-
267 F.2d 817·
2d Cir.·
1959-06-25
The federal court affirmed the denial of the writ of habeas corpus because the state provides a remedy for the petitioner's claims.
-
261 F.2d 345·
4th Cir.·
1958-11-13
The court affirmed the denial of the writ of habeas corpus, finding the petitioner waived his speedy trial rights and failed to exhaust state remedies.
-
257 F.2d 295·
2d Cir.·
1958-07-02
The court held that there was no probable cause for appeal from the denial of a writ of habeas corpus, as the petitioner's constitutional rights were fully protected.
-
249 F.2d 41·
5th Cir.·
1957-11-06
A federal court cannot grant habeas corpus if the petitioner has not exhausted adequate state remedies, even if the petitioner escaped from jail.
-
248 F.2d 809·
1st Cir.·
1957-10-25
A state prisoner seeking federal habeas corpus relief must exhaust all available state remedies, including petitioning the U.S. Supreme Court for a writ of certiorari from an adverse state supreme court decision.
-
244 F.2d 495·
8th Cir.·
1957-05-07
A federal district court must hold a hearing on a habeas corpus petition alleging knowing use of perjured testimony, unless specific exceptions apply, even if state courts denied relief on procedural grounds.
-
234 F.2d 404·
7th Cir.·
1956-06-14
The District Court correctly refused to reopen a habeas corpus proceeding after a final order had been entered dismissing the cause.
-
232 F.2d 734·
10th Cir.·
1956-04-16
The court held that the petitioner had not exhausted his state remedies and that the alleged jury irregularities were not a denial of due process that would render the judgment void.
-
232 F.2d 630·
10th Cir.·
1956-04-02
A federal court cannot entertain a habeas corpus petition challenging state court commitment if the petitioner has not exhausted all available state remedies, including seeking certiorari from the U.S. Supreme Court.
-
229 F.2d 432·
6th Cir.·
1955-12-19
The court held that a prisoner cannot seek federal injunction against a state parole warrant when state remedies are available and federal law permits transfer of custody.
-
224 F.2d 608·
10th Cir.·
1955-07-21
The court held that the Oklahoma statute requiring the designation of a candidate's race as 'Negro' on election ballots, when applied to candidates of African descent, constitutes a denial of equal protection under the Fourteenth Amendment.
-
223 F.2d 680·
9th Cir.·
1955-06-03
The court held that a federal district court lacks jurisdiction to entertain a state prisoner's habeas corpus application if the prisoner has not exhausted available state remedies.
-
216 F.2d 675·
6th Cir.·
1954-11-15
The court held that it lacked jurisdiction to entertain the petition as presented, and that the petitioner had not exhausted his state remedies.
-
205 F.2d 676·
6th Cir.·
1953-06-17
The court held that the District Court correctly dismissed the habeas corpus petition because the petitioner failed to exhaust state remedies as required by 28 U.S.C. § 2254.
-
205 F.2d 236·
9th Cir.·
1953-04-27
The court held that the district court had jurisdiction to entertain the habeas corpus application, even though state remedies were not fully exhausted and certiorari had been denied, because the circumstances rendered the normal process ineffective.
-
197 F.2d 856·
3d Cir.·
1952-07-02
-
196 F.2d 785·
3d Cir.·
1952-04-30
The court held that the endorsements on the bill of indictment, not the docket entries, constitute the primary record of the proceeding, and thus the sentence was not excessive.
-
167 F.2d 110·
9th Cir.·
1948-04-07
The court denied the petitioner's application for a certificate of probable cause, finding that he had not exhausted his state remedies by failing to seek certiorari from the denial of his state habeas corpus petition.
-
167 F.2d 221·
4th Cir.·
1948-03-23
The court held that the district court's dismissal of the habeas corpus petition was proper.
-
162 F.2d 334·
9th Cir.·
1947-05-27
The court held that a petitioner must make a good faith attempt to seek redress in state courts, even if state jurisprudence is unsettled, before seeking federal habeas corpus relief.
-
162 F.2d 336·
9th Cir.·
1947-05-27
The court held that the appellant's assertion of impossibility to file a timely appeal from a state court denial of a writ of error coram nobis was insufficient to excuse his failure to exhaust state remedies, especially given potential flexibility in state appeal rules.
-
158 F.2d 87·
7th Cir.·
1946-11-05
The court held that a federal court cannot grant habeas corpus relief until the petitioner has exhausted available state remedies.
-
154 F.2d 288·
7th Cir.·
1946-03-21
The court held that the petitioner's habeas corpus petition was properly dismissed because he had not exhausted state remedies and the Illinois indeterminate sentence act has been repeatedly upheld by the Illinois Supreme Court.
-
154 F.2d 500·
7th Cir.·
1946-02-06
The appeal is dismissed because the petitioner failed to obtain a certificate of probable cause and did not exhaust state court remedies.
-
152 F.2d 453·
7th Cir.·
1945-12-06
The court held that a petitioner who received habeas corpus relief due to an illegal transfer can be re-imprisoned if the original cause was legal and proper forms are observed.
-
146 F.2d 517·
7th Cir.·
1945-01-10
The court affirmed the dismissal of the prisoner's petition.
-
135 F.2d 205·
7th Cir.·
1943-04-23
The District Court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to grant the writ of habeas corpus.