-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-12-19
A district court lacks jurisdiction to consider a second or successive habeas corpus petition if the petitioner has not obtained authorization from the appropriate court of appeals.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-12-17
The court held that the habeas corpus application was time-barred because the applicant failed to demonstrate entitlement to equitable tolling and did not properly toll the limitations period through state post-conviction proceedings.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-12-08
The court held that the petitioner's federal habeas corpus petition was time-barred under AEDPA because it was filed more than one year after his convictions became final, and no exceptions applied.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-12-03
The court held that the plaintiff's claims under the Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act were time-barred, as she failed to demonstrate diligence or extraordinary circumstances to justify equitable tolling or the delayed discovery doctrine.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-11-25
The court held that a stay of habeas corpus proceedings is not warranted when the petitioner has not demonstrated that a stay would serve any purpose other than delay, which is contrary to the AEDPA's goals.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2025-11-24
The court held that the plaintiff's claims are time-barred and that she has failed to sufficiently plead equitable tolling or Rule 15 relation-back.
-
Del. Super. Ct.·
2025-11-19
The Superior Court denied the defendants' motion to dismiss, finding that the plaintiff's legal malpractice claims were not barred by the statute of limitations. The court held that the continuous representation doctrine could delay the accrual of the cause of action, and that th
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-11-18
The court held that the petitioner's habeas corpus petition was untimely filed and therefore dismissed with prejudice.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-11-14
The court held that the petitioner's habeas corpus petition was untimely filed and dismissed it with prejudice.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-11-14
The court held that the petitioner's habeas corpus petition was time-barred under the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (AEDPA) because it was filed after the one-year limitation period expired. The court also denied a certificate of appealability.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2025-11-10
The court held that the petitioner's federal habeas petition was untimely under AEDPA and that he failed to satisfy any exceptions to the limitations period.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-11-05
The federal habeas petition was dismissed as untimely because it was filed outside the one-year statute of limitations, and the petitioner's state post-conviction motion did not toll the period as it was filed after the deadline expired.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2025-11-04
The court held that the plaintiff's claims are time-barred because the current lawsuit was filed outside the statutory limitations period, and the prior dismissal, though without prejudice, was effectively with prejudice due to the statute of limitations.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-11-04
The court held that the petitioner's habeas corpus petition was untimely filed under the one-year limitations period imposed by AEDPA, and equitable tolling was not warranted.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-11-04
The court held that the petition for a writ of habeas corpus was untimely filed, as it was filed more than six years after the one-year limitations period expired.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-11-03
The court held that the petitioner's habeas corpus petition was untimely filed and dismissed it with prejudice.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-10-31
The federal habeas petition is dismissed as time-barred because it was filed outside the one-year limitations period prescribed by the AEDPA. A certificate of appealability is denied as reasonable jurists would not debate the procedural issue of untimeliness.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-10-30
The court held that a prior dismissal without prejudice for failure to pay a filing fee does not preserve a cause of action outside the statute of limitations, nor does it warrant equitable tolling.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-10-28
The court held that the petitioner's habeas corpus petition was time-barred under the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (AEDPA).
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-10-21
The court held that the plaintiff's claims were time-barred because they were filed after the expiration of the applicable statute of limitations, and equitable tolling was not warranted.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-10-14
The court held that the petitioner's motion to vacate his conviction was untimely filed and ordered him to show cause why it should not be dismissed.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-10-07
The court held that the plaintiff's motion to appeal in forma pauperis is frivolous and lacks good faith, and therefore must be denied.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-10-07
The federal habeas corpus petition is dismissed as time-barred because the petitioner failed to file within the one-year limitations period prescribed by AEDPA. An amended judgment entered nunc pro tunc does not reset the limitations clock.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-10-06
The court held that the motion to vacate the conviction under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 was time-barred because it was filed outside the one-year statute of limitations, and the defendant failed to establish entitlement to equitable tolling.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2025-09-30
The court held that the pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus was untimely under the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (AEDPA) because it was filed more than eight years after the one-year limitation period expired, and the petitioner failed to establish actual
-
N.D. Fla.·
2025-09-15
Segwayne Kirk Anthony Goldson challenged his 2016 conviction for sexual battery by filing a federal habeas petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, raising claims of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel regarding a sentencing enhancement and ineffective assistance of trial counsel
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-09-10
A petitioner is not 'in custody' for habeas corpus purposes if their sentence has fully expired, even if collateral consequences remain.
-
N.D. Fla.·
2025-09-08
An attorney's negligence, even gross negligence, does not constitute the extraordinary circumstances required for equitable tolling of a federal habeas petition deadline.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-09-04
The court held that the petitioner's habeas petition was untimely because it was filed nearly two years after the one-year limitations period expired, and his claim of mental disability did not warrant equitable tolling.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-09-03
The court denied the petitioner's motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction, finding he was unlikely to succeed on the merits and that injunctive relief was not in the public interest.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-08-25
The court held that the petitioner's federal habeas corpus petition was time-barred because he failed to demonstrate the necessary diligence for equitable tolling.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-08-05
The court held that Plaintiff's Title VII claims are time-barred due to failure to file a timely EEOC charge, and her procedural due process claim fails because an adequate state remedy exists.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-08-04
The court held that the amended petition for writ of habeas corpus was time-barred under the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (AEDPA). A certificate of appealability is not warranted.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2025-08-03
The court held that Title VII claims are time-barred due to untimeliness and failure to establish equitable tolling, but FCRA claims are timely because the EEOC notice did not constitute a determination of reasonable cause, triggering a one-year limitations period.
-
N.D. Fla.·
2025-08-01
The court held that the petitioner's habeas corpus petition was untimely filed and not entitled to equitable tolling or the actual innocence exception.
-
N.D. Fla.·
2025-07-30
The court held that the plaintiff's TILA claim was time-barred even with equitable tolling, and declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over state law claims.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-07-28
The court held that the petitioner's motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence was time-barred and equitable tolling was not warranted, thus dismissing the motion.
-
Del. Ch.·
2025-07-25
The Court of Chancery dismissed the plaintiffs' claims, finding a lack of personal jurisdiction over Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company, no standing for the breach of contract claim, and that the remaining claims were either time-barred or failed to state a claim upon whi
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-07-21
The court denied the defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings because the issue of equitable tolling could not be resolved solely on the pleadings, and the complaint was not a shotgun pleading.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-07-21
The court held that the petitioner's federal habeas corpus petition was untimely filed under AEDPA's one-year statute of limitations, and equitable tolling and actual innocence exceptions did not apply.
-
11th Cir.·
2025-07-21
Dr. Joseph Jimenez, a Hispanic federal prison medical officer, challenged his former employer's decision to require him to work correctional officer shifts while non-Hispanic physicians were exempt, and the denial of his accommodation request for mental health disabilities. The E
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-07-16
The court held that the petitioner's federal habeas corpus petition was untimely and not subject to equitable tolling because she failed to demonstrate extraordinary circumstances and lacked diligence in pursuing her rights.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-07-15
The court held that the petitioner's federal habeas corpus petition was time-barred because he failed to demonstrate extraordinary circumstances justifying equitable tolling and did not act with reasonable diligence.
-
N.D. Fla.·
2025-07-14
The court held that while the Rooker-Feldman doctrine and res judicata do not apply, the plaintiff's claims are time-barred by the statute of limitations, and the only non-time-barred claim involves a private actor not subject to § 1983.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2025-07-09
The court held that the plaintiff's claims against the New Jersey defendants were time-barred and that venue was improper for the remaining claims, warranting transfer to the Southern District of Florida.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-07-03
The court held that it lacks jurisdiction to grant an extension of time to file a habeas petition before the petition itself has been filed.
-
S.D. Fla.·
2025-06-29
The court held that the pro se prisoner's complaint failed to state a claim for relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and was also likely barred by the statute of limitations.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-06-27
The court held that the petitioner is entitled to equitable tolling, making his federal habeas petition timely filed.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-06-17
The court held that the Class Action Fairness Act (CAFA) does not provide an independent basis for subject matter jurisdiction for claims brought solely under the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act (MMWA) when the MMWA's own jurisdictional requirements are not met.
-
M.D. Fla.·
2025-06-17
The court held that the petitioner's habeas corpus petition was untimely filed and denied his request for equitable tolling, as the circumstances did not constitute extraordinary reasons for delay.