-
Del. Ch.·
2025-06-11
The Court of Chancery properly dismissed the plaintiff's claims for breach of fiduciary duty and aiding and abetting. The claims arising from alleged misconduct predating the defendants' tenure on the board were time-barred. Furthermore, the plaintiff's attempt to recharacterize
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-06-04
The court held that the plaintiff's motion to vacate his conviction was untimely and that his double jeopardy claim was meritless, thus denying the motion.
-
138 F.4th 1312·
11th Cir.·
2025-05-29
The Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) did not abuse its discretion in denying the petitioner's motion to reopen removal proceedings as untimely and procedurally barred, because the Supreme Court's decision in Niz-Chavez v. Garland does not apply to the continuous residence requi
-
N.D. Fla.·
2025-05-28
The ninety-day period to file suit under the ADA begins when the EEOC issues a notice of right-to-sue, not when the plaintiff actually reads it.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-05-21
The court held that the petitioner's motion to vacate his sentence was untimely and his claims lacked merit, as his prior conviction for resisting an officer with violence qualifies as a crime of violence for sentencing enhancement purposes.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2025-05-15
The court held that the petition to quash an IRS summons must be dismissed for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction because the summons was served on the person whose liability was at issue, and also because the petition was filed untimely.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-05-14
The court held that the petitioner's federal habeas corpus petition was untimely filed under AEDPA's one-year statute of limitations, and equitable tolling was not warranted.
-
N.D. Fla.·
2025-05-09
The court held that the plaintiff's claims for unlawful stop, seizure, and false arrest were time-barred by the statute of limitations, and the malicious prosecution claim failed for failure to state a claim.
-
N.D. Fla.·
2025-05-09
The court held that the petitioner's federal habeas corpus petition was timely filed under the AEDPA, despite the respondent's motion to dismiss based on untimeliness.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-05-08
The federal habeas petition is dismissed as time-barred because it was filed outside the one-year limitations period established by AEDPA, and no tolling or equitable exceptions apply.
-
N.D. Fla.·
2025-05-06
The amended petition's claims do not relate back to the timely filed original petition and are therefore untimely.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-05-02
The court held that the plaintiff's complaint was untimely filed because he failed to demonstrate that he was faultless for the delay in receiving the Notice of Right to Sue, and his alleged personal hardships did not warrant equitable tolling.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2025-04-30
The court held that a pro se petitioner's habeas corpus petition was time-barred under AEDPA's one-year statute of limitations because it was filed long after the limitations period expired and the petitioner failed to establish grounds for equitable tolling or the actual innocen
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-04-28
The court held that the petitioner's habeas corpus petition was untimely filed and dismissed it, finding no basis for actual innocence or equitable tolling.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-04-25
The court held that the defendants' offer of judgment was valid and timely filed, and that the plaintiff failed to prove the offer was made in bad faith.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-04-25
The court held that the petitioner's habeas corpus petition was untimely filed under AEDPA and denied equitable tolling.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-04-24
The court held that the prisoner's motion to vacate his sentence was untimely, not cognizable, procedurally defaulted, and meritless, and therefore denied.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-04-23
The court held that the federal habeas petition was untimely filed and dismissed it as time-barred because the petitioner failed to demonstrate entitlement to equitable tolling.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-04-23
The court held that the applicant's habeas corpus petition was time-barred and not subject to equitable tolling or the actual innocence exception.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-04-23
The court recommended denying the plaintiff's motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis because his appeal is not taken in good faith, as his claims are time-barred.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-04-21
The court held that the defendant's motion to vacate his sentence is denied because it is procedurally barred, meritless, and untimely.
-
Del. Super. Ct.·
2025-04-21
The court denied the defendants' motion for summary judgment, finding that genuine issues of material fact exist regarding whether the statute of limitations was tolled. The court determined that under Delaware's borrowing statute, Delaware's tolling doctrines apply, and the plai
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-04-15
The court held that the petitioner's habeas corpus petition was untimely filed and dismissed it with prejudice.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-04-11
The court held that the claims in the amended petition are time-barred under AEDPA because they do not relate back to the initial petition and equitable tolling is not warranted.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-04-07
The court held that the petitioner's habeas corpus petition was untimely filed and dismissed it with prejudice.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-04-02
The court held that the petitioner's motion to vacate his sentence was untimely and, alternatively, lacked merit because his counsel's decision not to challenge the traffic stop was a reasonable strategic choice given the petitioner's admission of speeding.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-04-01
The court held that the petitioner's federal habeas corpus petition was time-barred under the Anti-Terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (AEDPA) because it was filed long after the one-year limitations period expired.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-03-31
The court held that the petitioner's federal habeas corpus petition was time-barred because it was filed more than one year after the judgment became final and no tolling events occurred.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-03-28
The court held that the plaintiff's federal court appeal was untimely and equitable tolling did not apply because the plaintiff failed to demonstrate extraordinary circumstances justifying the delay.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2025-03-28
The petition for writ of habeas corpus is dismissed as untimely because it was filed outside the one-year limitations period established by AEDPA, and the petitioner has not demonstrated entitlement to statutory or equitable tolling, nor any exception to the time bar.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-03-25
The court held that the petitioner's habeas corpus petition appears untimely under AEDPA, and the petitioner must show cause why it should not be dismissed.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2025-03-18
The court held that the plaintiffs failed to properly present their administrative tort claims to the USPS within the statutory timeframe, thus barring their suit under the FTCA.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-03-13
A federal habeas petition is time-barred if filed after the one-year limitations period, and reliance on misinformation from a prison law clerk does not constitute an extraordinary circumstance for equitable tolling.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-03-11
The court held that the petitioner's federal habeas petition was untimely filed and that he was not entitled to equitable tolling.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2025-03-04
Dr. Hernandez and his company EGLA alleged that Stingray Digital Group and related defendants misappropriated proprietary audio and video technology, trade secrets, and patents developed by Dr. Hernandez, and that Stingray gained unauthorized access to this technology after acqui
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-03-03
The court held that the petitioner's federal habeas petition was filed outside the one-year statute of limitations established by AEDPA and was therefore dismissed as time-barred.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-02-27
The court held that the petitioner's habeas corpus petition was untimely filed and not subject to equitable tolling.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-02-25
The court held that the petitioner's federal habeas petition was time-barred under AEDPA because he failed to demonstrate reasonable diligence in pursuing his rights or extraordinary circumstances justifying equitable tolling.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2025-02-14
The court held that the plaintiffs' breach of contract and unjust enrichment claims were barred by the applicable statutes of limitations, and therefore denied the plaintiffs' motion for partial summary judgment and granted the defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings on
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-02-13
The court granted the motion to dismiss, finding the amended complaint to be a shotgun pleading and the ADA/GINA claims time-barred.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-02-12
The court held that the petitioner's federal habeas petition was time-barred under AEDPA and that equitable tolling was not warranted.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2025-02-05
The court held that plaintiff's hostile work environment and constructive discharge claims (Counts IV and V) were adequately pleaded based on the EEOC charge, but the FLSA claim (Count VI) was dismissed for failure to state timeliness and compliance with court notice. The age dis
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-01-30
The court held that the plaintiff's motion for reconsideration of the denial of leave to amend was denied because it failed to establish clear error of law and largely attempted to relitigate previously decided issues. The motion for extension of time was granted.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-01-29
The court held that the petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus is time-barred under the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act.
-
N.D. Fla.·
2025-01-28
The court held that the petitioner's habeas petition was untimely filed and he failed to establish entitlement to equitable tolling.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2025-01-22
The federal habeas petition is dismissed as time-barred because it was filed after the one-year limitations period expired and the petitioner did not demonstrate entitlement to equitable tolling or actual innocence.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-01-21
The court held that the petitioner's habeas corpus petition was untimely filed under AEDPA and dismissed it with prejudice.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2025-01-21
The court held that the plaintiff's FCRA claim was time-barred because she discovered the violation more than two years before filing suit, and amendment would be futile. The court also dismissed the Florida statutory claim for failure to state a claim.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-01-14
The court held that the petitioner's habeas corpus petition was untimely and dismissed it.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-01-14
The court held that the petitioner's motion to vacate his sentence was untimely filed and therefore dismissed with prejudice.