Injunctive Decree

16 Florida cases classified under this topic · sorted by citation count · browse and sort

• Jackson Grain Co. v. LEE
  150 Fla. 232· Fla.· 1942-03-27 ·cited 38×
  Jackson Grain Company and other chain stores appealed the lower court's order striking parts of their answer and dismissing their counterclaim in a tax dispute with Florida's Comptroller. The Florida Supreme Court affirmed, holding that the Comptroller's previous inability to col
• Interdynamics, Inc. v. Firma Wolf
  698 F.2d 157· 3d Cir.· 1982-12-30 ·cited 32×
  The dissenting judge would remand for an order determining that the defendant's new product (D3) does not violate the injunctive provisions of the consent decree.
• Guess v. Azar
  57 So. 2d 443· Fla.· 1952-03-11 ·cited 21×
  The Florida Supreme Court affirmed a lower court's decision regarding a property owner's right of way. The court clarified that while a limited right of ingress and egress existed for home, agricultural, and stock-raising purposes, it did not extend to commercial hauling of shell
• Johnson v. McKASKLE
  727 F.2d 498· 5th Cir.· 1984-03-23 ·cited 18×
  The district court erred in dismissing a prisoner's § 1983 action with prejudice based on res judicata, as claims arising after the Ruiz v. Estelle judgment could not have been litigated in that class action.
• Mapp v. The Bd. OF Educ. OF the City OF Chattanooga
  477 F.2d 851· 6th Cir.· 1973-04-30 ·cited 16×
  The court affirmed the District Court's judgments in the school desegregation case.
• Alton Belote & Pine Air Farms, Inc. v. Slye
  206 So. 2d 276· Fla. 1st DCA· 1968-01-25 ·cited 13×
  The court held that the injunctive decree was sufficiently specific and the evidence supported the finding of contempt, thus the judgment should be affirmed.
• World Airways, Inc. v. Ne. Airlines, Inc.
  349 F.2d 1007· 1st Cir.· 1965-08-30 ·cited 12×
  The court held that a sales agency agreement between an air carrier and a travel agency violated the carrier's certificate of authority by engaging in prohibited charter trip arrangements, and that the district court had jurisdiction to enjoin such violations.
• Green v. Wisner
  119 So. 2d 814· Fla. 2d DCA· 1960-04-22 ·cited 10×
  This case involves a tax classification dispute regarding $491,619.19 in uninvested funds held by brokers for the Wisner taxpayers. The court held that these liquid, unencumbered funds constitute Class A intangible personal property subject to the lower tax rate, rather than Clas
• Commonwealth OF Pa. & Raymond Williams v. Local Union 542
  807 F.2d 330· 3d Cir.· 1986-12-05 ·cited 8×
  A race-conscious remedy must be narrowly tailored to the violations it seeks to correct and must respect the legitimate interests of all affected individuals.
• N. Hess' Sons, Inc. v. Hess Apparel, Inc.
  738 F.2d 1412· 4th Cir.· 1984-07-10 ·cited 8×
  The court held that the district court did not abuse its remedial discretion by issuing an injunctive decree that, while mild, was not demonstrably ineffectual on the record presented.
• Interstate Commerce Comm'n v. Holmes Transp., Inc.
  931 F.2d 984· 1st Cir.· 1991-05-06 ·cited 4×
  The court held that the district court must first determine whether the automatic stay under the Bankruptcy Code applied to the ICC action and contempt proceedings, as this issue was not addressed below and could render the district court's orders void.
• Kittridge Troxler v. ST. John THE Baptist Parish Police Jury
  469 F.2d 647· 5th Cir.· 1972-11-30 ·cited 2×
  The court held that the district court did not err in clarifying its prior injunctive order regarding candidate residency, even if it affected the outcome of a state election.
• John E. Withers Transfer & Storage Co. v. Overstreet
  254 So. 2d 855· Fla. 3d DCA· 1971-11-16 ·cited 2×
  Warehousing companies operating under Florida Public Service Commission certificates challenged Dade County and municipal occupational license taxes as invalid. The court affirmed the trial court's ruling that such taxes could be imposed and rejected plaintiffs' attempt to pursue
• United States v. Harrison Cnty.
  445 F.2d 276· 5th Cir.· 1971-06-24 ·cited 2×
  The District Court erred by dismissing the Bolton claim without hearing evidence on whether the beach was submerged or artificially constructed.
• Laborers' Int'l Union OF N. Am. v. Myrtice Burroughs
  522 So. 2d 852· Fla. 3d DCA· 1987-12-15 ·cited 1×
  The Florida District Court of Appeal quashed a local administrative board's order requiring a union local with fewer than 15 employees to pay damages and attorney's fees for sexual harassment, finding the board exceeded its quasi-judicial authority by awarding equitable remedies
• Shultz v. Kelley
  431 F.2d 1364· 10th Cir.· 1970-09-30
  An employee who regularly performs duties that directly affect the safety of motor vehicle operations in interstate commerce is exempt from overtime provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act, regardless of the proportion of time spent on such duties.