Irreparable Harm

2,255 Florida cases classified under this topic · sorted by citation count · see the citation graph · browse and sort

• Miner, Ltd. v. Sanacore
  M.D. Fla.· 2025-07-16
  The court held that the plaintiff failed to demonstrate a substantial likelihood of success on the merits or irreparable harm, thus denying the motion for a preliminary injunction.
• Hair v. Equifax Info. Servs. LLC
  M.D. Fla.· 2025-07-07
  The court denied the parties' joint motion to stay remaining pretrial deadlines pending a ruling on summary judgment motions.
• Simpson v. Orlando Health S. Lake Hosp.
  M.D. Fla.· 2025-06-30
  The court held that the plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction must be denied because she failed to establish a likelihood of success on the merits, specifically the 'color of law' element required for a § 1983 claim.
• Simpson v. Orlando Health S. Lake Hosp.
  M.D. Fla.· 2025-06-30
  The court held that the plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction must be denied because she failed to establish a likelihood of success on the merits of her § 1983 claim.
• Panamerica Trade, Inc. v. Boys
  M.D. Fla.· 2025-06-20
  The court denied the motion for a preliminary injunction because the plaintiff's significant delay in seeking relief undermined its claim of irreparable harm.
• Wiendl v. Wiendl
  Fla. 2d DCA· 2025-06-20
  A trial court may restrict a litigant's right to self-representation upon a showing of egregious abuse of the judicial process, but such a restriction cannot be imposed without providing the litigant notice and an opportunity to be heard, as the failure to do so constitutes a dep
• Geico Gen. Ins. Co. v. Hines
  Fla. 1st DCA· 2025-06-18
  GEICO petitioned for a writ of certiorari to challenge a trial court decision affecting its right to a statutorily mandated procedure. The First District Court of Appeal dismissed the petition for lack of jurisdiction because GEICO failed to establish irreparable harm.
• Abdul v. Inch
  N.D. Fla.· 2025-06-09
  The court denied the plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction.
• Stache Prods., LLC v. Green Bros. Wholesale Inc.
  M.D. Fla.· 2025-05-29
  The court granted default judgment for patent and trademark infringement, finding the defendant's admitted actions constituted infringement and that a permanent injunction was warranted.
• Tillman Nature Preserve, LLC v. Babush
  Fla. 2d DCA· 2025-05-21
  The Tillmans and the Estate of Edna Poche were not indispensable parties to TNP's quiet title action because TNP sought only to quiet title to the property and disclaimed relief concerning easements or access rights, and under § 65.041, a judgment would not bind non-parties or af
• Green v. Galencare Inc
  M.D. Fla.· 2025-05-20
  The court recommended denying the plaintiff's motion for expedited discovery and a temporary restraining order.
• Shenzhen Dejiayun Network Tech. Co.
  S.D. Fla.· 2025-05-19
  A Chinese company with a federally registered trademark for clothing called "BAGILAANOE" sued a defendant, Chenxi Li, who was selling counterfeit products bearing that mark through a deceptive online store operated under a fraudulently used Florida business name. The court grante
• Ajugwe v. Noem
  M.D. Fla.· 2025-05-12
  The court held that the termination of the plaintiff's SEVIS status was likely arbitrary and capricious, violating the APA and Due Process Clause, and granted a preliminary injunction.
• St. Clair v. GM Fin.
  S.D. Fla.· 2025-04-28
  The court denied the plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order because he failed to establish irreparable injury or that the relief would serve the public interest.
• Ajugwe v. Noem
  M.D. Fla.· 2025-04-18
  The court granted the plaintiff's emergency motion for a temporary restraining order, finding he was likely to succeed on the merits of his claims that his SEVIS record was unlawfully terminated.
• Tissot SA v. The Individuals
  S.D. Fla.· 2025-04-17
  Tissot SA, a luxury watch manufacturer, sought default judgment against defendants operating counterfeit e-commerce stores under the names rotwatches.com and salestoretoday.com that were selling goods bearing counterfeit versions of Tissot's federally registered trademarks. The c
• Dante v. Yaffa
  S.D. Fla.· 2025-03-25
  The court granted the defendants' motion to set aside the clerk's default, finding they met the minimum showing required for good cause under Rule 55(c).
• Vasallo TV Grp., LLC v. America-CV Station Grp., Inc.
  S.D. Fla.· 2025-03-18
  The court denied the motion for a stay pending appeal because the appellants failed to satisfy all four required factors, particularly the likelihood of irreparable harm.
• Rodrigo Troy Prichard v. Galicia
  Fla. 3d DCA· 2025-03-12
  In a marital dissolution action, the petitioner challenges a civil contempt order imposing a $1,000 daily coercive fine for failure to comply with prior agreed orders regarding financial discovery and temporary support. The Third District Court of Appeal granted certiorari review
• Chanel, Inc. v. 21948352
  S.D. Fla.· 2025-03-07
  The court granted Plaintiff's motion for default final judgment, awarding statutory damages and permanent injunctive relief against the Defendant for trademark counterfeiting and infringement.
• Mycarrier, LLC v. PROJECT44, LLC
  Del. Ch.· 2025-03-03
  The court denied Project44's motion for a preliminary injunction, finding that while Project44 was likely to succeed on its breach of contract claims, it failed to demonstrate a likelihood of irreparable harm. The alleged harm, primarily lost revenue from a single customer accoun
• High Rd. Constr. Inc. v. Peegz I, LLC
  Fla. 3d DCA· 2025-02-26
  A construction contractor challenging adequacy of a court deposit under section 713.24, Florida Statutes, must establish both irreparable harm and a departure from the essential requirements of law; the trial court did not depart from essential requirements by finding a $121,669.
• Hammer Brand, LLC v. Voro Inc.
  M.D. Fla.· 2025-02-24
  A party seeking a stay of a permanent injunction pending appeal must make a strong showing of likely success on the merits and irreparable injury, which the defendants failed to do.
• Fla. Dep't of Child. & Families v. Foster Parents of K.J.
  Fla. 3d DCA· 2025-02-19
  The Florida Department of Children and Families sought to change a child's custody from his long-term caregivers to a maternal aunt for adoption and sibling reunification. The court holds that caregivers are entitled to party status under section 39.522(3) only if they qualify fo
• Jaeger v. State
  Fla. 2d DCA· 2025-02-12
  Amy Jaeger challenged two subpoenas seeking her medical records filed by the State in a criminal case involving attempted murder, armed burglary, and aggravated assault. The Florida District Court of Appeal granted her certiorari petition and quashed the subpoenas, holding that t
• Natco, LLC v. Carl
  Fla. 5th DCA· 2025-02-07
  NATCO, LLC appealed a temporary injunction granted in a Circuit Court case against the Carls. The appellees confessed error, and the Fifth District Court of Appeal reversed the injunction order, vacating the temporary injunction.
• Hurley v. Schanz
  Fla. 6th DCA· 2025-02-07
  Petitioner sought a writ of certiorari to quash a discovery order compelling disclosure of his personal finances and business information in connection with a domesticated North Carolina default judgment. The court held that while personal financial information is constitutionall
• Fokiss, Inc. v. TLM Global, LLC
  S.D. Fla.· 2025-01-31
  The court adopted the magistrate judge's report and recommendation, granting TLM Global's motion for a preliminary injunction and denying Fokiss's motion.
• Soka Gakkai International-USA v. United States Army Corps of Eng'rs
  S.D. Fla.· 2025-01-31
  The court recommended denying the plaintiffs' emergency motion for a preliminary injunction because they failed to demonstrate a substantial likelihood of success on the merits or a substantial threat of actual and imminent irreparable injury.
• Darin Engelhardt v. Lara Aronoff
  Fla. 3d DCA· 2025-01-15
  Darin Engelhardt petitioned for a writ of certiorari challenging a discovery order from the trial court. The Third District Court of Appeal denied the petition, applying established standards for certiorari review of discovery orders and principles governing relevancy in discover
• Swiler v. RSJ Ventures, LLC
  M.D. Fla.· 2025-01-07
  The court denied the request for a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) because the defendant had appeared and responded to the motion. The request for a preliminary injunction was taken under advisement.
• Brenton Marckese v. Del. Solid Waste Auth.
  Del. Ch.· 2025-01-03
  The Court of Chancery denied the plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order to retrieve his deceased horse's remains from a landfill. The court found that while it had subject matter jurisdiction under the clean-up doctrine, the plaintiff failed to demonstrate that the
• Alsaloussi v. Drummond
  Fla. 3d DCA· 2025-01-02
  Mohammed Alsaloussi and Alsaloussi Holdings, LLC appealed a trial court's order granting an emergency temporary injunction that prohibited them from liquidating, selling, or disposing of a 2018 Porsche 911 Turbo Classic pending final judgment. The appellate court affirmed the inj
• Ford v. Niemi
  S.D. Fla.· 2025-01-02
  The court denied the plaintiff's emergency motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction because she failed to establish a substantial likelihood of success on the merits, demonstrate irreparable harm without an adequate legal remedy, provide for security, a
• Smith-Fullerton v. Fullerton
  Fla. 5th DCA· 2024-12-06
  Sandra Katherine Smith-Fullerton petitioned for a writ of certiorari to quash the trial court's order requiring full financial disclosure in her divorce proceedings. The appellate court granted the petition because the trial court failed to first determine the validity of the par
• Baptist Hosp. of Miami, Inc. v. Llauro
  Fla. 3d DCA· 2024-12-04
  Baptist Hospital of Miami sought a writ of certiorari to review a trial court order excluding evidence. The appellate court dismissed the petition, holding that exclusion of evidence in civil cases does not constitute irreparable harm because any error can be corrected on appeal
• GoPro, Inc. v. The Individuals
  S.D. Fla.· 2024-11-19
  The court recommended granting Plaintiff's motion for entry of final default judgment against defendants for copyright infringement, trademark counterfeiting, false designation of origin, and unfair competition.
• DAY v. Hydrologic Distrib. Co.
  Fla. 2d DCA· 2024-11-15
  Former employees of Hydrologic Distribution Company appeal a trial court's grant of a temporary injunction preventing them from competing with their former employer and soliciting its customers and employees. The appellate court affirmed, holding that Hydrologic established legit
• Malletier v. The Individuals
  S.D. Fla.· 2024-11-08
  The court recommended granting a preliminary injunction against defendants for trademark counterfeiting and infringement, finding a substantial likelihood of success on the merits and irreparable harm.
• Blue Condo. Ass'n, Inc. v. Blue Grouper Ventures, LLC
  Fla. 3d DCA· 2024-10-30
  Blue Condominium Association appeals a judgment awarding Blue Grouper Ventures damages and a permanent injunction for breach of the Declaration and trespass. The appellate court affirmed the underlying judgment but reversed the award of prejudgment interest from 2014 and the perm
• Chanel, Inc. v. 21913657
  S.D. Fla.· 2024-10-22
  The court granted Plaintiff's motion for default final judgment, awarding injunctive relief and statutory damages for trademark counterfeiting and infringement.
• Purple Innovation, LLC v. The Individuals
  S.D. Fla.· 2024-10-22
  The court recommends granting the motion to dismiss because the complaint is an impermissible shotgun pleading, failing to provide adequate notice of the claims against each defendant.
• Chanel, Inc. v. The Individuals
  S.D. Fla.· 2024-10-09
  The court granted Plaintiff's motion for default final judgment, finding Defendants liable for trademark counterfeiting and infringement.
• Fanatics, LLC v. fanatic2023.net
  S.D. Fla.· 2024-09-30
  The court granted Plaintiff's motion for default final judgment against Defendant.
• Socket Solutions, LLC v. Imp. Global, LLC
  S.D. Fla.· 2024-09-29
  The Court affirmed the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, granting Plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction and overruling Defendant's objections.
• Pringle v. Seminole Cnty. Pub. Schs.
  M.D. Fla.· 2024-09-23
  The court denied the plaintiff's emergency motion for a temporary injunction because it failed to comply with procedural rules and substantive requirements.
• Fleming v. Strong
  N.D. Fla.· 2024-09-18
  The court recommended denying the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction and dismissing claims against certain defendants for improper joinder, recommending remand.
• Marques Machado v. Mayorkas
  M.D. Fla.· 2024-09-13
  The court granted in part Plaintiffs' motion for a temporary restraining order, finding they established a substantial likelihood of success on their APA claim and demonstrated irreparable harm, a favorable balance of harms, and that the order would not disserve the public intere
• Karsten Mfg. Corp. v. The Individual
  S.D. Fla.· 2024-09-13
  The court granted Plaintiff's motion for default final judgment, awarding injunctive relief and statutory damages for trademark counterfeiting and infringement.
• First Born Again Baptist of N. Miami, Inc. v. First Baptist Church of Greater Miami
  Fla. 3d DCA· 2024-09-11
  First Born Again Baptist appeals from a trial court order granting First Baptist Church of Greater Miami a temporary injunction to restore access to a church property. The court rejected First Born's res judicata defense based on a prior dismissed action and found the injunction