-
Fla. 5th DCA·
2022-04-07
Publix sought certiorari review of a trial court order sustaining objections to discovery requests directed at Molina's healthcare providers, seeking to uncover potential financial bias and relationships between providers and Molina's law firm. The court dismissed the petition fo
-
Fla. 1st DCA·
2022-03-30
-
S.D. Fla.·
2022-03-28
The court granted in part and denied in part the plaintiffs' motion for default judgment, finding sufficient allegations for copyright infringement, DMCA violations, and trademark infringement against the LiquidVPN Defendants.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2022-03-28
Louis Vuitton Malletier obtained a default judgment against 428 defendants who operated internet-based e-commerce stores and photo albums selling counterfeit goods bearing Louis Vuitton's federally registered trademarks without authorization. The court found the defendants liable
-
S.D. Fla.·
2022-03-25
The court held that the dispute over Spirit Airlines' plan to open a second control center constitutes a 'minor dispute' under the Railway Labor Act, over which federal courts lack subject-matter jurisdiction.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2022-03-24
The court granted defendants' motion to hold plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction in abeyance pending resolution of a motion to stay and a parallel Texas proceeding.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2022-03-22
The court granted Plaintiff's motion for default judgment, awarding statutory damages and injunctive relief against Defendants for trademark counterfeiting and cybersquatting.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2022-03-22
Swiss luxury watch manufacturers Omega SA, Blancpain SA, Longines, and seven other brands sued unnamed defendants operating counterfeit e-commerce websites selling fake versions of their trademarked watches. The court entered default judgment against all defendants after they fai
-
Fla. 3d DCA·
2022-03-16
Hammocks Community Association, Inc. petitioned for a writ of certiorari to challenge a circuit court order in Miami-Dade County. The Third District Court of Appeal dismissed the petition for lack of jurisdiction because the petitioner failed to demonstrate irreparable harm, a ne
-
Fla. 3d DCA·
2022-03-16
Bank of America sought certiorari relief from a trial court order requiring production of documents relating to lost note affidavits, claiming the materials constituted trade secrets. The Third District Court of Appeal granted the petition in part, holding that the trial court fa
-
Fla. 3d DCA·
2022-03-09
In consolidated petitions for writs of certiorari, defendants and a non-party sought to quash a trial court order de-designating confidential deposition testimony while the underlying dispute was pending arbitration. The court held that arbitrators, not trial courts, have exclusi
-
Fla. 3d DCA·
2022-03-09
This case concerns whether a trial court or arbitrators have authority over discovery disputes, specifically regarding the de-designation of confidential information, after a case has been submitted to arbitration. The appellate court held that arbitrators have exclusive authorit
-
S.D. Fla.·
2022-03-08
The court granted the plaintiff's motion for default judgment, awarding statutory damages, injunctive relief, and attorney's fees against defaulting defendants for trademark counterfeiting and infringement.
-
Fla. 1st DCA·
2022-03-04
A petition for writ of certiorari must be dismissed when the petitioner fails to establish irreparable harm, particularly where the trial court has provided an available remedy.
-
Fla. 3d DCA·
2022-03-02
The City of Miami Beach appealed a preliminary injunction granted in favor of the Clevelander Ocean, L.P., restraining enforcement of two ordinances: one rolling back alcohol sales hours and another repealing a decades-old noise exemption. The trial court found the Alcohol Sales
-
Fla. 3d DCA·
2022-03-02
A mother whose minor children were adjudicated dependent petitions for certiorari to quash a non-final order changing her case plan goal from reunification to adoption. The central issue is whether inadmissible hearsay qualifies as "competent evidence" required under Florida Rule
-
M.D. Fla.·
2022-02-28
The court held that plaintiffs failed to demonstrate a substantial likelihood of success on the merits or irreparable harm, thus denying their motion for a preliminary injunction.
-
Fla. 3d DCA·
2022-02-16
Seissa Belmondo appeals a trial court order granting temporary injunctive relief against her for allegedly making defamatory statements about Dr. Edy Amisial. The Third District Court of Appeal reversed, holding that temporary injunctive relief is generally unavailable to prohibi
-
Fla. 3d DCA·
2022-02-16
In a certiorari review of a trial court's denial of a deposition motion, the Third District Court of Appeal held that petitioners were entitled to depose a corporate representative of the Airports Authority of Trinidad and Tobago as a material witness in a racketeering case. The
-
M.D. Fla.·
2022-02-07
The court held that a plaintiff seeking a preliminary injunction must demonstrate irreparable harm, and Florida's statutory presumption of irreparable harm for restrictive covenant violations does not apply in federal court.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2022-02-04
The court held that a temporary restraining order is an extraordinary remedy that requires a substantial likelihood of success on the merits and a substantial threat of irreparable injury, neither of which was demonstrated by the plaintiff.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2022-02-04
The court granted Plaintiff's motion for an ex parte temporary restraining order, finding that the Perishable Agricultural Commodities Act (PACA) trust assets were being dissipated.
-
Fla. 1st DCA·
2022-02-02
This case concerns whether a trial court must conduct an in camera review of a deceased patient's mental health records before ordering their disclosure in a wrongful death lawsuit. The appellate court held that such a review is required to ensure only relevant records are produc
-
S.D. Fla.·
2022-02-01
The court denied the Plaintiff's Emergency Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO).
-
S.D. Fla.·
2022-01-27
The Court held that the Plaintiff's emergency motion to enjoin a parallel lawsuit was an improper use of emergency procedures and denied it.
-
Fla. 3d DCA·
2022-01-19
Denise Riano appealed a summary judgment in favor of Bank of America on her third-party claim for specific performance regarding a loan modification agreement under the federal Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP). The court affirmed the judgment and dismissed her petition
-
Fla. 3d DCA·
2022-01-19
ZDS Construction and Rivera Services Group sought certiorari review of a discovery order requiring production of a written statement prepared by their attorney regarding a witness interview in a wrongful death action. The trial court subsequently reconsidered and issued a revised
-
Fla. 3d DCA·
2022-01-19
This case involves an appeal and a petition for writ of certiorari concerning a borrower's claims for specific performance of a loan modification agreement. The appellate court affirmed the judgment in favor of the Bank and dismissed the petition against FNMA, finding no independ
-
S.D. Fla.·
2022-01-11
The court granted Plaintiff's motion for entry of final default judgment against Defendants for trademark, copyright, and patent infringement.
-
Fla. 3d DCA·
2022-01-05
Belinda Meruelo, the mother of one party to a dissolution of marriage proceeding and a third-party defendant, sought certiorari review of the trial court's denial of her motions to stay the proceeding pending adjudication of her motions to disqualify the opposing party's forensic
-
M.D. Fla.·
2021-12-28
The court held that the plaintiff failed to prove a substantial likelihood of success on the merits or irreparable harm, thus denying the motion for a preliminary injunction.
-
Fla. 2d DCA·
2021-12-22
-
Del. Ch.·
2021-12-14
The court granted Hologram's motion for a preliminary injunction, enjoining Caplan from pursuing arbitration. The court found that Hologram was likely to succeed on the merits because no binding agreement to arbitrate was formed, as Caplan's response to the stock purchase agreeme
-
M.D. Fla.·
2021-11-22
A plaintiff seeking preliminary injunctive relief must establish irreparable harm, which cannot be remedied by monetary damages.
-
Fla. 3d DCA·
2021-11-17
Christa Adkins sought certiorari review of a trial court order granting a protective order that precluded her from deposing non-party psychologist Dr. Michelle Hintz. The trial court found that Dr. Hintz had produced her complete file to Adkins and that Adkins had failed to estab
-
M.D. Fla.·
2021-11-12
The court held that the plaintiff failed to demonstrate irreparable harm, a prerequisite for injunctive relief, and that the complaint lacked a sufficient basis for federal jurisdiction.
-
Fla. 1st DCA·
2021-11-10
The appellate court dismissed a petition for certiorari relief, finding that it lacked jurisdiction because the petitioners failed to demonstrate irreparable harm. The court held that challenges to the qualifications of a medical expert, as opposed to procedural compliance issues
-
Fla. 3d DCA·
2021-11-03
AmeriGas Propane appeals a trial court's denial of a motion for temporary injunctive relief against former employee Nelson Sanchez and his new employer Blossman Gas for alleged breach of non-compete and non-solicitation agreements. The appellate court reverses, finding that Ameri
-
Del. Ch.·
2021-10-13
The Delaware Court of Chancery held that the plaintiffs failed to comply with the company's advance notice bylaw by omitting material information regarding supporters of their nomination slate and potential conflicts of interest related to a past acquisition proposal. The court f
-
S.D. Fla.·
2021-10-13
The court denied plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction, finding they failed to demonstrate a likelihood of success on their trademark infringement claim or a clear showing for their breach of contract claims, and also failed to show irreparable harm due to their delay.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2021-10-08
The court held that a motion for preliminary injunction must comply with local rules and that the plaintiff failed to establish irreparable harm due to significant delay.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2021-09-28
YETI Coolers, LLC obtained a temporary restraining order against 60 defendants operating websites that advertised and sold counterfeit YETI-branded products in violation of the Lanham Act. The court found that YETI demonstrated a substantial likelihood of success on the merits, i
-
Fla. 5th DCA·
2021-09-23
The appellate court denied Lifestream's petition for certiorari, upholding the trial court's decision to deny Lifestream's motion to dismiss. The court found that the estate's complaint, as pled, sounded in general negligence, not medical malpractice, and thus did not require spe
-
Fla. 3d DCA·
2021-09-22
A petitioner must demonstrate irreparable harm that cannot be remedied on direct appeal as a condition precedent to invoking a district court's certiorari jurisdiction.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2021-09-21
The court granted the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction, enjoining defendants from infringing on the plaintiff's trademarks, copyrights, and patent.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2021-09-21
The court granted plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction, enjoining defendants from manufacturing, selling, or distributing infringing products and from concealing assets.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2021-09-15
The court held that the inmate's motion for injunctive relief was denied because he failed to demonstrate a substantial likelihood of success on the merits or actual and imminent irreparable harm, and the court generally defers to prison administration.
-
Fla. 3d DCA·
2021-09-15
A petition for certiorari must be dismissed without prejudice when the petitioner has not established irreparable harm that cannot be remedied on direct appeal, and direct appellate review remains available.
-
Fla. 1st DCA·
2021-09-15
A defendant charged with drug felonies and resisting an officer sought a writ of certiorari to quash a trial court order compelling disclosure of his cell phone passcode for execution of a search warrant, arguing it violated the Fifth Amendment. The court dismissed the petition f
-
Fla. 3d DCA·
2021-09-08
A party seeking certiorari review of a discovery order must establish irreparable harm as a condition precedent to invoking appellate jurisdiction.