3,388 Florida cases classified under this topic, plus 1,538 listed through its narrower topics · sorted by citation count · see the citation graph · browse and sort
-
M.D. Fla.·
2022-11-10
The court denied the plaintiffs' motion for a temporary restraining order because it was procedurally deficient and lacked sufficient urgency, but reserved ruling on the preliminary injunction.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2022-11-08
The court denied the plaintiffs' request for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction because they failed to meet the procedural requirements for such relief.
-
The Eleventh Circuit held that the case is moot because the underlying state proceedings have concluded, and the appellant prevailed at each stage, rendering the requested federal relief meaningless.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2022-11-01
The court held that the inmate's filing was insufficient for injunctive relief and did not properly initiate a civil rights action.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2022-11-01
The court denied the defendants' motion for a stay pending appeal because they failed to demonstrate a likelihood of success on the merits or irreparable harm, and the balance of equities weighed against a stay.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2022-10-28
The court denied the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction and temporary restraining order because he failed to meet the required legal standards and procedural requirements.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2022-10-25
The Federal Trade Commission sued American Vehicle Protection Corp. for deceptively marketing and selling extended automobile warranties through telemarketers who misrepresented affiliations with car dealerships and made false promises about coverage and refund policies. The cour
-
M.D. Fla.·
2022-10-24
The court denied the plaintiff's emergency motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction because it was procedurally and substantively deficient.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2022-10-14
The court held that a motion for an emergency temporary restraining order (TRO) must be denied when it fails to meet the strict requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(b), including showing immediate and irreparable injury, providing a sworn affidavit, giving proper no
-
-
The court held that the plaintiffs failed to show that Georgia's print date for paper backup voter lists imposed a severe burden on the right to vote, and thus the State's administrative concerns justified the current policy. The court dismissed the appeal regarding scanner setti
-
The court held that plaintiffs failed to demonstrate irreparable harm, a necessary element for a preliminary injunction.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2022-09-29
The court granted the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction, finding it appropriate based on the parties' stipulation and the likelihood of success on the merits of trademark infringement claims.
-
The court granted the ex parte application for a temporary restraining order, finding the petitioner demonstrated a likelihood of success on the merits, irreparable harm, a favorable balance of hardships, and that the order would serve the public interest.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2022-09-26
The court denied the motion for an ex parte temporary restraining order because the plaintiffs failed to meet the stringent requirements for such relief. The court deferred ruling on the preliminary injunction pending the defendants' response.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2022-09-23
The court held that the complaint was a shotgun pleading warranting dismissal, and specific counts were dismissed with prejudice due to failure to state a claim, while the request for a preliminary injunction was denied.
-
The court held that it lacked subject-matter jurisdiction to review the USCIS decision denying the plaintiffs' application for adjustment of status.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2022-09-09
The court held that plaintiff is not a prevailing party for purposes of attorney's fees under 42 U.S.C. § 1988 because the relief obtained was provisional and has not resulted in an enduring change in the legal relationship between the parties, as the case has not been definitive
-
Former President Trump sought judicial oversight and the appointment of a special master to review documents and personal items seized from his residence in an FBI search on August 8, 2022, citing concerns about privilege protections and the return of personal property. The court
-
-
M.D. Fla.·
2022-08-04
The court adopted the Magistrate Judge's report and recommendation, granting the franchisor's motion for preliminary injunction.
-
Del. Ch.·
2022-08-01
The court granted the plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction, requiring the defendants to continue providing services under the Transition Services Agreement (TSA). This relief was conditioned upon the plaintiffs posting a $2.8 million monthly surety bond. The court foun
-
The court held that the plaintiff's amended complaint sufficiently alleged an Eighth Amendment deliberate indifference claim against Dr. Papillon to survive a motion to dismiss, but denied the motion for a preliminary injunction due to limitations imposed by the PLRA.
-
11th Cir.·
2022-07-29
Bradley Hester, on behalf of a class of indigent pretrial detainees, challenged Cullman County's bail system as unconstitutionally discriminating against the poor and denying due process, and the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed in part and reversed in part. The court h
-
M.D. Fla.·
2022-07-20
The court held that the plaintiff failed to allege facts sufficient to state a plausible claim for denial of access to courts or violation of privacy, and thus failed to demonstrate a likelihood of success on the merits for injunctive relief.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2022-07-15
The Court denied the Plaintiff's emergency motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction, as well as her request to amend the complaint.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2022-06-30
An inmate incarcerated in Florida sought damages against a prison physician under the Eighth Amendment for deliberate indifference to serious medical needs, claiming the physician failed to reissue specialist-prescribed medical passes following shoulder surgery, refused to pursue
-
M.D. Fla.·
2022-06-30
The court held that a preliminary injunction is unwarranted because the plaintiff failed to establish irreparable harm, as the remedies sought relate to collecting a money judgment and adequate legal remedies exist.
-
N.D. Fla.·
2022-06-27
Plaintiffs have not met their burden to establish standing to pursue preliminary injunctive relief, except potentially for one plaintiff whose motion is reserved.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2022-06-23
The court denied the plaintiff's motion for injunctive relief and ordered him to file an amended complaint because the original complaint was a "shotgun pleading" that failed to state claims with sufficient specificity.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2022-06-22
The court denied the plaintiff's motion for injunctive relief because he failed to meet the required legal standards for such relief.
-
The court held that the plaintiffs failed to establish the necessary elements for a preliminary injunction, including a substantial likelihood of success on the merits and irreparable harm.
-
Del.·
2022-06-15
The Court held that the Omnibus Agreement constituted an 'Asset Transfer' under Stream's charter, requiring a majority vote of Class B stockholders. Therefore, the Resolution Committee lacked the authority to approve the agreement without such a vote. The Court also clarified tha
-
M.D. Fla.·
2022-06-10
The court denied the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction because it failed to meet the required procedural and substantive elements.
-
Courthouse News Service challenged delays by Florida's Broward County court system in providing public access to newly filed civil complaints, arguing the delays violated the First Amendment's right to access judicial records. The court held that the First Amendment guarantees a
-
S.D. Fla.·
2022-06-09
Luxury goods manufacturers Richemont International SA and related companies sued multiple individuals and entities operating online e-commerce stores on Amazon, DHgate, eBay, and Wish for selling counterfeit versions of their trademarked watches, jewelry, and accessories includin
-
A local government must follow its own procedural requirements for comprehensive plan amendments even though state law treats such amendments as legislative decisions subject to the fairly debatable standard of review.
-
-
The court recommended denying the motion for a preliminary injunction.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2022-06-03
The court granted in part and denied in part the petitioner's motion for a temporary restraining order, prohibiting the child's removal from the jurisdiction and scheduling an expedited hearing.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2022-06-01
The court held that the plaintiff lacked standing to seek a preliminary injunction because he failed to establish a redressable injury or a credible threat of enforcement of the UCCJEA judgment.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2022-05-24
Military servicemembers challenged a Department of Defense COVID-19 vaccine mandate on the grounds that it violated their religious freedom rights and other constitutional protections, seeking preliminary injunctive relief to prevent enforcement while the case proceeded. The cour
-
S.D. Fla.·
2022-05-09
The court held that there are genuine issues of material fact regarding the enforceability of restrictive covenants and the alleged breach, thus denying summary judgment on these claims.
-
The court granted Permobil's motion for a preliminary injunction, finding it met the four-part test for such relief.
-
Fareda Sands appealed a trial court's grant of a temporary injunction preventing her from violating a non-disclosure, non-solicitation, and non-competition agreement with her former employer. The court affirmed the issuance of the injunction but reversed and remanded regarding th
-
M.D. Fla.·
2022-05-03
The court held that the inmate's request for injunctive relief was denied due to failure to meet the prerequisites, including irreparable harm and procedural compliance.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2022-04-28
The court denied the plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order because he failed to demonstrate a likelihood of success on the merits or irreparable harm.
-
N.D. Fla.·
2022-04-11
The court held that the plaintiff's allegations of imminent danger were too vague to proceed in forma pauperis, and thus denied his motions.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2022-04-04
The court held that the plaintiff failed to meet the burden of persuasion for the four prerequisites of injunctive relief.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2022-03-24
The court granted defendants' motion to hold plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction in abeyance pending resolution of a motion to stay and a parallel Texas proceeding.