Injunction

5,622 Florida cases classified under this topic, plus 6,142 listed through its narrower topics · sorted by citation count · see the citation graph · browse and sort

• City OF N. Miami v. Outrigger Club, Inc.
  269 So. 2d 12· Fla. 3d DCA· 1972-11-21 ·cited 2×·via Mandatory Injunction
  The court held that the forty-foot height limitation in Section 29-50 does not apply to buildings constructed under the 1-B1 zoning district regulations when incorporated into a 2-C district, and that the city must review the building plans.
• United Steelworkers OF Am., AFL-CIO v. Seminole Asphalt Ref., Inc.
  269 So. 2d 28· Fla. 1st DCA· 1972-11-21 ·cited 2×
  The United Steelworkers appeals a trial court's temporary injunction issued without notice against union picketing at Seminole Asphalt Refining's plant. The appellate court reversed, holding that the unverified petition and affidavit were legally insufficient to support an ex par
• Tornillo v. Miami Herald Publ'g Co.
  38 Fla. Supp. 80· Dade Cty. Cir. Ct.· 1972-10-20 ·cited 2×·via Mandatory Injunction
  The court held that Florida Statute §104.38 is unconstitutional on its face as it violates the First Amendment by impermissibly infringing upon freedom of the press and is also void for vagueness.
• Sebesta v. Miklas
  272 So. 2d 141· Fla.· 1972-10-18 ·cited 2×
  The Florida Supreme Court addressed the constitutionality of Chapter 72-555, which created a unified county government for Hillsborough County with a nine-member council elected from districts. The court reversed the trial court's invalidation of the act, corrected a clerical omi
• Rykus v. NEW York City Hous. Auth.
  468 F.2d 215· Temp. Emer. Ct. App.· 1972-10-12 ·cited 2×
  The court held that the City of New York's power to enforce the guaranty contract for Pomonok Houses' financing constitutes 'control' over rents for the purpose of Price Commission Regulation 301.106(b)(2), exempting the rent increase from federal control.
• Pauls v. Seamans
  468 F.2d 361· 1st Cir.· 1972-10-12 ·cited 2×·via Preliminary Injunction
  Active duty time obtained solely through an improperly issued restraining order and injunction cannot be counted towards the two-year period required for sanctuary from involuntary release under 10 U.S.C. § 1163(d).
• Automated Mktg. Sys., Inc. v. Martin
  467 F.2d 1181· 10th Cir.· 1972-10-05 ·cited 2×·via Preliminary Injunction
  The court held that the trial court did not err in denying appellant's request for a preliminary injunction.
• Holinone, Inc. v. Int'l Hole-In-One Club, Inc.
  466 F.2d 504· 5th Cir.· 1972-08-28 ·cited 2×·via Preliminary Injunction
  The court affirmed the denial of a preliminary injunction, finding no clear abuse of discretion by the district court.
• Tre-O-Ripe Groves, Inc. v. Mills
  266 So. 2d 120· Fla. 1st DCA· 1972-08-24 ·cited 2×
  The court held that when federal property is used by a private enterprise for its own gain, the property loses its tax immunity.
• Choctawhatchee Elec. Coop., Inc. v. Gulf Power Co.
  265 So. 2d 417· Fla. 1st DCA· 1972-08-15 ·cited 2×
  Gulf Power Company sought to enforce a 1955 permanent injunction against Choctawhatchee Electric Cooperative (Cheleo) preventing it from serving the Baker schoolhouse site in Okaloosa County. The trial court upheld the injunction, rejecting Cheleo's defenses of laches, waiver, an
• Sanders v. Wyman
  464 F.2d 488· 2d Cir.· 1972-07-12 ·cited 2×·via Preliminary Injunction
  The court held that the appeal should be dismissed because the case is moot, as there is no longer a threat of disclosure of confidential welfare recipient information.
• Baggett v. Boege
  264 So. 2d 97· Fla. 2d DCA· 1972-06-21 ·cited 2×
  The court held that the restrictive covenant, coupled with the appellant's election to provide water service for over five years, obligated him to continue providing water and that discontinuing service constituted a breach.
• Del. & Hudson Ry. Co. v. United Transp. Union
  461 F.2d 671· 2d Cir.· 1972-05-31 ·cited 2×·via Permanent Injunction
  The court held that the district court properly classified the dispute as 'minor' under the Railway Labor Act and affirmed the injunction, but remanded for the district court to determine equitable claims filing.
• United Automobile v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
  462 F.2d 298· D.C. Cir.· 1972-03-30 ·cited 2×·via Mandatory Injunction
  The court held that the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) did not adequately consider the challenged ballots when it set aside an election due to a business transfer, and thus the case must be remanded for the Board to resolve the ballot challenges.
• Hopson v. Asch
  457 F.2d 79· 3d Cir.· 1972-03-14 ·cited 2×
  Federal courts should not enjoin or grant declaratory relief for pending state court proceedings unless exceptional circumstances are present.
• Lehigh Portland Cement Co. v. Swope
  455 F.2d 638· 5th Cir.· 1972-02-23 ·cited 2×
  The court held that the district court properly dismissed Lehigh's complaint because the issues had already been determined adversely to Lehigh in prior proceedings.
• Blakely v. Selective Serv. Sys.
  455 F.2d 795· 5th Cir.· 1972-02-22 ·cited 2×·via Petition For Injunction
  A registrant who received a II-S undergraduate deferment after the enactment of the Military Selective Service Act of 1967 is not entitled to a III-A fatherhood or dependency classification. The district court properly denied pre-induction relief.
• Kosanke v. City OF ST. Petersburg Beach
  256 So. 2d 395· Fla. 2d DCA· 1972-01-14 ·cited 2×
  Residents challenged the City of St. Petersburg Beach's plan to develop recreational facilities on Lazarillo Park, claiming the land was dedicated as a horticultural park with restrictions for church and villa sites. The court affirmed the city's authority to develop the property
• Webster Outdoor Advertising Co. v. City OF Miami
  256 So. 2d 556· Fla. 3d DCA· 1972-01-13 ·cited 2×
  Webster Outdoor Advertising Company challenged Miami's 1965 ordinance requiring removal of nonconforming billboard signs within five years, arguing the removal requirement could not apply to signs that became nonconforming before 1965. The court upheld the ordinance, holding that
• The City OF Miami v. Silver
  257 So. 2d 563· Fla. 3d DCA· 1972-01-11 ·cited 2×
  The City of Miami appeals a trial court judgment invalidating R-1 single-family residential zoning on the Silvers' bayfront property, finding it unreasonable, arbitrary, and confiscatory. The appellate court affirmed, holding that the zoning restriction bore no rational relations
• State Bd. of Funeral Directors & Embalmers of Fla. v. Evans
  256 So. 2d 574· Fla. 1st DCA· 1972-01-11 ·cited 2×·via Suit For Injunction
  The Florida District Court of Appeal reversed a trial court's denial of a temporary injunction sought by the State Board of Funeral Directors and Embalmers to stop George Evans from unlawfully practicing funeral directing and embalming without a license. The court held that the a
• Torvik v. Decorah Cmty. Schs. & Wayne W. Burns
  453 F.2d 779· 8th Cir.· 1972-01-05 ·cited 2×
  The dissenting judge would reverse the lower court's injunction, finding no substantial federal question and that the school's hair length rule was a valid exercise of administrative authority.
• Hall v. Issaquena Cnty. Bd. OF Supervisors
  453 F.2d 404· 5th Cir.· 1971-12-29 ·cited 2×·via Injunction Pending Appeal
  The court held that the parties' suggested course of action to remand the case to the District Court for disposition in accordance with a prior order is desirable.
• Grimes v. Commonwealth OF Ky.
  451 F.2d 1353· 6th Cir.· 1971-11-30 ·cited 2×·via Injunction Pending Appeal
  The court denied the motion for an injunction pending appeal.
• Riback Enters., Inc. v. Denham
  452 F.2d 845· 2d Cir.· 1971-11-26 ·cited 2×·via Preliminary Injunction
  A preliminary injunction prohibiting the sale of greeting card booklets solely because they imitated the format of the plaintiff's unpatented product was overly broad and improper under federal patent law principles.
• John E. Withers Transfer & Storage Co. v. Overstreet
  254 So. 2d 855· Fla. 3d DCA· 1971-11-16 ·cited 2×
  Warehousing companies operating under Florida Public Service Commission certificates challenged Dade County and municipal occupational license taxes as invalid. The court affirmed the trial court's ruling that such taxes could be imposed and rejected plaintiffs' attempt to pursue
• Sears v. Solien
  450 F.2d 353· 8th Cir.· 1971-11-03 ·cited 2×·via Temporary Injunction
  The court held that the district court lacked subject matter jurisdiction because the appellants had not exhausted their administrative remedies and the Board is the proper forum to interpret its own rules.
• In re Gulf Aerospace Corp. v. Platter
  449 F.2d 733· 5th Cir.· 1971-11-02 ·cited 2×·via Temporary Injunction
  The court held that the case should be remanded for final disposition due to changed circumstances and the government's broad interpretation of the injunction.
• Peoples GAS Sys., Inc. v. Lynch
  254 So. 2d 371· Fla. 3d DCA· 1971-10-05 ·cited 2×
  Peoples Gas System challenged a trial court's summary judgment holding that the utility had no authority to collect a municipal franchise fee from customers. The court reversed, holding that a public utility may lawfully pass municipal franchise fees to affected customers as an a
• Musick v. Jonsson
  449 F.2d 201· 5th Cir.· 1971-09-27 ·cited 2×·via Request For Injunction
  The court held that the plaintiffs failed to demonstrate the irreparable injury required for federal injunctive relief against the ordinance.
• James Austin Imus for himself v. United States Gov't
  447 F.2d 1008· 10th Cir.· 1971-09-08 ·cited 2×·via Preliminary Injunction
  The court held that the trial court lacked authority to grant relief regarding individual classification issues or the general objection to the ministerial exemption due to statutory prohibitions on review.
• Miller v. Kusper
  445 F.2d 1059· 7th Cir.· 1971-07-15 ·cited 2×·via Mandatory Injunction
  The court held that the plaintiffs failed to state a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 because the city officials' refusal to provide computerized voter data did not constitute a misuse of power or an abridgment of constitutional rights.
• United States v. Harrison Cnty.
  445 F.2d 276· 5th Cir.· 1971-06-24 ·cited 2×·via Injunctive Decree
  The District Court erred by dismissing the Bolton claim without hearing evidence on whether the beach was submerged or artificially constructed.
• Northcross v. Bd. OF Educ. OF the Memphis City Schs.
  444 F.2d 1184· 6th Cir.· 1971-06-07 ·cited 2×
  The court held that the district judge did not abuse his discretion in denying an injunction to halt the construction of new schools, applying Supreme Court desegregation guidelines.
• Tasby v. Nolan Estes
  444 F.2d 124· 5th Cir.· 1971-06-03 ·cited 2×·via Preliminary Injunction
  The court held that the district court erred in denying the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction and remanded the case for expeditious findings of fact and conclusions of law.
• Carpenters Dist. Council OF Jacksonville & Vicinity v. The Honorable Roger J. Waybright
  248 So. 2d 179· Fla. 1st DCA· 1971-05-10 ·cited 2×·via Suit For Injunction
  Labor unions sought a writ of prohibition to bar a circuit judge from enjoining a strike they claimed was protected activity under federal labor law. The court held that state courts have concurrent jurisdiction to enforce no-strike provisions in collective bargaining agreements,
• Atlanta Fed. & City Serv. Emps. Local Union 554, Serv. Emps. Int'l Union, AFL-CIO v. Serv. Emps. Int'l Union, AFL-CIO
  441 F.2d 1115· 5th Cir.· 1971-05-10 ·cited 2×·via Preliminary Injunction
  The court held that the dissolution of the trusteeship and subsequent election did not moot the appeal, and affirmed the denial of the preliminary injunction.
• Robinson v. Am. Broad. Cos., Inc.
  441 F.2d 1396· 6th Cir.· 1971-04-30 ·cited 2×·via Suit For Injunction
  The court held that an injunction prohibiting the broadcast of anti-smoke commercials would constitute an impermissible prior restraint under the First Amendment.
• Ewing v. Camacho
  441 F.2d 1142· 9th Cir.· 1971-04-26 ·cited 2×·via Mandatory Injunction
  The court held that the district court's findings and legal conclusions were supported by substantial proof and were fully warranted, affirming the judgment against the plaintiff.
• City OF Daytona Beach v. Stansfield
  247 So. 2d 753· Fla. 1st DCA· 1971-04-20 ·cited 2×
• Munitions Carriers Conf., Inc. v. Am. Farm Lines
  440 F.2d 944· 10th Cir.· 1971-03-30 ·cited 2×·via Permanent Injunction
  The court held that the appellants willfully violated the permanent injunction by engaging in specific types of freight transportation, and the damages award was not inequitable despite subsequent legal developments.
• Rko-Stanley Warner Theatres, Inc. v. Mellon Nat'l Bank & Tr. Co.
  436 F.2d 1297· 3d Cir.· 1970-12-29 ·cited 2×
  An easement by prescription can be acquired in a public sidewalk against the abutting fee owner, provided the use falls outside the scope of the public easement. However, prescriptive rights cannot be acquired against a municipality.
• United States v. Wefers
  435 F.2d 826· 1st Cir.· 1970-12-10 ·cited 2×
  The court held that the defendant could not be convicted of criminal contempt because the court order was not sufficiently clear and unambiguous to establish wilful violation.
• Audrea Jones v. Dist. of Columbia Armory Bd.
  438 F.2d 138· D.C. Cir.· 1970-11-02 ·cited 2×·via Request For Injunction
  The court held that the Armory Board's refusal to rent the Armory to appellants was a reasonable exercise of its discretion and did not violate constitutional rights.
• Gulf Coast Refractory Servs., Inc. v. Green
  240 So. 2d 501· Fla. 2d DCA· 1970-10-28 ·cited 2×
  A non-compete agreement lacking express territorial limitation is not void on its face and may be enforceable to the extent it restricts solicitation of customers and use of trade secrets, with the trial court having authority to reduce restrictions to reasonable scope.
• Lance v. Thompson
  432 F.2d 767· 5th Cir.· 1970-10-21 ·cited 2×·via Preliminary Injunction
  The court held that the district court did not err in denying the student's motion for a preliminary injunction.
• Teamsters Local Union No. 769 v. Fontainbleau Hotel Corp.
  239 So. 2d 255· Fla.· 1970-09-16 ·cited 2×·via Temporary Injunction
  The Florida Supreme Court vacated a temporary injunction prohibiting a union from picketing a hotel, finding that federal labor law preempts state authority to enjoin peaceful picketing in labor disputes. The Court held that the Circuit Court lacked sufficient factual basis to ex
• CY Ellis RAW BAR v. Dist. OF Columbia Redev. Land Agency
  433 F.2d 543· D.C. Cir.· 1970-08-27 ·cited 2×·via Permanent Injunction
  The court held that the RLA's interpretation and procedure violated the statute, and the plaintiff was entitled to injunctive relief to protect her statutory priority rights.
• Salcedo v. Lt. Col. Richard F. Lauer
  430 F.2d 1282· 9th Cir.· 1970-08-06 ·cited 2×
  The court held that the district court correctly dismissed the action for lack of jurisdiction, as the appellant had not exhausted administrative remedies and the claims did not invoke mandamus jurisdiction.
• James Bakalis & Nickie Bakalis, Inc. v. Simonson
  434 F.2d 515· D.C. Cir.· 1970-08-04 ·cited 2×·via Preliminary Injunction
  The court held that the two suspension cases should have been treated as one, entitling the appellant to an appeal for a total suspension exceeding 30 days.