Injunction

5,622 Florida cases classified under this topic, plus 6,142 listed through its narrower topics · sorted by citation count · see the citation graph · browse and sort

• Murphy OIL Corp. v. Hickel
  439 F.2d 417· 8th Cir.· 1971-03-08 ·cited 4×·via Mandatory Injunction
  The dissenting judge would affirm the district court's decision, finding the regulation's literal language inapplicable to Murphy Oil.
• Atlanta & W. Point R.R. Co. & W. Ry. of Ala. v. United Transp. Union
  439 F.2d 73· 5th Cir.· 1971-02-19 ·cited 4×·via Preliminary Injunction
  The court held that the district court had jurisdiction to issue a preliminary injunction against a union strike when the parties had not exhausted the procedures of the Railway Labor Act, despite the Norris-LaGuardia Act's limitations on injunctions.
• Hodgson v. Morris
  437 F.2d 896· 5th Cir.· 1971-01-28 ·cited 4×
• Morris v. Affleck
  437 F.2d 82· 1st Cir.· 1971-01-06 ·cited 4×·via Preliminary Injunction
  The appeal is dismissed as moot because the district court dissolved the preliminary injunction, rendering the issue moot.
• City OF Miami Beach v. State of Fla. ex rel. Richard E. Gerstein
  242 So. 2d 170· Fla. 3d DCA· 1970-12-22 ·cited 4×
  The City of Miami Beach challenged an interlocutory order regarding enforcement of a 1953 declaratory injunction prohibiting construction on the ocean foreshore. The appellate court affirmed the trial court's authority to treat the State Attorney's petition as a motion for supple
• Weintraub v. Hanrahan
  435 F.2d 461· 7th Cir.· 1970-12-07 ·cited 4×·via Interlocutory Injunction
  A single judge cannot grant an interlocutory injunction in a case requiring a three-judge court, even if the injunction is granted before the three-judge court is convened.
• ICE Cream Drivers & Emps. Union Local 757 v. Borden, Inc.
  433 F.2d 41· 2d Cir.· 1970-10-26 ·cited 4×·via Boys Markets Injunction
  The court held that the majority's decision improperly expanded the scope of arbitration beyond what the parties agreed to, potentially allowing for delay and judicial interference in arbitral matters.
• Malone v. United Steel Workers OF Am., AFL-CIO
  432 F.2d 554· 4th Cir.· 1970-10-13 ·cited 4×
  The court held that the district court did not err in finding reasonable cause to believe an unfair labor practice occurred and in issuing an injunction.
• United States v. Cent. Carolina Bank & Tr. Co.
  431 F.2d 972· 4th Cir.· 1970-10-02 ·cited 4×·via Preliminary Injunction
  The court held that the district court erred in denying a preliminary injunction to require desegregation of the golf facility.
• Int'l Union v. Dist. 50
  435 F.2d 421· D.C. Cir.· 1970-08-17 ·cited 4×
  The court held that the $8,000,000 promissory note and affiliation agreement were unenforceable due to the UMW's fiduciary breach and the coercive circumstances of their execution, particularly in light of the Landrum-Griffin Act.
• Harry H. Price & Sons, Inc. v. Hardin
  425 F.2d 1137· 5th Cir.· 1970-04-27 ·cited 4×·via Claim For Injunction
  The court held that the appellant has standing to challenge the administrative regulations and that the district court's dismissal for failure to state a claim was premature.
• City OF Miami Beach v. Hendrik J. Berns
  231 So. 2d 847· Fla. 3d DCA· 1970-02-24 ·cited 4×
  The City of Miami Beach and its council members challenged an injunction requiring all city council meetings to be held in public under Florida's 1967 Government in the Sunshine Law. The appellate court affirmed the injunction, holding that the Sunshine Law applies to municipal g
• Abex Corp. v. Fed. Trade Comm'n
  420 F.2d 928· 6th Cir.· 1970-01-08 ·cited 4×
  The court held that there was substantial evidence to support the FTC's finding of a valid submarket for sintered metal friction materials and that the acquisition substantially lessened competition. The court also affirmed the FTC's authority to issue a cease and desist order, m
• Telerama, Inc. v. United States & Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n
  419 F.2d 1047· 6th Cir.· 1969-12-23 ·cited 4×·via Request For Injunction
  The court held that the FCC's interpretation of 'new geographical area' was reasonable and that Telerama's equitable claims were not sufficient to overcome the regulatory scheme.
• Karpinski v. Resor
  419 F.2d 531· 3d Cir.· 1969-12-23 ·cited 4×·via Preliminary Injunction
  The court affirmed the denial of a preliminary injunction, holding that the appellant must exhaust administrative remedies by reporting for duty and undergoing a physical examination. The court also held that the statutory authority to extend active duty beyond enlistment for nat
• Vasilj v. Local Bd. NO. 134
  422 F.2d 861· 9th Cir.· 1969-12-22 ·cited 4×·via Suit For Injunction
  The court held that the district court correctly found it lacked jurisdiction to review the registrant's classification, as the statute prohibits judicial review except in defense to a criminal prosecution.
• In re Tel-A-Sign, Inc.
  415 F.2d 1334· 7th Cir.· 1969-08-15 ·cited 4×
  The bankruptcy court has the power to enjoin the prosecution of a claim asserted to be non-dischargeable if unusual circumstances make the bankrupt's remedy in another court inadequate and the claim lacks merit.
• McFADDEN v. Selective Serv. Sys.
  415 F.2d 1140· 9th Cir.· 1969-08-08 ·cited 4×
  The court held that allowing a civil action for declaratory judgment to proceed parallel to an imminent criminal trial is an improper exercise of discretion. The dismissal of the civil action as to the defendant facing criminal charges was affirmed.
• United States v. Harrison Cnty.
  414 F.2d 784· 5th Cir.· 1969-08-07 ·cited 4×·via Mandatory Injunction
  The court held that Harrison County's contract dedicating the beach to public use must be enforced, and landowners are prohibited from interfering with this use, despite claims of acquisition by artificial accretion.
• 601 W. 26 Corp. v. Solitron Devices, Inc.
  420 F.2d 293· 2d Cir.· 1969-06-26 ·cited 4×·via Preliminary Injunction
  The court held that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying a preliminary injunction.
• Elgin Coal Co. v. Louisville & Nashville R.R. Co.
  411 F.2d 1043· 6th Cir.· 1969-06-13 ·cited 4×
  The court held that the Interstate Commerce Commission, not the district court, must initially determine whether a railroad's reduced service, due to employee refusal to cross a protest line, constitutes reasonable service under the statute.
• Sanford Indus., Inc. v. Mohammad S. Jaghory & United Trussed Roofs Co., Inc.
  223 So. 2d 77· Fla. 3d DCA· 1969-05-27 ·cited 4×·via Preliminary Injunction
  The court held that the trial court's denial of a preliminary injunction was proper because the non-competition agreement was unreasonable as to area.
• Terry v. Colonial Stores Emp's. Credit Union of Atlanta
  411 F.2d 553· 5th Cir.· 1969-05-16 ·cited 4×
  A Chapter XIII wage earner plan cannot be confirmed if it materially and adversely affects a secured creditor's interest without their consent.
• City OF ST. Paul v. Chicago
  413 F.2d 762· 8th Cir.· 1969-05-06 ·cited 4×
  A zoning ordinance restricting building heights is a valid exercise of police power if reasonably related to public welfare, even if it depreciates property values or serves aesthetic purposes.
• Prudence Mut. Cas. Co. v. Humphreys
  220 So. 2d 381· Fla. 3d DCA· 1969-02-25 ·cited 4×
  The Third District Court of Appeal of Florida affirmed the dismissal of an insurance company's amended complaint seeking an injunction against arbitration. The court held that the company could not indirectly seek a determination of liability, which depended on factual issues, th
• Johns v. Redeker
  406 F.2d 878· 8th Cir.· 1969-02-14 ·cited 4×
  A single judge may dismiss a complaint for lack of federal jurisdiction if no substantial federal question is presented, even if a three-judge court was requested. Higher tuition for nonresidents is permissible.
• Gary v. Dane
  411 F.2d 711· D.C. Cir.· 1969-02-12 ·cited 4×
  A party can establish title by adverse possession even if their claim is based on ignorance or mistake, provided the possession is actual, exclusive, continuous, open, and notorious for the statutory period.
• Frank and Lucille Ristuccia v. Earl and Bernice Adams
  406 F.2d 1257· 9th Cir.· 1969-02-12 ·cited 4×
  The court held that a removal petition is improper when there is no pending state court action, and a district court cannot remand a non-existent cause of action.
• State OF Ga. v. City OF Chattanooga
  406 F.2d 830· 6th Cir.· 1969-02-06 ·cited 4×·via Ex Parte Injunction
  The court held that the district court erred in dismissing Georgia's complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, as the seizure of property moving in interstate commerce raised substantial federal questions.
• Kalec v. Adamowski
  406 F.2d 536· 7th Cir.· 1969-01-10 ·cited 4×
  The court held that the district court erred in dismissing the complaint as a substitute for habeas corpus, but affirmed the dismissal because the complaint failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted.
• Vincent v. Small Bus. Admin.
  402 F.2d 769· 4th Cir.· 1968-10-31 ·cited 4×
  The District Court correctly dissolved the injunction and had jurisdiction to hear the removed case.
• Sheetmetal Workers' Int'l Ass'n v. Fla. Heat & Power, Inc.
  214 So. 2d 783· Fla. 4th DCA· 1968-10-08 ·cited 4×
  A union picketed a construction contractor despite knowing the contractor employed no sheet metal workers and had no labor dispute with the union. The court affirmed that state jurisdiction was not preempted by the National Labor Relations Act because no labor dispute existed, al
• Cole v. S. Bell Tel. & Tel. Co.
  31 Fla. Supp. 100· Dade Cty. Cir. Ct.· 1968-09-03 ·cited 4×
  Customers of Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. sued to enjoin the Florida Public Service Commission from holding a hearing on the company's petition to recover federal income tax surcharges through rate increases, alleging the company had already collected excess funds from
• Coral v. Funderberg
  396 F.2d 638· 9th Cir.· 1968-06-11 ·cited 4×·via Mandatory Injunction
  The court held that the Secretary of the Interior was not required to grant a leasehold interest to an occupant of an unpatented mining claim who did not meet the statutory definition of a "qualified applicant" as a principal place of residence.
• Onesephor Broussard v. The Houston Indep. Sch. Dist.
  395 F.2d 817· 5th Cir.· 1968-05-30 ·cited 4×·via Suit For Injunction
  The court held that the school district's construction program, even if resulting in de facto segregation, did not violate constitutional rights when based on legitimate factors like student need and convenience, and when administered under a valid freedom of choice plan.
• Barnhardt v. Meridian Mun. Separate Sch. Dist.
  394 F.2d 454· 5th Cir.· 1968-04-24 ·cited 4×
  The court held that adding 'or any other person' to the desegregation decree was a substantial policy change impermissible under prior precedent.
• Fla. Real Est. Comm'n v. Reliable Rental Agency, Inc.
  209 So. 2d 675· Fla. 3d DCA· 1968-04-09 ·cited 4×
  The Florida Real Estate Commission appealed a trial court's dismissal of its action to enjoin Reliable Rental Agency and its president from operating as unlicensed real estate brokers. The court held that Reliable's activities in negotiating and executing apartment leases for mul
• Beryl N. Jones v. Caddo Parish Sch. Bd.
  392 F.2d 721· 5th Cir.· 1968-03-27 ·cited 4×·via Injunction Pending Appeal
  The court held that summary reversal was not appropriate, but ordered that appellants be given an opportunity to test faculty desegregation compliance before the next school year.
• Paul v. Daytona Beach Racing & Recreational Facilities Dist.
  208 So. 2d 653· Fla. 1st DCA· 1968-03-26 ·cited 4×
  Tax officials challenged a trial court decree exempting property leased by the Daytona Beach Racing and Recreational Facilities District from ad valorem taxation. The Florida Supreme Court had previously upheld the constitutional validity of the tax exemption under a special legi
• Axelrod v. Stoltz
  391 F.2d 549· 3d Cir.· 1968-03-12 ·cited 4×·via Preliminary Injunction
  The court held that the district court had jurisdiction under Section 102 of the LMRDA and properly granted a preliminary injunction.
• Mills v. Dade Cnty.
  206 So. 2d 227· Fla. 3d DCA· 1968-01-30 ·cited 4×
  Appellants challenged a Dade County Zoning Resolution as an unconstitutional delegation of legislative power and sought declaratory and injunctive relief. The lower court entered summary judgment for the county based on equitable estoppel, but the appellate court reversed because
• Ross v. City OF Miami
  205 So. 2d 545· Fla. 3d DCA· 1968-01-03 ·cited 4×
  The court held that the trial court did not err in dismissing the suit seeking an injunction and variance, nor in vacating a decree pro confesso, as the zoning ordinance was a proper exercise of police power and the plaintiff failed to demonstrate arbitrary or confiscatory applic
• ELY Valley Mines, Inc. v. LEE
  385 F.2d 188· 9th Cir.· 1967-11-08 ·cited 4×
  The court held that the striking of counterclaims was proper, a restraining order against Janney was improper and must be reversed, and motions to amend judgment and re-tax costs were correctly denied as untimely.
• Ryals v. Rich
  202 So. 2d 779· Fla. 4th DCA· 1967-09-29 ·cited 4×
  The court held that the special act unconstitutionally usurped judicial power by mandating injunctions without regard to traditional equitable considerations or judicial discretion.
• W. Pac. R.R. Co. & The S. Pac. Co. v. Habermeyer
  382 F.2d 1003· 9th Cir.· 1967-08-23 ·cited 4×
  The court held that the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act, specifically section 355(g), precludes employers from seeking judicial review of the Railroad Retirement Board's decisions to grant benefits to employees.
• Insured Lloyds v. Bertram M. James
  200 So. 2d 595· Fla. 1st DCA· 1967-06-08 ·cited 4×
  An insurance company appealed an order denying injunctive relief to enforce an alleged settlement agreement with a policyholder. The appellate court dismissed the interlocutory appeal because the appellant failed to include a transcript of testimony or stipulated facts in the rec
• Aeronautical Radio, Inc. v. Nat'l Mediation Bd.
  380 F.2d 624· D.C. Cir.· 1967-06-02 ·cited 4×·via Mandatory Injunction
  The court held that the National Mediation Board's certification of a union representative was permissible despite a plurality of votes, and the district court erred in denying a mandatory injunction to compel bargaining.
• Gilmore v. The Greene Cnty. Democratic Party Executive Comm.
  370 F.2d 919· 5th Cir.· 1966-12-23 ·cited 4×
  The court denied a motion to recall its mandate and for injunctive relief, finding it inappropriate to intervene in a pending state court appeal.
• N. OIL Co., Inc. v. Socony Mobil OIL Co., Inc.
  368 F.2d 384· 2d Cir.· 1966-11-10 ·cited 4×·via Temporary Injunction
  The court affirmed the judgment, holding that the trial court did not err in its evidentiary rulings, particularly regarding collateral estoppel and the exclusion of the contempt proceeding record.
• Atlas Supply Co. v. Atlas Brake Shops, Inc.
  360 F.2d 16· 6th Cir.· 1966-05-10 ·cited 4×
  The court held that while the appellant's use of the 'Atlas' trademark infringed on the appellee's registered mark, the injunction prohibiting all use of the name was overly broad and should be limited.