Claim For Injunction

10 Florida cases classified under this topic · sorted by citation count · browse and sort

• Cruz v. Skelton
  502 F.2d 1101· 5th Cir.· 1974-10-14 ·cited 44×
  Members of the Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles are immune from suits for damages under the Civil Rights Act for their parole decisions.
• Scott v. Lacy
  811 F.2d 1153· 7th Cir.· 1987-02-17 ·cited 42×
  A pending request for an injunction does not defeat jurisdiction of interlocutory appeals based on claims of immunity.
• Gonzalez v. Santiago
  550 F.2d 687· 1st Cir.· 1977-03-02 ·cited 40×
  The court held that a civil rights claim for political dismissal is governed by the statute of limitations for torts, not contracts, and the prior administrative appeal did not toll the limitations period.
• Pomerantz v. Cnty. OF LOS Angeles
  674 F.2d 1288· 9th Cir.· 1982-04-19 ·cited 16×
  The court held that quasi-judicial immunity bars damages claims and that most injunctive claims were moot, but reversed the denial of an injunction for immediate jury list placement, remanding for consideration of the constitutional claim.
• People OF THE United States v. Bibb
  255 F.2d 772· 7th Cir.· 1958-06-03 ·cited 12×
  The court held that the dismissal of the complaint without dismissing the action was not a final order, and therefore the court lacked jurisdiction to hear the appeal.
• Marine Cooks & Stewards v. Panama S.S. Co., Ltd.
  265 F.2d 780· 9th Cir.· 1959-04-06 ·cited 8×
  The court held that the exception to federal question jurisdiction for maritime claims does not apply when the relief sought, like an injunction against a maritime tort, is unknown to admiralty courts.
• Adams v. State OF Ind.
  795 F.2d 27· 7th Cir.· 1986-07-03 ·cited 6×
  The court held that the bankruptcy automatic stay already enjoins tax collection, rendering the injunction request moot, and that damages claims are unripe pending resolution of tax liability in bankruptcy proceedings.
• Est. OF Clark M. Young & Martha E. Carter Young v. Williams
  810 F.2d 363· 2d Cir.· 1987-01-29 ·cited 4×
  The court held that the estate's damage claim was barred by res judicata because it arose from the same facts as a prior injunction action.
• Harry H. Price & Sons, Inc. v. Hardin
  425 F.2d 1137· 5th Cir.· 1970-04-27 ·cited 4×
  The court held that the appellant has standing to challenge the administrative regulations and that the district court's dismissal for failure to state a claim was premature.
• Sloppy v. Centurion of Fla. LLC
  N.D. Fla.· 2020-03-03
  The court held that the amended complaint adequately states a claim for an injunction against Centurion of Florida, LLC and an unknown nurse practitioner, but not against the named individual defendants.