Injunction

5,622 Florida cases classified under this topic, plus 6,126 listed through its narrower topics · sorted by citation count · see the citation graph · browse and sort

• Rich v. Hershey
  408 F.2d 944· 10th Cir.· 1969-04-01 ·cited 18×·via Action For Injunction
  The court held that the plaintiff was not entitled to an absolute statutory right to a I-S classification because his prior II-S deferment as a graduate student fell under the exceptions to the I-S classification, and therefore, judicial review was barred by § 10(b)(3) of the Mil
• Nelms v. United Ass'n of Journeymen & Apprentices of the Plumbing & Pipe Fitting Indus. of the United States & Canada
  405 F.2d 715· 5th Cir.· 1968-12-23 ·cited 18×·via Preliminary Injunction
  The court held that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying a preliminary injunction to reinstate the plaintiff to union office and membership.
• Aerosonic Corp. & MacLeod Instrument Corp. v. Trodyne Corp.
  402 F.2d 223· 5th Cir.· 1968-10-07 ·cited 18×
  The court held that the injunction was properly granted, but the award of damages, including attorney fees and damages for interference with business relations and disparagement, was not supported by the evidence under Florida law.
• Magnesium Casting Co. v. Hoban
  401 F.2d 516· 1st Cir.· 1968-09-10 ·cited 18×·via Interlocutory Injunction
  The court held that the employer waived its right to challenge the election by complying with the Board's order, even after a precedent invalidated the order's basis.
• Liberty Lobby, Inc. v. Drew Pearson
  390 F.2d 489· D.C. Cir.· 1967-12-27 ·cited 18×·via Preliminary Injunction
  The court held that the denial of a temporary injunction was proper because monetary damages were an adequate remedy at law and there was no basis for equitable relief.
• Rotenberg v. City OF Fort Pierce
  202 So. 2d 782· Fla. 4th DCA· 1967-09-29 ·cited 18×
  A junk yard operator appealed an injunction requiring compliance with a city zoning ordinance that imposed setback requirements and mandated fencing or vegetative screening. The appellate court upheld the ordinance's constitutionality and the availability of injunctive relief, bu
• Brigadier General Walter P. Leber v. Canal Zone Cent. Labor Union & Metal Trades Council, AFL-CIO
  383 F.2d 110· 5th Cir.· 1967-07-25 ·cited 18×
• Othal L. Turner & On-The-Town, Inc. v. H M H Publ'g Co., Inc.
  380 F.2d 224· 5th Cir.· 1967-07-10 ·cited 18×
  The court held that the plaintiffs established a secondary meaning for their 'Playboy' and 'Playmate' marks in connection with night clubs and restaurants, justifying an injunction against the defendants' confusingly similar use.
• King v. United Benefit Fire Ins. Co.
  377 F.2d 728· 10th Cir.· 1967-05-12 ·cited 18×
  The denial of a jury trial was erroneous, but the judgment is affirmed because the contract was binding as a matter of law and the only potential prejudice regarding future remissions can be addressed by crediting appellant.
• Bernardo Penoro v. Rederi A/B Disa and Vessel Disa
  376 F.2d 125· 2d Cir.· 1967-04-03 ·cited 18×
  An order granting a stay of an admiralty proceeding pending arbitration is not an injunction appealable under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1).
• Uneeda Doll Co., Inc. v. Goldfarb Novelty Co., Inc.
  373 F.2d 851· 2d Cir.· 1967-03-09 ·cited 18×·via Preliminary Injunction
  The court held that the copyright notice on the doll and its display package was sufficient, and that willful infringers cannot claim insufficiency of notice.
• Stevens v. Frick
  372 F.2d 378· 2d Cir.· 1967-02-01 ·cited 18×·via Preliminary Injunction
  The federal anti-injunction statute, 28 U.S.C. § 2283, precludes federal courts from enjoining state court proceedings unless an exception applies, and no exception was demonstrated here.
• In re Lowell S. Fallick v. Kehr
  369 F.2d 899· 2d Cir.· 1966-12-14 ·cited 18×
  The dissenting judge believes that a bankruptcy discharge's legal effect should not be subject to the unreviewable decision of an arbitrator.
• Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. The Greyhound Corp. (Southern Greyhound Lines Division) & Floors
  368 F.2d 778· 5th Cir.· 1966-11-17 ·cited 18×
  The court held that substantial evidence on the record as a whole supports the Board's finding that Greyhound and Floors are joint employers, and that the employees constitute an appropriate unit for collective bargaining.
• Bolt Assocs., Inc. v. Alpine Geophysical Assocs., Inc.
  365 F.2d 742· 3d Cir.· 1966-09-06 ·cited 18×·via Preliminary Injunction
  The court held that while the meaning of 'design' and the similarity of the devices were not triable issues, the defense of independent development by a third party (Lamont) was a valid defense to breach of contract and required further factual determination.
• Ind. & Mich. Elec. Co. v. Fed. Power Comm'n
  365 F.2d 180· 7th Cir.· 1966-07-13 ·cited 18×
• Burritt v. Harris
  166 So. 2d 168· Fla. 1st DCA· 1964-07-02 ·cited 18×
  In this second appeal regarding zoning in Duval County, Florida, the court affirmed the trial judge's dismissal of the property owner's suit challenging the Board's refusal to rezone his residential property to industrial use. The court held that the Board's refusal was neither a
• Aaxico Airlines, Inc. v. AIR Lines Pilots Ass'n
  331 F.2d 433· 5th Cir.· 1964-04-15 ·cited 18×
  The court held that the trial court erred in exercising jurisdiction over disputes that constitute 'minor disputes' under the Railway Labor Act, which should be resolved by the System Board of Adjustment.
• Linus C. Pauling v. McNAMARA
  331 F.2d 796· D.C. Cir.· 1963-12-23 ·cited 18×
  The court held that the likelihood of future injury was insufficient to require a decision on the merits due to the Nuclear Test Ban Treaty.
• Global Aero Serv., Inc. v. Lloyd Aereo Boliviano, S.A.
  157 So. 2d 708· Fla. 3d DCA· 1963-11-19 ·cited 18×
  Global Aero Service appeals a judgment finding it breached a contract to sell and deliver airplane parts to Lloyd Aereo Boliviano by a specified date. The trial court awarded Lloyd $5,530.58 in damages and voided promissory notes, while denying Global's cross-claim for losses and
• State Rd. Dep't of Fla. v. Lewis
  156 So. 2d 862· Fla. 1st DCA· 1963-10-17 ·cited 18×
  In this inverse condemnation action, Lewis sued the State Road Department for taking his property during a 1952 highway widening and 1956 overpass construction without compensation. The court affirmed that the Department took Lewis's property but limited his recovery to special d
• Birdie Mae Davis v. Bd. OF Sch. Comm'rs OF Mobile Cnty.
  322 F.2d 356· 5th Cir.· 1963-07-09 ·cited 18×·via Injunction Pending Appeal
  The court held that the district court abused its discretion by denying a preliminary injunction for school desegregation, as the defendants offered no sufficient reason for further delay.
• Plough, Inc. v. Kreis Labs.
  314 F.2d 635· 9th Cir.· 1963-02-20 ·cited 18×
  The court held that the trial court did not err in dismissing the contempt motion, as the appellant failed to prove a likelihood of confusion between the appellee's new product names and the appellant's protected trademarks.
• Vill. OF Pembroke Pines v. Zitreen
  143 So. 2d 660· Fla. 2d DCA· 1962-08-03 ·cited 18×
  The Village of Pembroke Pines appeals a decree invalidating its zoning ordinance as applied to plaintiffs' property and directing the Village to rezone the land for commercial use. The appellate court affirms the invalidation of the restrictive zoning but reverses the mandatory r
• Meredith v. Fair
  305 F.2d 343· 5th Cir.· 1962-06-25 ·cited 18×·via Preliminary Injunction
  The dissenting judge believes the trial court's finding that the appellant would be a troublemaker should be given more weight, potentially leading to a different outcome.
• Blanchard v. Commonwealth OIL Co.
  294 F.2d 834· 5th Cir.· 1961-09-01 ·cited 18×·via Anti-Suit Injunction
  The court held that the district court should have recognized the Florida state court's anti-suit injunction on grounds of comity, and dismissed the federal action on that basis rather than reaching the merits of res judicata.
• Idlewild BON Voyage Liquor Corp. v. Rohan
  289 F.2d 426· 2d Cir.· 1961-04-14 ·cited 18×·via Interlocutory Injunction
  The court held that it has jurisdiction to hear appeals from orders entered by single district judges, even if those orders involve injunctions against state statutes, to determine if a three-judge court was required.
• Local Lodge No. 1248 OF Int'l Ass'n OF MacHinists v. ST. Regis Paper Co.
  125 So. 2d 337· Fla. 1st DCA· 1960-12-20 ·cited 18×·via Temporary Injunction
  A labor union and 85 of its members appealed from a trial court order that denied motions to dissolve a temporary injunction and to discharge a contempt finding, and adjudged all 85 members in criminal contempt for violating the injunction. The appellate court held that the conte
• Metro. Dade Cnty. v. Polk Pools, Inc.
  124 So. 2d 737· Fla. 3d DCA· 1960-12-01 ·cited 18×
  Polk Pools, Inc. sued Metropolitan Dade County seeking declaratory and injunctive relief against an alleged misinterpretation of county building ordinances requiring plumbing permits for pool construction drainage systems. The trial court granted a temporary restraining order wit
• Linus Pauling v. Eastland
  288 F.2d 126· D.C. Cir.· 1960-09-07 ·cited 18×
  The court held that a federal court lacks jurisdiction to issue a declaratory judgment or injunction against a congressional committee's inquiry before a contempt citation has been issued and a justiciable controversy has arisen.
• Fontainebleau Hotel Corp. v. Forty-Five Twenty-Five, Inc.
  114 So. 2d 357· Fla. 3d DCA· 1959-08-27 ·cited 18×
  Fontainebleau Hotel Corp. appealed a temporary injunction blocking construction of a 14-story addition to its hotel on grounds that the structure would cast shadows over the neighboring Eden Roc Hotel's beach facilities. The court reversed, holding that absent contractual, statut
• Foulk v. Fla. Real Est. Comm'n
  113 So. 2d 714· Fla. 2d DCA· 1959-07-10 ·cited 18×
  An appraiser challenged an injunction preventing him from performing a reappraisal contract for Pasco County tax purposes, arguing that tax appraisal work falls outside Florida's Real Estate License Law. The court held that appraisement of property for compensation, regardless of
• The City OF Lawton v. Chapman
  257 F.2d 601· 10th Cir.· 1958-07-28 ·cited 18×
  The court held that the plaintiff failed to prove the jurisdictional amount in controversy because the value of the right to be protected is measured by the loss from compliance, not anticipated profits, and compliance was not impossible.
• Boston Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. Ins. Agents' Int'l Union (AFL-CIO)
  258 F.2d 516· 1st Cir.· 1958-07-24 ·cited 18×
  The court held that the determination of whether a party has complied with procedural requirements for arbitration, such as acting within a reasonable time, is a preliminary question for the court, not the arbitrator.
• Comptone Co., Ltd. v. Rayex Corp.
  251 F.2d 487· 2d Cir.· 1958-01-09 ·cited 18×·via Preliminary Injunction
  The court held that the contempt finding was not appealable as it was not a final decision and no penalty had been imposed, but affirmed the preliminary injunction.
• Pearce v. Pearce
  97 So. 2d 329· Fla. 2d DCA· 1957-10-16 ·cited 18×
  A Florida appellate court affirmed a trial court's decree requiring landowners to open their dike at two specific points to allow natural water flow through established water courses on the plaintiff's land. The court held that landowners cannot construct dikes that obstruct the
• Seagram-Distillers Corp. v. NEW CUT Rate Liquors, Inc.
  245 F.2d 453· 7th Cir.· 1957-05-23 ·cited 18×·via Preliminary Injunction
  The court held that the district court erred in finding it had federal jurisdiction because the plaintiff failed to provide competent proof that the amount in controversy exceeded $3,000.
• Standard OIL Co. OF Tex. v. Lopeno GAS Co.
  240 F.2d 504· 5th Cir.· 1957-01-16 ·cited 18×
  A contract for the sale of gas, even if lacking initial mutuality, can be enforced if there has been part performance, and the contract language is clear and unambiguous regarding its scope, even if subsequent events make the bargain appear harsh.
• Hoffritz v. United States
  240 F.2d 109· 9th Cir.· 1956-12-20 ·cited 18×·via Preliminary Injunction
  The court held that the district court erred in denying a hearing where a genuine issue of fact existed regarding the legality of evidence seizure, and that the appeal was not moot.
• Brill v. Gen. Indus. Enters.
  234 F.2d 465· 3d Cir.· 1956-06-20 ·cited 18×
  The court held that an appeal from the dismissal of an injunction claim is moot once the enjoined action has been consummated, especially when no stay was sought pending appeal.
• Brown v. Rippy
  233 F.2d 796· 5th Cir.· 1956-05-25 ·cited 18×
  The court held that the district court erred in dismissing the suit as premature without a full hearing.
• Burnham v. Davis Islands
  87 So. 2d 97· Fla.· 1956-03-16 ·cited 18×
  Homeowners who purchased lots in Davis Islands subdivision challenged the developers' decision to subdivide and sell a golf course area, claiming they acquired easement rights through public dedication, estoppel, or contract. The Florida Supreme Court affirmed the lower court's r
• Greylock Broad. Co. v. United States & Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n
  231 F.2d 748· D.C. Cir.· 1956-02-14 ·cited 18×·via Interlocutory Injunction
  The court granted a stay, preventing the FCC from processing applications for VHF Channel 10 pending the outcome of a deintermixture proceeding.
• Burns v. McCRARY
  229 F.2d 286· 2d Cir.· 1956-01-11 ·cited 18×·via Preliminary Injunction
  The court held that the district court lacked jurisdiction to grant an injunction because plaintiffs had not exhausted their administrative remedies.
• Bd. of Supervisors of La. State Univ. & Agric. & Mech. Coll. v. Tureaud
  225 F.2d 434· 5th Cir.· 1955-08-23 ·cited 18×·via Interlocutory Injunction
• Holmes v. City OF Atlanta
  223 F.2d 93· 5th Cir.· 1955-06-17 ·cited 18×
  The appellate court affirmed the trial court's judgment, finding the plaintiffs' appeal specifications contradicted the relief they were granted.
• Pigott v. Detroit
  221 F.2d 736· 6th Cir.· 1955-03-04 ·cited 18×·via Suit For Injunction
  The dissenting judge believes the majority erred by upholding a decision from a biased tribunal, arguing the district court should determine if the union falls under statutory protections.
• Al Friedman v. Int'l Ass'n OF MacHinists
  220 F.2d 808· D.C. Cir.· 1955-02-17 ·cited 18×
  The court held that the plaintiff's union membership, and the potential loss of employment and benefits stemming from his expulsion, constituted a matter in controversy exceeding $3,000.00, thus establishing federal jurisdiction.
• W. L. Mead, Inc. v. Int'l Bhd. OF Teamsters
  217 F.2d 6· 1st Cir.· 1954-11-18 ·cited 18×·via Temporary Injunction
  The court held that the Norris-LaGuardia Act prohibits federal courts from issuing injunctions against peaceful strikes and picketing, even when such actions violate a collective bargaining agreement under the Labor Management Relations Act.
• Stoner v. S. Peninsula Zoning Comm'n
  75 So. 2d 831· Fla.· 1954-11-16 ·cited 18×
  The Florida Supreme Court reversed a temporary injunction preventing the creation of a municipality in South Peninsula, Volusia County. The court held that equity courts should not enjoin the exercise of political rights granted by statute absent a clear showing of irreparable in