-
68 So. 2d 406·
Fla.·
1953-11-17
·cited 107×
Florida Power & Light Company appealed a jury verdict of $225,360 in favor of Calvin Robinson, an employee of an independent contractor hired to remove and replace power poles, who was injured when a deteriorated pole snapped while he was working on it. The Supreme Court held tha
-
84 So. 2d 560·
Fla.·
1956-01-13
·cited 67×
The Florida Supreme Court affirmed a probate court's denial of a testator's will and codicil on grounds of lack of testamentary capacity. The court applied the standard that findings of fact by a probate judge will not be disturbed on appeal absent clear error or substantial lack
-
115 Fla. 692·
Fla.·
1934-07-05
·cited 27×
In this probate dispute, the Florida Supreme Court affirmed the circuit court's reversal of the probate court's order denying revocation of Mrs. Kuehmsted's will. The court held that because a prior decree had established Mrs. Kuehmsted lacked mental capacity to marry, and her wi
-
109 So. 2d 375·
Fla. 2d DCA·
1959-01-09
·cited 23×
The Florida District Court of Appeal affirmed a county judge's order invalidating the Last Will of Laura M. Brackett for lack of testamentary capacity. A. G. Wakefield, named executor in the disputed will that left the estate to Jehovah's Witnesses, appealed the invalidation, but
-
495 So. 2d 1195·
Fla. 3d DCA·
1986-09-23
·cited 18×
Mohumman Zabrani sought insurance proceeds from his wife's death, but her parents (the Riverons) challenged his entitlement, alleging he murdered her with his girlfriend Iris Monroy. The trial court granted summary judgment for the Riverons based on Monroy's sworn confession impl
-
158 Fla. 51·
Fla.·
1946-10-22
·cited 18×
This Florida Supreme Court case concerns a will challenge by four nephews and nieces of a 90-year-old testatrix (Mary F. Cagney). The court upheld the will against claims that the testatrix lacked testamentary capacity and that a charitable trust established in the will was inval
-
74 So. 2d 647·
Fla.·
1954-09-14
·cited 16×
M. J. Murrey challenged a trust agreement executed by his elderly mother, Margaret E. Blum, arguing she lacked testamentary capacity and that the trust should be set aside. The Florida Supreme Court affirmed the lower court's rejection of his claims, holding that the evidence sup
-
275 So. 2d 244·
Fla.·
1973-03-21
·cited 14×
This case addresses whether a probate judge's finding that the testator lacked testamentary capacity when executing his 1965 will should be upheld despite conflicting evidence. The Florida Supreme Court held that where evidence is conflicting but sufficiently substantial and comp
-
247 So. 2d 488·
Fla. 2d DCA·
1971-05-05
·cited 13×
Dorothy Boyd sought to revoke probate of her deceased stepmother's 1965 will, arguing the testator lacked capacity due to an insane delusion. The trial court found the testator executed the will during a lucid interval despite prior incompetency adjudication, and the appellate co
-
143 Fla. 404·
Fla.·
1940-06-18
·cited 13×
The Florida Supreme Court affirmed a lower court decree that voided transfers of property from an elderly man with diminished mental capacity to the defendants who had confined him and systematically obtained his assets through a fraudulent scheme. The court reduced the attorney'
-
139 So. 2d 440·
Fla. 1st DCA·
1962-03-27
·cited 12×
In this probate appeal, the Florida District Court of Appeal reversed a trial court's validation of three joint bank account transfers made by an 81-year-old decedent in his final days while hospitalized and heavily medicated. The court held that the transfers lacked donative int
-
119 So. 2d 61·
Fla. 2d DCA·
1960-03-25
·cited 12×
In a probate will contest, the Florida District Court of Appeal affirmed the trial court's admission of a 1957 will to probate, holding that even though the testator had been adjudicated incompetent in 1951, evidence showed the will was executed during a lucid interval, and the b
-
268 So. 2d 446·
Fla. 4th DCA·
1972-11-02
·cited 10×
The Fourth District Court of Appeal reversed a probate court's decision revoking John F. Weihe's will based on lack of testamentary capacity. The court held that the probate judge misapprehended the legal effect of evidence as a whole, and that the preponderance of evidence—parti
-
612 F.2d 539·
Ct. Cl.·
1979-12-12
·cited 9×
The court held that the plaintiff was not under a legal disability during the relevant period, and therefore his claim was barred by the statute of limitations.
-
963 So. 2d 731·
Fla. 3d DCA·
2007-05-23
·cited 7×
In this will contest appeal, the Florida Third District Court of Appeal affirmed the trial court's dismissal of Francisco Diaz's challenge to Jorge Mesa's will naming Frank Ashworth as sole beneficiary. The court held that Mesa had testamentary capacity at the time of execution a
-
499 F.2d 44·
9th Cir.·
1974-06-20
·cited 6×
The court held that the Secretary's determination that the husband's will was valid and that the wife had no dower interest in the restricted Indian allotment land was supported by substantial evidence and within the Secretary's limited discretion.
-
447 F.2d 1029·
7th Cir.·
1971-08-25
·cited 6×
The court held that the trial court committed reversible error by improperly denying the plaintiff's motion to call a hospital supervisor as an adverse witness, excluding the testimony of a prior treating physician, and allowing defense counsel to misstate the law regarding volun
-
407 So. 2d 358·
Fla. 5th DCA·
1981-12-16
·cited 5×
In this will contest, the trial court revoked probate of a January 1980 will naming Mary Schwartz as beneficiary, finding the 89-year-old testator lacked testamentary capacity and that Schwartz exercised undue influence. On appeal, the beneficiary challenges both findings, but th
-
708 So. 2d 602·
Fla. 3d DCA·
1998-02-18
·cited 3×
The Florida Third District Court of Appeal reversed the probate court's admission of a will executed by a testator who had been adjudicated incompetent months earlier, holding that the proponent failed to meet the burden of proving the testator had a lucid interval with actual te
-
363 So. 2d 630·
Fla. 3d DCA·
1978-10-31
·cited 2×
Virginia Hodges, a niece excluded from Elizabeth Blakey's 1972 will, appealed the probate court's admission of the will and denial of her petition for revocation based on alleged lack of testamentary capacity. The appellate court affirmed the probate order, finding competent subs
-
Del. Ch.·
2006-10-06
The court held that Mrs. Peterman was incompetent to transfer her property by deed to Donald on July 6, 2005, due to her advanced Alzheimer's dementia. Consequently, the deed creating a joint tenancy with right of survivorship in the home place was void. The court also found that
-
132 So. 2d 42·
Fla. 3d DCA·
1961-07-20
The appellant sought to revoke a will executed by the testatrix on December 12, 1958, on grounds of lack of mental capacity, but the trial court found insufficient evidence to overcome the presumption of sanity and denied the petition. The appellate court affirmed, holding that a