging consumers to contact contractors or public adjusters regarding insurance claims for roof damage violates the First Amendment as an impermissible restriction on commercial speech that fails intermediate scrutiny. Th
-
M.D. Fla.·
2021-07-01
The court granted partial summary judgment, establishing the plaintiff's right to condemn easements, and granted a preliminary injunction for immediate possession, finding the project served the public interest and that irreparable harm would result from delays.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2021-07-01
The court granted partial summary judgment and a preliminary injunction, establishing the plaintiff's right to condemn easements for an interstate natural gas pipeline and granting immediate possession.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2021-07-01
The court held that Florida Gas Transmission Company, LLC (FGT) has the right to condemn necessary easements for its natural gas pipeline project under the Natural Gas Act and is entitled to immediate possession via preliminary injunction.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2021-07-01
The court held that Florida Gas Transmission Company, LLC (FGT) has the right to condemn necessary easements for its natural gas pipeline project and granted a preliminary injunction for immediate possession.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2021-07-01
The court held that Florida Gas Transmission Company, LLC (FGT) has the right to condemn necessary easements for its natural gas pipeline project and is entitled to immediate possession via preliminary injunction.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2021-07-01
The court held that Florida Gas Transmission Company, LLC (FGT) has the right to condemn necessary easements for its pipeline project under the Natural Gas Act and is entitled to immediate possession via preliminary injunction.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2021-07-01
The court granted summary judgment, establishing FGT's right to condemn easements, and granted a preliminary injunction for immediate possession, finding that FGT met the statutory requirements and the standard for injunctive relief.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2021-07-01
The court granted partial summary judgment, establishing the plaintiff's right to condemn easements, and granted a preliminary injunction for immediate possession to allow construction of a natural gas pipeline.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2021-07-01
The court granted the plaintiff's motions for partial summary judgment and a preliminary injunction, establishing the plaintiff's right to condemn easements and granting immediate possession for pipeline construction.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2021-07-01
The court held that Florida Gas Transmission Company, LLC (FGT) has the right to condemn the necessary easements for its pipeline project and granted a preliminary injunction for immediate possession.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2021-07-01
The court held that Florida Gas Transmission Company, LLC (FGT) has the right to condemn necessary easements for its natural gas pipeline project and is entitled to immediate possession through a preliminary injunction.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2021-07-01
The court held that Florida Gas Transmission Company, LLC (FGT) has the right to condemn necessary easements for its pipeline project and granted a preliminary injunction for immediate possession upon FGT's deposit of security.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2021-07-01
The court held that the plaintiff, Florida Gas Transmission Company, LLC, has the right to condemn necessary easements for its natural gas pipeline project under the Natural Gas Act and is entitled to a preliminary injunction granting immediate possession.
-
The court held that certain provisions of Florida's social media law are likely preempted by federal law (47 U.S.C. § 230) or violate the First Amendment, warranting a preliminary injunction against their enforcement.
-
A white Florida farmer challenged Section 1005 of the American Rescue Plan Act, which provides debt relief to socially disadvantaged farmers and ranchers (SDFRs) defined by race, claiming the race-based relief violates his equal protection rights under the Fifth Amendment. The di
-
The Florida Supreme Court adopted amendments to six family law forms governing petitions and injunctions for protection against domestic violence to align with 2020 legislative changes to Chapter 741, Florida Statutes, and clarified one form regarding denial of petitions. The ame
-
M.D. Fla.·
2021-06-17
The court granted plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction, enjoining defendants from using the plaintiff's trademarks on counterfeit goods and restraining their assets.
-
This appellate court dismissed an appeal concerning a temporary injunction as moot because a subsequent judgment rendered the injunction unnecessary. The court also dismissed a challenge to proceedings supplementary for lack of jurisdiction.
-
The trial court erred in concluding that physicians did not violate a nonsolicitation provision prohibiting treatment of former patients of Tampa Pain Relief Center during a twenty-four-month restricted period without written consent, where evidence showed the doctors treated 644
-
The Florida Supreme Court reversed a lower court decision that had issued a temporary injunction prohibiting enforcement of statutory regulations governing medical marijuana treatment centers, finding that the company Florigrown failed to demonstrate a substantial likelihood of s
-
The court held that a motion to dismiss Count Four for failure to state a claim for preliminary injunction was improper, as Count Four stated a claim for declaratory judgment.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2021-05-20
The court granted Plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction, enjoining Defendants from using Plaintiff's trademarks and copyrighted works and restraining their financial accounts.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2021-05-18
The court held that Florida failed to establish standing to seek a preliminary injunction against federal immigration enforcement policies, as its claimed injuries were speculative and not concrete.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2021-05-14
The court recommended granting the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction, finding that the plaintiff is likely to succeed on the merits of their trademark infringement claim and will suffer irreparable harm if the injunction is not granted.
-
The court held that the BOP correctly calculated the petitioner's sentences to run consecutively and that challenges to the validity of the sentence revocation must be brought under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, not § 2241.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2021-04-27
The court held that the petitioner's claims of ineffective assistance of counsel and request for a preliminary injunction were without merit.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2021-04-23
The court denied Plaintiff's emergency motion for a preliminary injunction because it failed to comply with local rules for emergency filings and was premature due to lack of service on the defendant.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2021-04-23
The court denied the application for a preliminary injunction because the plaintiff failed to demonstrate a substantial threat of irreparable injury due to an unexplained, significant delay in seeking enforcement of its trademark rights.
-
Appellants challenged a trial court's nonfinal order granting a temporary injunction requiring them to remove their boat from a boat lift. The appellate court reversed, finding that appellees failed to present competent, substantial evidence supporting the required elements for i
-
The appellate court reversed a temporary injunction that ordered the removal of a boat, finding that the party seeking the injunction failed to present sufficient evidence to support the required legal elements. The case was remanded for an evidentiary hearing.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2021-04-19
The court granted the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction, restraining defendants from selling infringing products and ordering financial institutions to freeze assets associated with the infringement.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2021-04-15
The court held that the plaintiff inmate failed to meet the requirements for a temporary restraining order or preliminary injunction and dismissed the case.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2021-04-14
A temporary restraining order is appropriate under the Lanham Act when a trademark owner demonstrates a substantial likelihood of success on the merits of its infringement claim, irreparable injury absent immediate relief, that the threatened injury outweighs harm to the defendan
-
M.D. Fla.·
2021-04-01
The court held that a non-party cannot join an existing action for permissive joinder or benefit from a preliminary injunction granted to an individual plaintiff who did not represent a class.
-
The appellate court reversed a lower court's denial of a preliminary injunction, finding that a neighbor's use of a high-powered security camera to surveil a backyard enclosed by a privacy fence could constitute invasion of privacy. The court certified a question of great public
-
A temporary injunction against former employees and their new employer was properly issued where the former employees violated enforceable restrictive covenants and confidentiality clauses in their employment agreements by soliciting the former employer's agents and policyholders
-
Del. Ch.·
2021-03-23
The Court granted SPay's motion for a preliminary anti-suit injunction, finding that the forum selection clause in the asset purchase agreement (APA) was enforceable and required both the fraudulent inducement claim and the declaratory judgment claim regarding the Restrictive Cov