Injunction

5,622 Florida cases classified under this topic, plus 6,126 listed through its narrower topics · sorted by citation count · see the citation graph · browse and sort

• P.S. Farrington v. CASA Solana Condo. Ass'n, Inc.
  517 So. 2d 70· Fla. 3d DCA· 1987-12-15 ·cited 6×
  Condominium unit owners appealed a trial court judgment upholding the Casa Solana Condominium Association's authority to levy a special assessment for building repairs without a unit owner vote. The court affirmed, holding that the Association's Board properly exercised its busin
• Francine Marxe v. C.W. Jackson
  833 F.2d 1121· 3d Cir.· 1987-11-24 ·cited 6×·via Preliminary Injunction
  The court held that while a plaintiff's likelihood of success on the merits was supported by the record, the district court erred in finding irreparable harm to the plaintiff without sufficient affirmative evidence, thus reversing the preliminary injunction.
• Manning v. Energy Conversion Devices, Inc.
  833 F.2d 1096· 2d Cir.· 1987-11-20 ·cited 6×·via Interlocutory Injunction
  The court affirmed the district court's order compelling arbitration, finding that the appellants failed to present an adequate basis to oppose or vacate the order despite procedural irregularities.
• UST, Inc. v. The United States
  831 F.2d 1028· Fed. Cir.· 1987-10-15 ·cited 6×·via Preliminary Injunction
  The court affirmed the denial of a preliminary injunction, holding that the appellants failed to demonstrate irreparable injury from being required to answer questionnaires.
• Stiller v. Mariner CAY Prop. Owners Ass'n, Inc.
  513 So. 2d 798· Fla. 4th DCA· 1987-10-14 ·cited 6×
• Busboom Grain Co., Inc. v. Interstate Commerce Comm'n
  830 F.2d 74· 7th Cir.· 1987-09-02 ·cited 6×·via Preliminary Injunction
  A stay pending judicial review of an ICC abandonment order is not essential to preserve shippers' ability to seek relief, as a favorable court decision can restore the status quo.
• Theis v. Smith
  827 F.2d 260· 7th Cir.· 1987-08-27 ·cited 6×
  The court held that it lacked jurisdiction to hear the appeal because the order dismissing the judge was not a final order and did not meet the criteria for a collateral order appeal.
• Vargas-Figueroa v. Saldana
  826 F.2d 160· 1st Cir.· 1987-08-18 ·cited 6×·via Preliminary Injunction
  The court held that the district court erred in granting a preliminary injunction because the plaintiff failed to demonstrate a sufficient likelihood of success on the merits and the harm to the university outweighed the harm to the plaintiff.
• Shiny Rock Mining Corp. v. United States
  825 F.2d 216· 9th Cir.· 1987-08-17 ·cited 6×
  The court held that while the notation rule was properly applied to void the mining claim, the district court erred by not addressing the underlying validity of the Public Land Order that created the withdrawal.
• Merrell v. Bonita Springs Golf Course, Ltd.
  512 So. 2d 974· Fla. 2d DCA· 1987-07-31 ·cited 6×
  Two directors of a dissolved corporation seek review of an injunction preventing them from collecting a judgment in a related case. The appellate court reversed, holding that the trial court lacked authority to issue the injunction without proper pleadings, notice, or an underlyi
• James v. United States Dep't of Health & Human Servs.
  824 F.2d 1132· D.C. Cir.· 1987-07-24 ·cited 6×
  The court held that the claims against the Department of Health and Human Services were moot due to the expiration of grants and contracts, and that the claims against the Department of the Interior required exhaustion of administrative remedies. The court affirmed the district c
• Chemlawn Servs. Corp. & CL Licensing Corp. v. GNC Pumps, Inc.
  823 F.2d 515· Fed. Cir.· 1987-07-02 ·cited 6×·via Preliminary Injunction
  The court reversed the preliminary injunction because the district court failed to timely issue findings of fact and conclusions of law and attempted to do so after losing jurisdiction.
• AMR Servs. Corp. (AMR) v. Int'l Bhd. OF Teamsters ("IBT")
  821 F.2d 162· 2d Cir.· 1987-06-19 ·cited 6×·via Preliminary Injunction
  The court held that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying a preliminary injunction because the evidence supported the finding that the picketing was not a dispute over representation under the Railway Labor Act.
• Recon/Optical, Inc. v. Gov't OF Israel
  816 F.2d 854· 2d Cir.· 1987-04-17 ·cited 6×·via Preliminary Injunction
  The court affirmed the denial of a preliminary injunction, holding that the appellant had no chance of success on the merits in enjoining a letter of credit drawdown.
• Certified Grocers OF Ill., Inc. v. Produce
  816 F.2d 329· 7th Cir.· 1987-04-10 ·cited 6×·via Boys Markets Injunction
  The appeal from the preliminary injunction is dismissed as moot because the injunction expired by its own terms and the subsequent permanent injunction was not timely appealed.
• Hansen v. Guyette
  814 F.2d 547· 8th Cir.· 1987-03-25 ·cited 6×·via Preliminary Injunction
  The court held that a union's trusteeship imposed for correcting a local union's violation of the international constitution and federal labor laws was validly imposed and enforceable by injunction.
• Kareem Faheem-El v. Klincar
  814 F.2d 461· 7th Cir.· 1987-03-18 ·cited 6×·via Preliminary Injunction
  The court held that Illinois' blanket denial of bail to arrested parole violators pending their final revocation hearing likely violates the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
• Maybelline Co. v. Noxell Corp.
  813 F.2d 901· 8th Cir.· 1987-03-10 ·cited 6×·via Preliminary Injunction
  Venue is improper in the Eastern District of Arkansas because the defendants were not 'doing business' there under the commerce clause standard, nor did the claim arise there.
• Serpas v. Schmidt
  808 F.2d 601· 7th Cir.· 1986-12-19 ·cited 6×·via Preliminary Injunction
  The court should abstain from deciding the constitutional issue to allow Illinois courts to interpret the state statute, which could resolve the case without constitutional adjudication.
• Hale v. Dep't OF Energy
  806 F.2d 910· 9th Cir.· 1986-12-18 ·cited 6×·via Preliminary Injunction
  The court held that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying a preliminary injunction because the Mercury Road stretch within the NTS is a nonpublic forum, and the DOE's regulations were reasonable and viewpoint-neutral.
• Graham v. Teledyne-Continental Motors
  805 F.2d 1386· 9th Cir.· 1986-12-10 ·cited 6×·via Interlocutory Injunction
  The court held that the NTSB did not abuse its discretion in denying the estate's representative participation in the engine teardown investigation, nor did it violate due process.
• Mun. Energy Agency OF Miss. v. BIG Rivers Elec. Corp.
  804 F.2d 338· 5th Cir.· 1986-11-17 ·cited 6×
  The court held that the district court did not err in staying the declaratory judgment action pending arbitration and in refusing to enjoin the separate action to compel arbitration.
• Beermart, Inc. v. The Stroh Brewery Co.
  804 F.2d 409· 7th Cir.· 1986-10-29 ·cited 6×·via Preliminary Injunction
  The court held that a wholesale beer distributor's intentional sale of overage beer, with fraudulent repackaging and false dating, constituted a breach of the distribution agreement justifying immediate termination, and that such conduct barred the distributor from seeking equita
• Brotherhood OF Maintenance OF WAY Employees v. Guilford Transp. Indus., Inc.
  803 F.2d 1228· 1st Cir.· 1986-10-28 ·cited 6×
  The Railway Labor Act (RLA) does not override the Norris-LaGuardia Act to permit enjoining secondary picketing by a labor organization that has exhausted RLA procedures for a major dispute.
• Benkendorf v. Vill. OF Hazel Crest
  804 F.2d 99· 7th Cir.· 1986-10-27 ·cited 6×·via Preliminary Injunction
  The appeal of the denial of a preliminary injunction is dismissed as moot because the challenged ordinance was amended during the pendency of the appeal.
• Gen. Eng'g Corp. v. Virgin Islands Water & Power Auth.
  805 F.2d 88· 3d Cir.· 1986-10-27 ·cited 6×
  The court held that the power-sale agreement between WAPA and CEC did not violate Virgin Islands conflict of interest or competitive bidding statutes, and thus the agreement was valid.
• Stark v. ST. Cloud State Univ.
  802 F.2d 1046· 8th Cir.· 1986-10-08 ·cited 6×
  The student teacher training program neither advances religion nor excessively entangles the state with religion.
• Webster G. Tarpley v. Salerno
  803 F.2d 57· 2d Cir.· 1986-10-06 ·cited 6×
  The court held that candidates are precluded from relitigating constitutional issues already decided by state courts, and the statute is a reasonable election regulation.
• Whildon L. Moyer v. Citicorp Homeowners, Inc.
  799 F.2d 1445· 11th Cir.· 1986-09-22 ·cited 6×
  The dissenting judge holds that the contract's foreclosure notice provision is inconsistent with the DIDMCA and prior case law, and therefore the creditor is not entitled to federal preemption of state usury laws.
• Gower v. Lehman
  799 F.2d 925· 4th Cir.· 1986-09-04 ·cited 6×
  A district court's order transferring a case to the Claims Court under 28 U.S.C. § 1631, based on a finding of lack of jurisdiction, is a final and appealable order.
• Boston & Me. Corp. v. R.M. Lenfest, Jr.
  799 F.2d 795· 1st Cir.· 1986-09-02 ·cited 6×·via Boys Markets Injunction
  A union may call a concerted work stoppage under FRSA § 10(b) when hazardous working conditions result from a system-wide failure to provide adequate protection, and the district court lacked jurisdiction to determine compliance with notice provisions, which must be resolved by t
• Asher B. Edelman v. Fruehauf Corp.
  798 F.2d 882· 6th Cir.· 1986-08-08 ·cited 6×·via Preliminary Injunction
  The court affirmed the district court's preliminary injunction, modifying it to ensure equal treatment of all bidders and requiring specific disclosures.
• Comm. OF Cent. Am. Refugees ("Comite De Refugiados Centro-Americanos" or "Crece") v. Immigr. & Naturalization Serv.
  795 F.2d 1434· 9th Cir.· 1986-07-31 ·cited 6×·via Preliminary Injunction
  The court held that the transfer of unrepresented aliens to detention facilities outside the San Francisco District does not, standing alone, constitute a deprivation of statutory privilege or due process rights, and thus does not warrant judicial intrusion into the Attorney Gene
• Refac Int'l, Ltd. v. IBM
  798 F.2d 459· Fed. Cir.· 1986-07-31 ·cited 6×·via Preliminary Injunction
  The court affirmed the dismissal of the appeal from a non-final order but vacated the award of attorney fees against the appellant.
• Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Dane Cnty. Dairy
  795 F.2d 1313· 7th Cir.· 1986-07-09 ·cited 6×·via Temporary Injunction
  The court held that the respondents failed to show good cause for their untimely answer and that the Board's finding of alter ego status was supported by substantial evidence.
• Adams v. State OF Ind.
  795 F.2d 27· 7th Cir.· 1986-07-03 ·cited 6×·via Claim For Injunction
  The court held that the bankruptcy automatic stay already enjoins tax collection, rendering the injunction request moot, and that damages claims are unripe pending resolution of tax liability in bankruptcy proceedings.
• Fauconniere Mfg. Corp. v. Secretary OF Defense
  794 F.2d 350· 8th Cir.· 1986-06-24 ·cited 6×·via Preliminary Injunction
  The appeal from the preliminary injunction is dismissed as moot because the underlying contract has been fully performed, rendering the injunction's purpose unachievable.
• City OF Paducah v. Inv. Ent., Inc.
  791 F.2d 463· 6th Cir.· 1986-05-28 ·cited 6×
  The court held that the City waived its right to seek abstention by failing to actively pursue the issue. The procedural safeguards of the ordinance were deemed adequate.
• Horgan v. MacMillan, Inc.
  789 F.2d 157· 2d Cir.· 1986-04-28 ·cited 6×·via Preliminary Injunction
  The court held that the district court applied the wrong legal standard for determining copyright infringement by photographs of choreography, and remanded for reconsideration.
• Satellite Dev. Corp. v. Tortoise Island Homeowner's Ass'n, Inc.
  487 So. 2d 1157· Fla. 5th DCA· 1986-04-24 ·cited 6×·via Temporary Injunction
  The court reversed a temporary injunction against a developer's use of a private road, holding that the developer's platted easement for ingress and egress was valid and the homeowner's association failed to establish the prerequisites for injunctive relief.
• United States v. Akers
  785 F.2d 814· 9th Cir.· 1986-03-26 ·cited 6×·via Preliminary Injunction
  The court held that the farmer's extensive wetland alteration activities, aimed at converting them to farmland, were not exempt from Clean Water Act permit requirements and affirmed the preliminary injunction.
• Schuck v. Gilmore Steel Corp.
  784 F.2d 947· 9th Cir.· 1986-03-11 ·cited 6×·via Labor Dispute Injunctions
  The court held that the Norris-LaGuardia Act did not deprive the district court of jurisdiction to hear the case, but affirmed the dismissal for failure to state a claim because ERISA's exception for reversion of excess pension funds applied.
• Burroughs v. Wallingford
  780 F.2d 502· 5th Cir.· 1986-01-13 ·cited 6×·via Suit For Injunction
  The court held that employees complying with IRS tax levies are immune from liability, and the appeal based on meritless arguments against income tax laws is frivolous.
• Mantek Div. OF NCH Corp. v. Share Corp.
  780 F.2d 702· 7th Cir.· 1986-01-07 ·cited 6×·via Preliminary Injunction
  The district court did not err in excluding evidence of commercial bribery as a defense to a preliminary injunction.
• Russell v. Millsap
  781 F.2d 381· 5th Cir.· 1985-12-27 ·cited 6×
  The court held that the district court did not err in dismissing the pro se § 1983 suit as frivolous and in awarding attorneys' fees to the defendants.
• Broward Cnty. v. City OF Fort Lauderdale & Robert O. Cox
  480 So. 2d 631· Fla.· 1985-12-19 ·cited 6×
  The Florida Supreme Court held that Article VIII, Section 1(g) of the Florida Constitution permits charter counties to enact regulatory preemption ordinances that override conflicting municipal ordinances without requiring the dual referenda mandated by Article VIII, Section 4, d
• United States v. Snider
  779 F.2d 1151· 6th Cir.· 1985-12-17 ·cited 6×·via Action For Injunction
  The court held that the government was not required to file its claim for past Medicare overpayments as a compulsory counterclaim in the prior injunction action, and that collateral estoppel applied to preclude relitigation of the issue of whether the services provided constitute
• J.A. Croson Co. v. City OF Richmond
  779 F.2d 181· 4th Cir.· 1985-11-25 ·cited 6×
  A city ordinance establishing a racial set-aside for public contracts is invalid because the city lacked state authority to enact it and failed to make adequate factual findings to justify the racial classification under federal law.
• The Nat'l Wildlife Fed'n v. Coston
  773 F.2d 1513· 9th Cir.· 1985-10-15 ·cited 6×·via Preliminary Injunction
  The court held that the district court did not abuse its discretion or rely on an erroneous legal premise in denying the preliminary injunction, as the plaintiffs failed to demonstrate a sufficient likelihood of success on the merits of their NEPA and APA claims.
• U.S. Floral Corp. v. Salazar
  475 So. 2d 1305· Fla. 3d DCA· 1985-09-24 ·cited 6×·via Temporary Injunction