3,388 Florida cases classified under this topic, plus 1,538 listed through its narrower topics · sorted by citation count · see the citation graph · browse and sort
-
A party's motion to file documents under seal is denied when the party fails to make a particularized showing of good cause beyond generalized claims of competitive harm or reliance on a confidentiality agreement.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2023-06-12
The court granted Plaintiff's motion to extend the preliminary injunction, finding that the requirements for such an injunction were met, and stayed the case as to one defendant due to bankruptcy.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2023-06-09
The court denied the motion for preliminary injunction and granted the motion to dismiss, finding that while the plaintiff had standing and its claims were ripe regarding certain provisions, the religious exception presented a threshold issue requiring further development.
-
The court adopted the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, denying the motion to proceed in forma pauperis and dismissing the complaint for failure to state a claim.
-
This case concerns whether landscaping by a developer in a public swale area was consistent with the original plat dedication. The appellate court affirmed the lower court's denial of a temporary injunction and ejectment, finding the landscaping permissible under the dedication's
-
S.D. Fla.·
2023-05-25
The court granted Plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction against most defendants, enjoining them from using the CreeLED Marks and restraining their assets, while accepting a bond from one defendant.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2023-05-23
The Court adopts the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, granting Plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction because Plaintiffs have standing and are substantially likely to succeed on their claim that the City of Miami engaged in racial gerrymandering.
-
N.D. Fla.·
2023-05-19
The court held that the remaining plaintiffs lacked Article III standing at the time they filed suit, requiring dismissal of their claims.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2023-05-18
The court granted plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction, finding that the defendants violated restrictive covenants by soliciting employees and misappropriating confidential information.
-
A party seeking a temporary injunction must establish all five elements—substantial likelihood of success on the merits, likelihood of irreparable harm, unavailability of an adequate remedy at law, that the threatened injury outweighs possible harm, and that issuance will not dis
-
-
M.D. Fla.·
2023-05-17
The court held that the complaint was a shotgun pleading and therefore stricken, and the motion for a preliminary injunction was denied without prejudice for failure to provide notice.
-
The Court adopts the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, denying the Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2023-05-15
The court denied the defendants' motion for a stay of the preliminary injunction pending appeal, finding they were unlikely to succeed on the merits.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2023-05-12
The court denied the inmate's motion for a temporary restraining order because he failed to demonstrate a likelihood of success on the merits or that the requested relief was related to the claims in his operative complaint.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2023-05-10
The court granted a preliminary injunction against defendants who were properly served, finding a likelihood of success on the merits and irreparable harm from trademark infringement and counterfeiting.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2023-05-05
The court accepted and adopted the Magistrate Judge's report and recommendation, denying the plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2023-04-27
The court held that the service-of-suit amendments did not repeal the arbitration clause, and therefore, the dispute must be arbitrated. The court also found no delegation provision in the arbitration clause.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2023-04-27
The court granted in part and denied in part Plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order, finding a likelihood of success on the breach of contract claim regarding the Denton Franchise Agreement but not on trademark or FDUTPA claims.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2023-04-27
The Court grants in part and defers in part Argonaut Insurance Company's motion for civil contempt and sanctions, ordering defendants to show cause why they should not be held in contempt.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2023-04-26
The court granted the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction, enjoining certain defendants from manufacturing, selling, or transferring infringing products and restraining their assets.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2023-04-14
The court denied the plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction because they failed to demonstrate irreparable injury due to significant delay in seeking the injunction.
-
The court granted the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction, restraining defendants from selling infringing goods and requiring third parties to freeze associated funds.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2023-03-31
The court held that the plaintiffs failed to establish Article III standing because they did not allege facts demonstrating an injury-in-fact, specifically that they were able to bid on specific contracts and would face unequal treatment.
-
-
M.D. Fla.·
2023-03-28
The court held that the petitioner failed to meet the heightened burden for a mandatory injunction and did not comply with procedural rules.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2023-03-23
The court adopted the Magistrate Judge's recommendation to grant a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) against the defendant for copyright infringement, but denied the request for a preliminary injunction due to improper service.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2023-03-21
The court held that Plaintiff demonstrated a substantial likelihood of success on the merits of its trademark infringement claim, justifying a preliminary injunction.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2023-03-17
The court granted MCINC's application for a preliminary injunction, finding that MCINC is likely to succeed on the merits of its claims for trademark, copyright, and patent infringement and that immediate and irreparable harm would occur if the injunction were not granted.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2023-03-10
The court held that the plaintiff failed to carry his burden to demonstrate entitlement to injunctive relief, and therefore his motions are denied.
-
The court held that Oppenheimer failed to establish a likelihood of success on the merits or irreparable injury, and the balance of harms weighed against granting the injunction.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2023-03-06
The court adopted the Magistrate Judge's report and recommendation, granting in part the plaintiffs' motion and entering a preliminary injunction against certain defendants.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2023-03-01
The court granted in part plaintiffs' motion for a temporary restraining order, finding a likelihood of success on the merits for breach of contract and trademark infringement claims.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2023-02-28
The court held that plaintiffs René Garcia and Javier Fernández have standing to challenge the in-office lobbying restrictions, but no plaintiff has standing to challenge the post-office restrictions.
-
The court affirmed the injunction prohibiting appellants from using Heath Ritenour's 23-year-old mugshot without permission for commercial purposes and from making false statements regarding IOA's insurance license, as these were narrowly tailored and did not violate the First Am
-
An injunction prohibiting tortious interference with business relationships through use of an irrelevant mugshot and false statements about regulatory license suspension is proper, as these conduct exceed First Amendment protections. However, injunctions broadly restricting the r
-
M.D. Fla.·
2023-02-17
The court held that plaintiffs have established a substantial likelihood of success on their Title IX claim and will suffer irreparable harm, warranting a preliminary injunction.
-
The court granted Plaintiff's ex parte motion for a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO), finding a likelihood of patent infringement and irreparable harm, and ordered an injunction, asset restraint, and expedited discovery.
-
This case involved a dispute over a restrictive covenant and trade secrets. The appellate court affirmed most of the lower court's decision but reversed and remanded for a recalculation of damages due to a factual error regarding the timing of an injunction.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2023-02-08
The court granted the plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction to restrain the defendants' assets, preventing them from dissipating or moving assets outside of the United States.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2023-01-31
The court adopted the magistrate judge's report and recommendation, granting the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2023-01-18
The court granted plaintiffs' motion for a temporary restraining order, finding that they demonstrated a substantial likelihood of success on the merits of their copyright infringement claim and that irreparable harm would occur without immediate relief.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2023-01-18
The court denied the plaintiff's motions for emergency protection and a temporary restraining order/injunction.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2023-01-18
The court denied the motion for a restraining order and preliminary injunction because the movant failed to comply with local rules and substantive requirements for such relief.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2023-01-15
The Court adopts the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation in part, finding that the Interested Parties lacked the requisite notice to contest the allegations against them and therefore lacked the likelihood of success on the merits for injunctive relief.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2023-01-10
The court held that a temporary restraining order should issue, but required the plaintiff to post a bond to protect the defendant from potential damages.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2023-01-10
The court denied the petitioner's motion for an arrest warrant and directed him to file an amended petition clarifying jurisdiction and causes of action.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2023-01-09
The court held that sanctions were not warranted against the plaintiff for filing an amended complaint or an emergency motion, as these actions were not objectively frivolous or presented for an improper purpose at this stage.
-
The Eleventh Circuit held that the students' claim was not moot and that the district court erred by misconstruing the scope of the program at issue and failing to consider the students' unjustified isolation theory.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2022-11-21
The court granted an ex parte temporary restraining order because the petitioner demonstrated a likelihood of success on his Hague Convention claim, irreparable injury, a favorable balance of harms, and that the relief sought would not be adverse to the public interest.