Injunctive Order

25 Florida cases classified under this topic · sorted by citation count · see the citation graph · browse and sort

• Flagship Nat'l Bank OF Miami v. Gray Distrib. Sys., Inc.
  432 So. 2d 660· Fla. 3d DCA· 1983-06-01 ·cited 187×
• Wilson v. Sandstrom
  317 So. 2d 732· Fla.· 1975-07-21 ·cited 102×
  Greyhound kennel owners were incarcerated for civil contempt after refusing to comply with a temporary mandatory injunction requiring them to supply racing greyhounds to a track operator. The Florida Supreme Court upheld the injunction and contempt convictions, holding that a tem
• Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Cambria Clay Prods. Co.
  215 F.2d 48· 6th Cir.· 1954-07-07 ·cited 64×
  The court held that while some employee discharges and strike-related issues were supported by evidence of unfair labor practices, the company did not refuse to bargain in good faith, and further evidence was needed regarding contempt findings for certain employees.
• Fla. Ventilated Awning Co., Inc. v. Dickson
  67 So. 2d 218· Fla.· 1953-07-28 ·cited 47×
  Florida Ventilated Awning Company and others appeal a contempt order for violating an injunctive decree that prohibited use of the word 'ventilated' in their business name and advertising. The Florida Supreme Court reversed the contempt finding, holding that the defendants lacked
• Int'l Bhd. OF Teamsters v. W. Pa. Motor Carriers Ass'n
  660 F.2d 76· 3d Cir.· 1981-09-25 ·cited 24×
  The court held that the injunction against employers with whom the union had no contract exceeded the court's jurisdiction under Section 301.
• Bd. OF Med. Exam'rs & Dep't of Prof'l Reg. v. Hooshang Kadi VAR, M.D.
  482 So. 2d 501· Fla. 4th DCA· 1986-01-22 ·cited 16×
  The Board of Medical Examiners appeals a circuit court order denying its motion to dismiss and finding it in contempt for allegedly violating a temporary restraining order that prohibited consideration of a doctor's nolo contendere plea in administrative license revocation procee
• Thermice Corp. v. Vistron Corp.
  832 F.2d 248· 3d Cir.· 1987-10-29 ·cited 14×
  A civil contempt order that declares a party would be in violation of a prior injunction if it takes certain actions, without imposing sanctions or finding actual damages, is appealable as a declaratory judgment. The court affirmed the district court's interpretation of the contr
• Smith v. Roscoe L. Eggar
  655 F.2d 181· 9th Cir.· 1981-08-31 ·cited 14×
  The court held that the district court had jurisdiction and that the Commissioner could not rescind the agreement based on the taxpayer's removal of papers from a bank vault, as the agreement was not ambiguous and the removal did not violate its terms.
• Vance v. Fla. Reduction Corp.
  263 So. 2d 585· Fla. 1st DCA· 1972-04-18 ·cited 10×
  Earl and Anita Vance appealed a judgment in favor of Florida Reduction Corporation requiring them to forfeit usurious interest charged on a loan. The court affirmed, holding that the statute of limitations for usury claims runs from the date of payment rather than default, and th
• Ransburg Electro-Coating Corp. v. Ionic Electrostatic Corp.
  395 F.2d 92· 4th Cir.· 1968-04-11 ·cited 10×
  The court held that the defendant was not in contempt because the electrostatic forces in its new devices were insubstantial and did not exceed those present in the prior art, thus not infringing the plaintiff's patents.
• In re the Receivership OF Guar. Sec. Life Ins. Co. v. State
  678 So. 2d 828· Fla. 1st DCA· 1996-06-19 ·cited 8×
  A receivership court has no statutory authority under section 631.041 to partially lift the automatic stay to allow a receiver to be named as a nominal defendant in an action against third parties, nor to prohibit discovery from the receiver without express authorization.
• E. T. Simonds Constr. Co. v. Local 1330 OF Int'l HOD Carriers, Bldg. & Common Laborers Union OF Am., AFL-CIO
  315 F.2d 291· 7th Cir.· 1963-03-14 ·cited 8×
  The court held that a party can waive its right to arbitration through undue delay and failure to appeal a prior denial of a stay, even if the underlying dispute is arbitrable.
• THE Florida BAR v. McPHEE
  195 So. 2d 552· Fla.· 1967-02-01 ·cited 7×
  The Court declined to disturb its prior ruling in Cooperman v. West Coast Title Company, and issued an injunctive order consistent with that precedent.
• Art Lewis v. Kelly
  75 So. 2d 761· Fla.· 1954-09-24 ·cited 6×
  Art Lewis seeks to quash an injunctive order issued without bond by a circuit court judge who had not previously participated in the underlying equity case. The Florida Supreme Court holds that while the judge had authority to issue the injunction, he erred in failing to require
• Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. Ormont Drug & Chem. Co., Inc.
  739 F.2d 654· D.C. Cir.· 1984-07-27 ·cited 5×
  The court held that a contempt order should not issue if the party demonstrates an inability to comply with the court's order, and the district court erred by failing to properly consider Ormont's claim of impossibility.
• Dial v. Coler
  791 F.2d 78· 7th Cir.· 1986-05-15 ·cited 4×
  The Eleventh Amendment bars claims for notice and declaratory relief when there is no ongoing violation of federal law to enjoin, and the claims of the Vondran subclass are not ripe for review due to a lack of a concrete dispute about current state policy.
• Reiter v. Universal Marion Corp.
  273 F.2d 820· D.C. Cir.· 1959-12-10 ·cited 4×
  The court held that the appeals were moot due to the New York settlement and vacated prior orders, allowing the District of Columbia suit to proceed without prejudice.
• Inteam Assocs., LLC v. Heartland Payment Sys., LLC
  2018 WL 1560058· Del. Ch.· 2021-10-29 ·cited 3×
  The court denied inTEAM's motion for a rule to show cause, finding that Heartland did not violate the prior injunction. The court held that Heartland's software's ability to export data, its proposals to state agencies, and its alleged data analysis functionality did not constitu
• Northbrook Prop. & Cas. Co., Inc. v. The Honorable Roger B. Colton
  641 So. 2d 440· Fla. 4th DCA· 1994-08-10 ·cited 3×
  Northbrook Property and Casualty Company sought a writ of prohibition to prevent a trial court from exercising jurisdiction over a pending motion regarding an injunction issued in connection with a fraudulent medical malpractice settlement. The Fourth District Court of Appeal gra
• Gay Poling v. City Bank & Tr. Co. OF ST. Petersburg
  189 So. 2d 176· Fla. 2d DCA· 1966-07-20 ·cited 1×
  This appeal addresses the reasonableness of guardian and attorney fees allowed by a county judge in an incompetency proceeding. The District Court of Appeal reversed the lower court's fee awards, finding them excessive, and exercised its statutory authority to set its own reasona
• Metro. Ice Palace, Inc. v. Taber
  143 Fla. 825· Fla.· 1940-08-02 ·cited 1×
  The Florida Supreme Court affirmed a lower court's order due to an equal division among the justices, meaning the appellate court could not reach a majority decision to overturn the lower court's ruling.
• Smith Barney, Inc. v. Hyland
  891 F. Supp. 247· M.D. Fla.· 1997-06-09
  The court granted in part and denied in part the plaintiff's motion to enforce judgment, finding that while past noncompliance with court orders would be excused, future noncompliance would constitute contempt.
• The Marine Bank OF Monroe Cnty. v. Richard C. Milstein Ad Litem in the Guardianship of Madeline Laughead
  533 So. 2d 891· Fla. 3d DCA· 1988-11-08
  Marine Bank of Monroe County violated a court order freezing the assets of an incompetent ward by unilaterally setting off unpaid loans against the ward's account and initiating foreclosure proceedings on her homestead. The trial court found the bank in civil contempt and ordered
• In re Long Island Lighting Co. v. Alker
  244 F.2d 499· 2d Cir.· 1957-05-03
  The court held that the denial of the plaintiffs' motion to proceed with their fraud and conspiracy claims was proper, as it was not within the scope of previously granted leave to reopen and lacked new evidence. The court also affirmed an injunctive order restraining further lit