UNITED STATES EX REL. DAVIS
v.
RAGEN, WARDEN

7th Cir. | 1946-03-21
No. 9050
154 F.2d 288 United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit (1946)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court held that the petitioner's habeas corpus petition was properly dismissed because he had not exhausted state remedies and the Illinois indeterminate sentence act has been repeatedly upheld by the Illinois Supreme Court.


Facts & Procedural History

Petitioner was convicted of armed robbery and sentenced under Illinois' indeterminate sentence act. He filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus, w…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner is confined in the Illinois State Penitentiary for a term of one year to life by virtue of a conviction and sentence for armed robbery. He sought his release by filing petition for a writ of habeas corpus in the District Court. From an order of January 16, 1946, dismissing his petition, petitioner appeals. Since the trial judge has signed a certificate of probable cause, we hereby grant the petitioner leave to proceed in this court in forma pauperis.

Petitioner’s appeal presents but one question, i. e., whether the indeterminate sentence act of Illinois, Ill.Rev.Stat.1945, c. 38, § 801 et seq., is violative of the Constitution. The Illinois Supreme Court has decided this question many times adversely to petitioner’s contention. People v. Segal, 306 Ill. 301, 137 N.E. 815; People v. Hawkins, 306 Ill. 29, 137 N.E. 385; People v. Bernstein, 304 Ill. 351, 136 N.E. 683; People v. Roche, 389 Ill. 361, 59 N.E. 2d 866. We are bound by this interpretation. Whit-ten v. Bennett, 7 Cir., 141 F. 2d 295; United States ex rel. Foley v. Ragen, 7 Cir., 143 F. 2d 774.

It is also apparent that the requirements of White v. Ragen, 324 U.S. 760, 65 S.Ct. 978, as to exhaustion of state court remedies have not been met.

The order of the District Court is affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw