Aiding And Abetting

3,842 Florida cases classified under this topic · sorted by citation count

• United States v. Zare Tirinkian
  488 F.2d 873· 2d Cir.· 1973-12-07 ·cited 4×
  The court held that the admission of testimony regarding a co-conspirator's possession of a large sum of cash was proper, and the appellant's claim regarding speedy trial rights was without merit.
• United States v. Rosinski
  487 F.2d 822· 6th Cir.· 1973-12-04 ·cited 4×
  The court held that the evidence was sufficient to support the conviction and that the trial court did not err in its handling of a co-defendant's testimony and guilty plea.
• United States v. Pauldino
  487 F.2d 127· 10th Cir.· 1973-11-12 ·cited 4×
  The court held that the evidence was sufficient to convict the defendant of receiving stolen property, and that his other contentions regarding attorney-client privilege, admissibility of his statement, and prosecutorial misconduct were without merit.
• United States v. Pomeroy
  485 F.2d 272· 9th Cir.· 1973-09-26 ·cited 4×
  The court held that the trial judge did not err in denying motions for continuance and bail reduction, nor in refusing to appoint new counsel, and that the defendant intelligently waived his right to counsel and was not denied his right to proceed pro se.
• United States v. Rose
  484 F.2d 654· 5th Cir.· 1973-09-21 ·cited 4×
  The court held that the evidence was sufficient to convict the defendant for aiding and abetting drug distribution.
• United States v. Dodson
  481 F.2d 656· 5th Cir.· 1973-07-16 ·cited 4×
  The court held that the evidence was sufficient to sustain the conviction and that entrapment was not established as a matter of law.
• United States v. Santos
  483 F.2d 35· 5th Cir.· 1973-07-09 ·cited 4×
  The court held that there was sufficient evidence to convict the appellants and that the trial court did not commit plain error by failing to give a cautionary instruction.
• United States v. Stembridge
  477 F.2d 874· 5th Cir.· 1973-04-13 ·cited 4×
  The court held that the use of disguised handwriting exemplars and the admission of testimony regarding the disguise does not violate the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination.
• United States v. Willene McCOWAN
  471 F.2d 361· 10th Cir.· 1972-12-21 ·cited 4×
  The court held that the trial court did not err in its evidentiary rulings or in denying motions for acquittal, as sufficient evidence supported the convictions and the rulings did not constitute prejudicial error.
• United States v. Young
  468 F.2d 595· 8th Cir.· 1972-10-25 ·cited 4×
  The court held that the evidence was sufficient to support the conviction for aiding and abetting armed robbery, and that the FBI agent's admonitions to witnesses did not constitute coercion.
• Selig Kaminski v. United States
  460 F.2d 996· 5th Cir.· 1972-05-15 ·cited 4×
  The evidence was insufficient to support a jury's conclusion that the defendant was guilty of breaking into and damaging the post office.
• United States v. Wright
  459 F.2d 65· 8th Cir.· 1972-05-09 ·cited 4×
  The court held that the trial court's jury instructions and comments on evidence did not constitute prejudicial error, and thus affirmed the conviction.
• Barlow v. State
  255 So. 2d 559· Fla. 1st DCA· 1971-12-14 ·cited 4×
  Betty and Vernon Barlow were charged with shooting into an occupied dwelling. Vernon Barlow's conviction was affirmed because sufficient evidence supported the charge, but Betty Barlow's conviction was reversed because the evidence failed to show she knowingly aided, abetted, or
• United States v. Yaple
  450 F.2d 308· 9th Cir.· 1971-10-14 ·cited 4×
  The court held that the evidence was sufficient to sustain the convictions and that the indictment stated sufficient facts to constitute a crime.
• United States v. Howell
  447 F.2d 1114· 2d Cir.· 1971-08-27 ·cited 4×
  The court held that the defendant voluntarily waived his Miranda rights and that the jury charge on aiding and abetting was sufficient.
• United States v. Johnson
  447 F.2d 31· 7th Cir.· 1971-07-19 ·cited 4×
  The court held that the evidence was sufficient to prove the defendant's specific intent to aid and abet embezzlement, and the jury instructions were adequate.
• United States v. Bickford
  445 F.2d 829· 1st Cir.· 1971-07-14 ·cited 4×
  The court held that the evidence presented was sufficient to establish threshold proof of a conspiracy, the co-conspirator's statement was made in furtherance of the conspiracy, and the jury instructions, when considered as a whole, were not erroneous.
• United States v. Heard
  443 F.2d 856· 6th Cir.· 1971-06-04 ·cited 4×
  The court held that the delay in bringing the appellants to trial did not violate their constitutional right to a speedy trial, and there was no fatal variance between the indictment and the proofs.
• United States v. Samaniego
  437 F.2d 1244· 9th Cir.· 1971-02-04 ·cited 4×
  The court held that the evidence was sufficient to convict the defendant of aiding and abetting a bank robbery, and that the trial judge's alleged bias and refusal to disclose the full probation report were not grounds for reversal.
• United States v. Crank
  438 F.2d 635· 9th Cir.· 1971-02-03 ·cited 4×
  The court held that the appellant's guilty pleas were validly entered and that his claims of Rule 11 non-compliance and coercion by counsel were without merit.
• Claudio Carranza-Chaidez v. United States
  414 F.2d 503· 9th Cir.· 1969-07-31 ·cited 4×
  The court held that jury instructions regarding witness credibility and the refusal of a requested instruction on uncalled witnesses were not prejudicial error, and venue was properly established.
• United States v. Wingo
  394 F.2d 484· 6th Cir.· 1968-04-12 ·cited 4×
  The court held that the evidence was sufficient to support the jury's verdict on all counts, and the jury instructions were not erroneous.
• United States v. Heithaus
  391 F.2d 810· 3d Cir.· 1968-03-27 ·cited 4×
  The dissenting judge would affirm the conviction on Count II, finding sufficient evidence that the appellant knowingly aided and abetted a scheme involving false loan applications.
• Johnson v. United States
  390 F.2d 517· 9th Cir.· 1968-02-16 ·cited 4×
  The court held that the trial court erred by not conducting a separate hearing on whether the defendant's confessions were obtained in violation of Escobedo or were involuntary, as required by Jackson v. Denno.
• United States v. Sacasas
  381 F.2d 451· 2d Cir.· 1967-08-09 ·cited 4×
  The court held that the trial court did not err in denying the defendant's motion for a directed verdict, refusing to allow examination of Jencks Act material, or denying a motion for a new trial based on inadmissible hearsay.
• Norman v. United States
  379 F.2d 164· D.C. Cir.· 1967-05-09 ·cited 4×
  The court held that the convictions for housebreaking and grand larceny were just, based upon adequate evidence, and free of error involving substantial rights.
• Grant v. United States
  371 F.2d 400· 9th Cir.· 1967-01-19 ·cited 4×
  The court held that the evidence was sufficient to convict and that the defendants were not denied adequate representation by counsel.
• Lugo v. United States
  370 F.2d 992· 9th Cir.· 1967-01-09 ·cited 4×
  The court held that the appellant's counsel had a strategic choice whether to call a potentially impeachable witness, and was not prevented from doing so by alleged coercion.
• Nesbert W. COX and Marvin P. McGuire v. United States
  370 F.2d 563· 9th Cir.· 1967-01-05 ·cited 4×
  The court vacated the convictions and directed dismissal of the indictment, following Supreme Court precedent.
• United States v. Crescenzio Ramirez
  367 F.2d 813· 7th Cir.· 1966-09-21 ·cited 4×
  The court held that the evidence was sufficient to support the guilty verdict and that the prosecutor's statements did not constitute reversible error, especially given the jury's admonitions.
• King v. United States
  364 F.2d 235· 5th Cir.· 1966-07-29 ·cited 4×
  The court held that the firearms were not subject to forfeiture because the government failed to prove that the purchaser willfully caused a violation of the Federal Firearms Act's record-keeping requirements.
• Manja T. Bronner v. Goldman
  361 F.2d 759· 1st Cir.· 1966-05-19 ·cited 4×
  The court held that the defendants, as lenders, were not subject to securities margin requirements, and even if they aided and abetted a broker's violation, the loan itself was lawful and the borrower was not entitled to rescission or damages against the lender.
• United States v. Louchis Faulkner
  360 F.2d 880· 7th Cir.· 1966-05-11 ·cited 4×
  The court held that the evidence was sufficient to support the jury's verdict of guilt for selling narcotics, finding the defendant was an aider and abettor.
• United States v. Gilchrist
  347 F.2d 715· 2d Cir.· 1965-06-28 ·cited 4×
  The court held that the defendant's claims regarding unlawful arrest, lack of preliminary hearing, and insufficient indictment were without merit.
• United States v. Berata
  343 F.2d 469· 2d Cir.· 1965-03-30 ·cited 4×
  The court held that the trial judge's refusal to re-examine grand jury minutes was not reversible error, even if minor inconsistencies existed.
• United States v. Quagliato
  343 F.2d 533· 7th Cir.· 1965-03-23 ·cited 4×
  The court held that the evidence presented was sufficient to support the jury's verdict of guilt for aiding and abetting, and the jury instruction was legally correct.
• Harding v. United States
  335 F.2d 515· 9th Cir.· 1964-08-11 ·cited 4×
  The court held that the trial judge's comments to the jury regarding witness credibility constituted plain error and prejudiced the jury's ability to fairly consider the evidence.
• White v. United States
  330 F.2d 993· 5th Cir.· 1964-04-28 ·cited 4×
  The court held that the evidence, including the appellant's own extra-judicial statements corroborated by independent evidence, was sufficient to support the jury's verdict of guilt.
• United States v. Taylor
  312 F.2d 159· 7th Cir.· 1963-01-14 ·cited 4×
  The court held that the evidence was sufficient to sustain the conviction and that the cross-examination regarding the defendant's drug addiction was permissible.
• United States v. Hawkins
  295 F.2d 837· 6th Cir.· 1961-11-24 ·cited 4×
  The court held that the evidence was sufficient to support the jury's verdict of guilty for concealing material facts and making false statements to the Federal Housing Administration, and that the trial judge's comments on the evidence were permissible.
• Conger v. State
  130 So. 2d 292· Fla. 3d DCA· 1961-05-22 ·cited 4×
  Appellant W.C. Conger, Jr., the president of Conger Plastering, Inc., was convicted of embezzlement under Florida Statute § 84.07(3) for misusing corporate funds. The appellate court reversed his conviction, holding that the statute applies only to a specific class of individuals
• Dendy v. United States
  290 F.2d 222· 2d Cir.· 1961-05-08 ·cited 4×
  The court held that the indictment was sufficient and no error occurred during trial or sentencing.
• la Fever v. United States
  279 F.2d 833· 7th Cir.· 1960-06-28 ·cited 4×
  A voluntary guilty plea admits all essential allegations of the indictment, precluding a collateral attack on jurisdiction based on facts that were admitted.
• Allen v. United States
  257 F.2d 188· D.C. Cir.· 1958-04-24 ·cited 4×
  The court held that the evidence presented was insufficient to convict the appellant of aiding and abetting the unauthorized use of a motor vehicle.
• Wilder v. United States
  246 F.2d 186· 5th Cir.· 1957-07-16 ·cited 4×
  The court held that the trial court did not err in its handling of the jury's verdict or in its instructions, and that the prosecutor's argument, as presented, was not reversible error.
• United States v. Gumbs
  246 F.2d 441· 2d Cir.· 1957-07-11 ·cited 4×
• Collis v. United States
  247 F.2d 566· D.C. Cir.· 1957-06-27 ·cited 4×
  The court held that the evidence was insufficient to establish the appellant's possession of narcotics or his participation in a purchase, thus a reasonable doubt existed as to his guilt.
• Sykes v. United States
  224 F.2d 313· 4th Cir.· 1955-07-14 ·cited 4×
  The court held that the appeal was frivolous and should be dismissed, finding no merit in the appellant's contentions regarding FDIC insurance and the sufficiency of evidence.
• Holland Furnace Co. v. United States
  158 F.2d 2· 6th Cir.· 1946-12-04 ·cited 4×
  The court held that the Holland Furnace Company could not be held criminally liable for its salesman's violation of War Production Board Order L79 because the salesman acted against the company's express instructions and without its knowledge, and the order provided a defense for
• Caldwell v. United States
  139 F.2d 121· 5th Cir.· 1943-12-02 ·cited 4×
  The court held that the evidence presented was insufficient to support the jury's verdicts of guilt against the appellant on either count of the indictment.