-
990 F. Supp. 1406·
S.D. Fla.·
1997-02-13
·cited 1×
The court affirmed the magistrate judge's recommendation to grant Shell's motion for a preliminary injunction, finding that Shell was likely to succeed on the merits and would suffer irreparable harm.
-
926 F. Supp. 1540·
N.D. Fla.·
1996-05-24
·cited 1×
The court denied the motion for a stay of remedial proceedings pending appeal, finding the movants failed to meet the burden for extraordinary relief. The court later granted reconsideration and vacated its prior order extending qualifying deadlines, deferring to the state legisl
-
751 F. Supp. 1323·
M.D. Fla.·
1994-03-31
·cited 1×
The court held that the D'Oench, Duhme doctrine and 12 U.S.C. § 1823(e) barred the plaintiffs' claims based on alleged unwritten promises for end loan financing, and also defeated the plaintiffs' affirmative defenses to the FDIC's counterclaims.
-
999 F.2d 211·
7th Cir.·
1993-07-08
·cited 1×
The court held that a district court has the authority to grant a temporary restraining order in an arbitrable dispute to preserve the status quo, but this authority does not extend indefinitely once arbitration has commenced.
-
992 F.2d 430·
2d Cir.·
1993-04-28
·cited 1×
A status quo injunction pending arbitration, when based on a contract's status quo provision, must be analyzed under specific performance principles, not preliminary injunction standards.
-
977 F.2d 86·
3d Cir.·
1992-10-13
·cited 1×
The court held that Campbell failed to make a clear showing of immediate irreparable harm, which is required for a preliminary injunction.
-
924 F.2d 98·
6th Cir.·
1991-01-22
·cited 1×
The court affirmed the denial of a preliminary injunction, finding that the plaintiff failed to demonstrate irreparable harm and that the issue of injunctive relief under Rule 65 is governed by federal procedural law.
-
909 F.2d 59·
2d Cir.·
1990-07-13
·cited 1×
The court held that a preliminary injunction was improperly granted because the plaintiff's oral dealership agreement claim is likely barred by the New York statute of frauds due to inconsistent representations about its duration.
-
889 F.2d 1327·
4th Cir.·
1989-11-22
·cited 1×
The court held that the district court did not abuse its discretion in granting a preliminary injunction to prevent Singer from dissipating assets and in denying Singer's motion to approve certain transactions.
-
712 F. Supp. 176·
S.D. Fla.·
1988-09-21
·cited 1×
The court held that the developer's denial of access to a franchised cable company to install its system in public rights-of-way and easements was an attempt to prevent competition and was unenforceable under the Cable Act.
-
676 F. Supp. 244·
S.D. Fla.·
1988-01-08
·cited 1×
The court denied the application for a preliminary injunction, finding that the plaintiffs failed to establish entitlement to such relief.
-
622 F. Supp. 201·
S.D. Fla.·
1985-11-13
·cited 1×
The court held that the plaintiffs failed to establish the necessary elements for a preliminary injunction, specifically a likelihood of success on the merits and irreparable harm.
-
665 F.2d 395·
1st Cir.·
1981-11-12
·cited 1×
A federal court injunction to compel a state court to conduct proceedings in English is barred by the Younger doctrine, absent compelling circumstances and a showing of irreparable harm.
-
Fla. 3d DCA·
2026-09-02
A trial court violates a party's due process rights when it imposes sanctions sua sponte without proper notice and an opportunity to be heard.
-
Fla. 5th DCA·
2026-05-08
A court-appointed psychologist is afforded absolute immunity from negligence claims arising from his preparation of a parenting plan recommendation during a divorce custody proceeding, as the litigation privilege protects any act occurring during the course of a judicial proceedi
-
Fla. 4th DCA·
2026-03-25
The Fourth District Court of Appeal of Florida dismissed an appeal of a partial final judgment, finding it premature because interdependent claims remained unresolved. However, the court granted a petition for writ of certiorari to address the immediate execution of the judgment,
-
Fla. 6th DCA·
2026-03-20
The Sixth District Court of Appeal dismissed a petition for writ of certiorari challenging a discovery-related order, holding that the petitioners failed to establish irreparable harm—a jurisdictional requirement for the extraordinary remedy of certiorari.
-
Fla. 6th DCA·
2026-03-17
Roger Salazar petitioned for a writ of certiorari to quash a trial court's order granting partition and ordering the sale of a jointly owned home. The appellate court granted the petition, finding the trial court departed from essential requirements of law by granting judgment of
-
Fla. 4th DCA·
2026-03-11
DigitalBridge Partners sought certiorari review of a trial court's denial of their motion to stay proceedings in a Palm Beach County action pending resolution of a related, first-filed action in Miami-Dade County involving the same Software Development Agreement. The Florida Four
-
Fla. 2d DCA·
2026-03-06
A father sought certiorari review of a circuit court order denying his motion for reunification with his dependent child. The appellate court granted the petition and quashed the order, finding that the circuit court departed from the essential requirements of law by failing to m
-
Fla. 5th DCA·
2026-03-06
The NCAA appeals a trial court's issuance of a temporary injunction requiring it to grant Doctor Bradley eligibility to compete in college basketball for the 2025-2026 season, waiving the NCAA's Five-Year Rule. The appellate court quashes the injunction, finding the trial court's
-
Fla. 3d DCA·
2026-02-25
A petition for certiorari review was dismissed for failure to demonstrate irreparable harm, which is a condition precedent for invoking district court certiorari jurisdiction. The court reaffirmed that harm must be of an irreparable nature and not remediable on appeal from a fina
-
Del. Ch.·
2026-01-21
MyCarrier seeks attorneys' fees as the prevailing party after the court denied Project 44's motion for preliminary injunction. The court stayed the fee award pending final resolution of the underlying breach of contract dispute in arbitration, finding substantial overlap between
-
S.D. Fla.·
2026-01-12
A plaintiff must demonstrate irreparable harm to obtain a preliminary injunction, and a mere showing of a constitutional violation, or speculative harm to principals, or the potential for later corrective action, does not meet this standard.
-
11th Cir.·
2026-01-09
Four nonresident activists challenged Atlanta's requirement that signature gatherers on local referendum petitions be city residents, claiming it violated their First Amendment rights, and the district court granted their preliminary injunction. The Eleventh Circuit reversed, hol
-
S.D. Fla.·
2026-01-09
The court denied the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction because she failed to establish a substantial likelihood of success on the merits.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2026-01-05
The court granted in part and denied in part motions to strike affirmative defenses, treating some as denials, striking others as improper defenses, and allowing some to proceed.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-12-16
The court granted the plaintiff's ex parte motion for a temporary restraining order, finding a substantial likelihood of success on the merits for breach of contract and irreparable harm.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-11-26
The court denied Plaintiff's emergency motion for a temporary restraining order because it failed to demonstrate immediate and irreparable harm and provide sufficient justification for ex parte relief.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2025-11-14
The court held that the plaintiff's claim for declaratory relief was a disguised breach of contract claim, subject to arbitration, and that the plaintiff failed to demonstrate grounds for a preliminary injunction.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-11-07
The court held that plaintiffs failed to establish irreparable harm, a prerequisite for injunctive relief.
-
Del. Ch.·
2025-10-31
The Court of Chancery dismissed the plaintiff's complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, finding that the plaintiff failed to properly invoke the court's equitable jurisdiction. The court held that simply requesting injunctive relief or including contractual provisions
-
Del. Ch.·
2025-10-31
The court granted the plaintiffs' motion for an antisuit injunction, enjoining the defendant from prosecuting her claims in New York. The court found that valid Delaware forum selection clauses in the corporate charter and financing agreements required the defendant to litigate h
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-10-21
The court granted in part and deferred in part the plaintiff's motion for injunctive relief, issuing a temporary restraining order against the defendant.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-10-20
The court granted Plaintiff's motion for final default judgment, permanently enjoining Defendants from infringing Plaintiff's trademarks and ordering the transfer of the offending domain name.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-10-17
The court denied the plaintiffs' motion for a temporary restraining order because they failed to meet the required legal standards.
-
Del. Ch.·
2025-10-05
The court denied the plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order (TRO) enjoining the closing of a stock-for-stock merger. The court found that the plaintiff failed to demonstrate a colorable claim, imminent irreparable harm, or that the balance of equities favored granti
-
S.D. Fla.·
2025-09-30
The court granted in part Plaintiff's motion for default final judgment, finding the Defendant liable for trademark infringement and counterfeiting and awarding injunctive relief and statutory damages.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-09-26
The court held that the plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction should be denied because they failed to demonstrate irreparable harm and unduly delayed in seeking relief.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2025-09-19
The court recommended granting Plaintiff's motion for entry of final default judgment against the remaining defendants for trademark and design patent infringement.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2025-09-13
The court recommended granting Plaintiff's motion for default final judgment, finding that the well-pleaded allegations sufficiently established liability for trademark counterfeiting, infringement, false designation of origin, cybersquatting, and unfair competition.
-
Fla.·
2025-08-28
The Florida Supreme Court adopted amendments to Florida Probate Rule 5.920 to conform the rule to 2025 legislation (Chapter 2025-158) that established a new process for substitute service on unascertainable respondents in vulnerable adult exploitation injunction proceedings. The
-
Fla. 4th DCA·
2025-08-27
The Fourth District Court of Appeal affirmed a homeowners association's right to obtain injunctive relief against homeowners for violating restrictive covenants regarding lawn maintenance, holding that an association is not required to prove irreparable harm or lack of adequate r
-
S.D. Fla.·
2025-08-22
Fender Musical Instruments Corporation brought a federal trademark counterfeiting and infringement action against an anonymous online seller operating e-commerce stores that sold counterfeit goods bearing Fender's registered trademarks without authorization. The court granted Fen
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-08-14
The court denied Plaintiff's emergency motion for temporary injunctive relief because he failed to satisfy the requirements of Rule 65 and local rules.
-
Fla. 3d DCA·
2025-08-13
Elvis Cruz appeals a summary judgment order and an attorney's fees award from a dispute over the redevelopment of a historic Miami building. The court dismisses the summary judgment appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the Developer's counterclaim remains pending and is inextr
-
S.D. Fla.·
2025-08-12
Tottenham Hotspur Limited sued unknown defendants who operated counterfeit e-commerce stores selling unauthorized merchandise bearing Tottenham's federally registered trademarks without authorization. The court granted Tottenham's motion for default judgment on trademark counterf
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-08-12
The court denied the motion for a Temporary Restraining Order and took the motion for a preliminary injunction under advisement.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2025-08-07
The court recommended granting Plaintiff's ex parte motion for a temporary restraining order, finding a substantial likelihood of success on the merits regarding breach of non-compete agreements and irreparable harm.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-07-31
The court held that the plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction is denied without prejudice because the plaintiff failed to meet the required legal standards.