Irreparable Injury

1,544 Florida cases classified under this topic, plus 167 listed through its narrower topics · sorted by citation count · see the citation graph · browse and sort

• Aspire Health P'rs, Inc. v. Aspire MGT LLC
  M.D. Fla.· 2025-02-12
  The court denied the defendant's motion to stay a preliminary injunction pending appeal, finding the defendant failed to establish any of the four required elements.
• Alexander v. Fla. State Univ.
  N.D. Fla.· 2025-02-11
  The court recommended denying the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction because the plaintiff failed to establish a substantial likelihood of success on the merits.
• Wright v. 15th Dist. Palm Beach Cnty. State Attorney's Off.
  S.D. Fla.· 2025-02-07
  The court accepted the magistrate judge's report and recommendation, denying the plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order.
• Hickman v. Jordan
  M.D. Fla.· 2025-02-07 ·via Immediate And Irreparable Injury
  The court held that the plaintiffs' motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction was denied without prejudice due to failure to comply with procedural requirements.
• Soka Gakkai International-USA v. United States Army Corps of Eng'rs
  S.D. Fla.· 2025-01-31 ·via Substantial Threat Of Irreparable Injury
  The court recommended denying the plaintiffs' emergency motion for a preliminary injunction because they failed to demonstrate a substantial likelihood of success on the merits or a substantial threat of actual and imminent irreparable injury.
• Carter v. DRJ Venice LLC
  M.D. Fla.· 2025-01-30
  The court denied the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction because the requested relief was against a non-party and the plaintiff failed to meet the necessary legal standards.
• Rouzard v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.
  M.D. Fla.· 2025-01-28
  The court held that the plaintiff failed to exhaust administrative remedies and did not demonstrate a valid basis to waive the exhaustion requirement.
• Mohamad v. Lawgical Insight
  M.D. Fla.· 2025-01-17
  The court denied the plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction because the plaintiff failed to demonstrate a substantial likelihood of success on the merits.
• EB-5 Inc. Reg'l Ctr., LLC v. Dir. of U.S. Citizenship & Immigr. Servs.
  S.D. Fla.· 2025-01-08
  The court recommended denying the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction because the defendant agreed not to terminate the plaintiff's designation and the plaintiff is now compliant with fee obligations, rendering the request moot.
• Mohamad v. Lawgical Insight
  M.D. Fla.· 2025-01-06
  The court denied the plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction because the plaintiff failed to carry his burden of persuasion regarding the balance of hardships.
• Peyton v. Grant
  S.D. Fla.· 2024-12-31
  The court granted the motion to appoint a receiver, finding that the parties' inability to agree on company operations created imminent danger of harm to the business and their interests within it.
• Garrett Elecs., Inc. v. The Individuals
  S.D. Fla.· 2024-12-31
  The court recommended granting the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction against defendants for trademark and patent infringement and counterfeiting.
• Thompson v. U.S. Dep't of Homeland Sec.
  M.D. Fla.· 2024-12-30
  The court held that the plaintiff failed to demonstrate a substantial likelihood of success on the merits of her Administrative Procedure Act claim, thus denying her motion for a preliminary injunction.
• Kitchi Ditlhi Tr. v. Alvaro
  M.D. Fla.· 2024-12-27
  The court denied the plaintiff's motions for a preliminary injunction because they failed to meet the required legal standard and procedural rules.
• Goorin Bros., Inc. v. The Individuals
  S.D. Fla.· 2024-12-23
  The court recommended granting in part and denying in part Plaintiff's motion for default final judgment, finding sufficient allegations for copyright and trademark infringement, and entitlement to injunctive relief and statutory damages.
• Somerville v. Dep't of Health & Human Servs.
  M.D. Fla.· 2024-12-20
  The court held that the plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order was denied because it failed to meet the required legal and procedural standards.
• Aspire Health P'rs, Inc. v. Aspire MGT LLC
  M.D. Fla.· 2024-12-19
  Aspire Health Partners, a nonprofit healthcare provider holding trademark registrations for "ASPIRE HEALTH PARTNERS," "ASPIRE HEALTH," and "ASPIRE," sought a preliminary injunction against Aspire MGT LLC, a nursing home operator using the similar mark "ASPIRE HEALTH GROUP" on its
• Chanel, Inc. v. The Individuals
  S.D. Fla.· 2024-12-16
  The court recommended granting the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction, finding a substantial likelihood of success on the merits, irreparable injury, a favorable balance of harms, and that the injunction serves the public interest.
• The Kyjen Co., LLC v. The Individuals
  S.D. Fla.· 2024-12-06
  The court granted the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction, restraining defendants from infringing on the plaintiff's design patent and ordering various third parties to assist in enforcing the injunction.
• Tiffany (NJ) LLC v. The Individuals
  S.D. Fla.· 2024-12-04
  The court recommended granting Plaintiff's motion for default final judgment, finding that Plaintiff sufficiently pleaded its claims and is entitled to injunctive relief and statutory damages.
• We The People Health & Wellness Ctr. LLC v. Parus
  M.D. Fla.· 2024-12-02
  The court denied the ex parte motion for a temporary restraining order because the plaintiff failed to provide sufficient justification for proceeding without notice to the defendant.
• Purple Innovation, LLC v. The Individuals
  S.D. Fla.· 2024-11-27
  The court recommended granting the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction, finding a strong likelihood of success on the merits of trademark and patent infringement claims.
• SheFit Operating Co., LLC v. The Individuals
  S.D. Fla.· 2024-11-25
  The court granted the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction, restraining defendants from infringing on the plaintiff's patent and ordering various third parties to disable infringing operations and provide discovery.
• Chanel, Inc. v. The Individuals
  S.D. Fla.· 2024-11-21
  The court recommended granting the plaintiff's application for a preliminary injunction, finding a substantial likelihood of success on the merits and irreparable harm.
• GoPro, Inc. v. The Individuals
  S.D. Fla.· 2024-11-19
  The court recommended granting Plaintiff's motion for entry of final default judgment against defendants for copyright infringement, trademark counterfeiting, false designation of origin, and unfair competition.
• DiFOLD Inc. v. The Individuals
  S.D. Fla.· 2024-11-19
  The court granted Plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction, restraining Defendants from infringing on Plaintiff's design patents and ordering the preservation and restraint of assets.
• Garcia v. Consumer Credit Union
  S.D. Fla.· 2024-11-18
  The court recommended granting the motion to quash service because service was improper under federal and state rules, and denying the motion for a cease-and-desist order because the plaintiff failed to establish the elements for injunctive relief.
• XYZ Corp. v. THE Individuals
  S.D. Fla.· 2024-11-15
  The court granted plaintiff's motion for default final judgment, finding that the defaulting defendants infringed plaintiff's patent and were liable for damages and injunctive relief.
• Jordan v. Jacksonville Sheriff's Off.
  M.D. Fla.· 2024-11-13
  The court held that the plaintiff failed to state a plausible claim for false arrest or denial of medical care, and also failed to meet the requirements for injunctive relief.
• Se. Dev. P'rs, LLC v. St. Johns Cnty.
  M.D. Fla.· 2024-11-13
  The court denied the motion to stay enforcement of the bill of costs because the movant failed to demonstrate a likelihood of success on appeal or irreparable injury.
• Malletier v. The Individuals
  S.D. Fla.· 2024-11-08
  The court recommended granting a preliminary injunction against defendants for trademark counterfeiting and infringement, finding a substantial likelihood of success on the merits and irreparable harm.
• Peleg Design Ltd. v. The Individuals
  S.D. Fla.· 2024-11-08
  The court granted the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction, restraining defendants from infringing on the plaintiff's patent and copyright.
• Thompson v. Centurion of Fla. LLC
  N.D. Fla.· 2024-10-23
  The court recommended denying the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction because he failed to establish a substantial likelihood of success on the merits and a substantial threat of irreparable injury.
• Floridians Protecting Freedom Inc v. Ladapo
  N.D. Fla.· 2024-10-17
  The court held that the state's actions in threatening broadcasters with prosecution for airing a political advertisement constituted unconstitutional coercion and viewpoint discrimination, violating the First Amendment.
• Univ. Of Miami v. Caneup LLC
  S.D. Fla.· 2024-10-16
  University of Miami sued CANEUP LLC for trademark infringement based on the defendant's use of the "CANEUP" mark on clothing and apparel, alleging it was confusingly similar to the university's long-established "CANES" and orange-and-green "U" design marks. The court granted defa
• Tushbaby, Inc. v. The Corps.
  S.D. Fla.· 2024-10-08
  The court granted Plaintiff's ex parte application for a temporary restraining order, finding a strong probability of success on the merits of copyright and trade dress infringement claims and the likelihood of irreparable harm.
• Abs-Cbn Corp. v. hdmvs.top
  S.D. Fla.· 2024-10-08
  The court recommended granting the plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction, finding a substantial likelihood of success on the merits and irreparable harm if relief is not granted.
• Class Act Rest. Grp. LLC v. City of Deerfield Beach
  S.D. Fla.· 2024-10-04
  The court recommended denying the motion for a temporary restraining order because the plaintiff failed to establish a substantial likelihood of success on the merits, irreparable injury, or that the threatened injury outweighed the harm to the defendant, and that the relief woul
• Socket Solutions, LLC v. Imp. Global, LLC
  S.D. Fla.· 2024-09-29 ·via Presumption Of Irreparable Injury
  The Court affirmed the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, granting Plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction and overruling Defendant's objections.
• Sumfinidade Unipessoal LDA v. Yachtlife Techs. Inc
  S.D. Fla.· 2024-09-24
  The court recommended granting in part and denying in part the plaintiff's motion for default judgment, finding sufficient basis for copyright infringement liability and injunctive relief, but requiring further inquiry into damages.
• XYZ Corp. v. The Individuals
  S.D. Fla.· 2024-09-19
  The court recommended granting the plaintiff's motion for default final judgment against defendants who counterfeited and infringed its trademark, awarding statutory damages and injunctive relief.
• Thomas v. Beadle
  M.D. Fla.· 2024-09-17
  The court held that a motion for preliminary injunction cannot be used to obtain final relief on the merits without hearing from the opposing party.
• Ladera v. The Individuals
  S.D. Fla.· 2024-09-17
  The court recommended granting the plaintiff's motion for final default judgment, permanent injunction, and statutory damages due to defendants' willful copyright infringement.
• Karsten Mfg. Corp. v. The Individual
  S.D. Fla.· 2024-09-13
  The court granted Plaintiff's motion for default final judgment, awarding injunctive relief and statutory damages for trademark counterfeiting and infringement.
• Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC v. Hoffner
  S.D. Fla.· 2024-09-13
  The court recommended denying the motion for a temporary restraining order (TRO) and preliminary injunction because the plaintiff failed to meet the requirements for ex parte relief and the request for a preliminary injunction was premature due to lack of notice.
• On Clouds GmbH v. The Individuals
  S.D. Fla.· 2024-09-08
  The court recommended granting the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction, finding a substantial likelihood of success on the merits and irreparable harm if relief is not granted.
• Chanel, Inc. v. The Individuals
  S.D. Fla.· 2024-09-04
  The court granted Plaintiff's motion for default final judgment, finding Defendants liable for trademark counterfeiting and infringement.
• Griffin v. Calderon
  M.D. Fla.· 2024-08-30
  The court held that the plaintiff's emergency motion for a temporary restraining order was denied without prejudice because it failed to comply with the requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65 and Local Rule 6.01.
• Smith v. Fla. Agric. & Mech. Univ. Bd. of Trs.
  M.D. Fla.· 2024-08-30 ·via Presumption Of Irreparable Injury
  The court held that a plaintiff must establish a substantial threat of irreparable injury to obtain a preliminary injunction, and that economic harm and reputational damage from termination are not considered irreparable.
• Rouzard v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.
  M.D. Fla.· 2024-08-29
  The court denied the Commissioner's motion to dismiss without prejudice, finding that the conflicting representations and lack of documentation necessitated further record supplementation.