Aiding And Abetting

3,842 Florida cases classified under this topic · sorted by citation count

• Eaton v. Coal Par of W. Va., Inc.
  580 F. Supp. 572· S.D. Fla.· 1984-02-13 ·cited 4×
  The court held that fraud allegations were sufficiently particularized, the statute of limitations was tolled by fraudulent concealment, and a private right of action could not be implied under Fla. Stat. § 517.03(1).
• United States v. Perez-Robles
  718 F.2d 700· 5th Cir.· 1983-10-17 ·cited 4×
  The court held that a mistrial was not required despite prejudicial 'other-crime' testimony because the overwhelming evidence of guilt rendered the improper statement without substantial impact on the jury's verdict.
• United States v. Berry A. Mauldin
  714 F.2d 854· 8th Cir.· 1983-08-19 ·cited 4×
  The court held that the trial court did not err in denying a hearing on alleged juror incompetence or a new trial, and that sufficient evidence supported the conviction.
• Janet M. Sanders/Miller v. Logan
  710 F.2d 645· 10th Cir.· 1983-06-13 ·cited 4×
  The court held that the evidence was insufficient to support a first-degree murder conviction for aiding and abetting, as there was no proof Sanders had full knowledge of the perpetrator's intent to kill.
• United States v. Medina
  709 F.2d 155· 2d Cir.· 1983-05-27 ·cited 4×
  The court held that collateral estoppel does not bar reprosecution of a count on which the jury was unable to reach a verdict, as the defendant failed to prove the prior verdict necessarily resolved issues in his favor.
• United States v. Luke
  701 F.2d 1104· 4th Cir.· 1983-03-03 ·cited 4×
  The court held that the loan to Sun Carpet, which was a strawman for Mastertrax, constituted a willful misapplication of bank funds and a false entry, supporting the defendants' convictions.
• United States v. Carlisle
  693 F.2d 322· 4th Cir.· 1982-11-11 ·cited 4×
  The court held that check-kiting is not an offense within the terms of 18 U.S.C. § 1014, based on Supreme Court precedent.
• LaMURA v. State
  424 So. 2d 25· Fla. 4th DCA· 1982-11-10 ·cited 4×
  Florida appellate court affirmed LaMura's manslaughter conviction as an aider and abettor to a shooting death during a drug deal, finding sufficient evidence of his knowledge and participation in the crime.
• United States v. Brown
  684 F.2d 841· 11th Cir.· 1982-09-03 ·cited 4×
  The court held that the statute was not unconstitutional, the indictment was valid, the boarding and search were lawful, and the evidence was sufficient to support the conviction.
• Butts v. State
  418 So. 2d 468· Fla. 4th DCA· 1982-09-01 ·cited 4×
  Bernard Butts was convicted of aiding and abetting securities fraud in a mortgage note scheme, but the Florida District Court of Appeal reversed due to insufficient evidence linking Butts to any fraudulent misrepresentations or omissions in the actual sale of securities.
• W.J. v. State
  406 So. 2d 60· Fla. 3d DCA· 1981-11-17 ·cited 4×
• United States v. Moorman
  660 F.2d 106· 4th Cir.· 1981-09-24 ·cited 4×
  The court held that the evidence was sufficient to sustain the convictions for importation and possession with intent to distribute marijuana, and that the trial court did not err in denying motions for judgments of acquittal.
• United States v. Keenan
  657 F.2d 41· 4th Cir.· 1981-07-30 ·cited 4×
  The court held that the mailing of an invoice by Carboloy to Marathon was not sufficiently related to the scheme to defraud to support a mail fraud conviction because the scheme had already reached fruition before the mailing occurred.
• United States v. Previti
  644 F.2d 318· 4th Cir.· 1981-03-17 ·cited 4×
  The court held that the indictment sufficiently charged an offense under 18 U.S.C. § 656 by alleging willful misapplication of bank funds, complying with Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 7.
• United States v. Rubier
  651 F.2d 628· 9th Cir.· 1981-02-19 ·cited 4×
  The court denied the supplemental petition for rehearing, finding no basis for the defendant's claim of prosecutorial vouching.
• United States v. Scanlon
  640 F.2d 144· 8th Cir.· 1981-02-05 ·cited 4×
  The court held that the evidence presented at trial did not constitute an impermissible variance from the indictment, prosecutorial misconduct did not deprive the appellant of a fair trial, and the evidence was sufficient to support the conviction.
• United States v. Orlie J. Baker and W. H. Butler
  633 F.2d 696· 5th Cir.· 1980-12-29 ·cited 4×
  The court held that the evidence was sufficient to prove the bank was federally insured, the Allen charge was not coercive, and the admission of prior grand jury testimony was proper.
• L. S. v. State
  391 So. 2d 329· Fla. 3d DCA· 1980-12-16 ·cited 4×
• United States v. Jacks
  634 F.2d 390· 8th Cir.· 1980-11-10 ·cited 4×
  The court held that the appellant's inculpatory statement was voluntary and that the consent to search was validly obtained, thus affirming the conviction.
• United States v. Sizemore
  632 F.2d 8· 6th Cir.· 1980-10-09 ·cited 4×
  The court held that substantial evidence supported Elzie Sizemore's conviction for making and possessing a destructive device, but not Frank Sizemore's conviction.
• United States v. Murphy
  642 F.2d 699· 2d Cir.· 1980-08-26 ·cited 4×
  The court held that the indictment was not barred by the Speech or Debate Clause, as accepting bribes in exchange for official action falls outside its protection.
• United States v. Hartman
  627 F.2d 7· 6th Cir.· 1980-08-01 ·cited 4×
  The court held that the warrantless search of a suitcase found in a seized automobile was unconstitutional, and the evidence found therein was improperly admitted.
• United States v. Satrang
  621 F.2d 930· 8th Cir.· 1980-05-22 ·cited 4×
  The court held that the government presented sufficient evidence for a jury to infer that the transmitted communication contained a threat to injure the victim's reputation, supporting the conviction.
• United States v. Pino
  608 F.2d 1001· 4th Cir.· 1979-11-01 ·cited 4×
  The court held that the defendant's actions in attempting to facilitate a heroin transaction, even though unsuccessful in locating the drugs, constituted aiding and abetting the crime, and that the admission of evidence and procedural rulings were proper.
• United States v. Cervantes
  609 F.2d 974· 10th Cir.· 1979-10-19 ·cited 4×
  The court held that the trial court did not err in denying the motion to sever the trials of the defendants, nor was there insufficient evidence to support the wife's conviction.
• United States v. Riley Ray Fultz
  602 F.2d 830· 8th Cir.· 1979-07-31 ·cited 4×
  The court held that the indictment was sufficient and any errors in testimony or law enforcement conduct did not warrant reversal of the conviction.
• United States v. Ritchie Daryl Lavender
  602 F.2d 639· 4th Cir.· 1979-07-09 ·cited 4×
  The court held that while the convictions were supported by evidence and the defendants were properly informed of the charges, the use of state law for a federal offense necessitated vacating the sentences for resentencing.
• United States v. Marcantoni
  590 F.2d 1324· 5th Cir.· 1979-03-07 ·cited 4×
  The court held that even if evidence was admitted in violation of the Fourth Amendment, the error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt due to overwhelming independent evidence of guilt.
• United States v. Yopp
  577 F.2d 362· 6th Cir.· 1978-05-31 ·cited 4×
  The court held that the admission of evidence of other crimes or acts, without a limiting instruction to the jury, constituted reversible error when the evidence was used to prove intent or participation in the charged offense.
• United States v. Tanner
  571 F.2d 334· 5th Cir.· 1978-04-17 ·cited 4×
  The court held that the evidence presented was sufficient to prove that the prison where the offenses occurred was within the exclusive and special territorial jurisdiction of the United States.
• United States v. Holder
  566 F.2d 617· 8th Cir.· 1977-12-06 ·cited 4×
  The court held that the evidence was sufficient as a matter of law to sustain the conviction of the appellant as an aider and abettor.
• United States v. Barker
  558 F.2d 899· 8th Cir.· 1977-07-25 ·cited 4×
• United States v. Bridges
  551 F.2d 651· 5th Cir.· 1977-04-29 ·cited 4×
  The court held that the defendants were not denied a fair trial due to judicial bias, venue issues, evidentiary rulings, or cumulative errors, and that the jury's verdict was supported by the evidence.
• United States v. Cutting
  552 F.2d 761· 7th Cir.· 1977-04-04 ·cited 4×
  The court held that the arresting officer had probable cause to arrest the defendant, making the subsequent arrest and search lawful.
• United States v. Hart
  551 F.2d 738· 6th Cir.· 1977-03-31 ·cited 4×
  The court held that the evidence was sufficient to support the defendants' convictions for conspiracy and making false entries in bank records, and that the entries were indeed false as a matter of law.
• United States v. Scruggs
  549 F.2d 1097· 6th Cir.· 1977-02-22 ·cited 4×
  The court held that the jury instructions regarding "knowingly" for possession of stolen money were proper, and that the statute prohibiting obstruction of criminal investigations applied to the facts presented.
• United States v. Aulden Edward Thomas
  543 F.2d 1226· 8th Cir.· 1976-11-04 ·cited 4×
  The court held that the defendant's waiver of counsel for the lineup was knowing and intelligent, and that the jury instruction on aiding and abetting was proper. The evidence was also sufficient to support the conviction.
• United States v. Fromin
  540 F.2d 846· 6th Cir.· 1976-08-23 ·cited 4×
  The court held that grand jury witnesses, even if suspected of lying, are not entitled to Fifth Amendment warnings when indicted for perjury, and that the government had probable cause to believe Fromin was involved in criminal activity for wiretap purposes.
• State v. Combs
  330 So. 2d 560· Fla. 1st DCA· 1976-04-20 ·cited 4×
  Florida appeals the dismissal of drug trafficking charges against Combs, who allegedly arranged a meeting between a law enforcement officer and a drug seller without receiving compensation. The Supreme Court's decision in State v. Dent established that active participation in arr
• State v. Hubbard
  328 So. 2d 465· Fla. 2d DCA· 1976-03-12 ·cited 4×
  Florida appealed the dismissal of drug sale charges against Daniel Hubbard, who acted as a go-between in a controlled buy operation. The District Court of Appeal reversed the dismissal of three sale counts, holding that Hubbard's actions in arranging the transaction and quoting p
• Gibson v. State
  315 So. 2d 523· Fla. 2d DCA· 1975-07-18 ·cited 4×
  The court held that the conviction for possession of LSD in the second transaction was not supported by sufficient evidence, but the conviction for sale in the second transaction was affirmed. The court also found sentencing errors requiring remand.
• United States v. Emory Hightower
  512 F.2d 60· 5th Cir.· 1975-04-28 ·cited 4×
  The court held that while Kemp's actions constituted forcible resistance, there was insufficient evidence to prove Hightower or King aided and abetted the offense, or that Hightower committed the forcible act of cutting the tire.
• United States v. Companion
  508 F.2d 1021· 9th Cir.· 1974-09-30 ·cited 4×
  The court held that the prosecutor's closing argument comments, which suggested the appellant acted in concert with another person and potentially misled the jury, deprived the appellant of a fair trial.
• United States v. Lubomir Peichev
  500 F.2d 917· 9th Cir.· 1974-06-21 ·cited 4×
  A person is an aider and abettor if they actively assist in planning and preparing for a crime and position themselves to aid commission or escape, even if physically distant.
• United States v. Mankins
  497 F.2d 1265· 4th Cir.· 1974-06-14 ·cited 4×
  The court held that the convictions of all three defendants for bank robbery were supported by sufficient evidence and proper legal procedures, affirming the lower court's decision.
• United States v. de Lazo
  497 F.2d 1168· 3d Cir.· 1974-05-30 ·cited 4×
  The court held that there was sufficient evidence to support the jury's conviction of the defendants for conspiracy to import and distribute cocaine and possession with intent to distribute, and that the trial court's jury instructions did not constitute plain error.
• United States v. Delmar Roy Burrell
  496 F.2d 609· 3d Cir.· 1974-05-13 ·cited 4×
  The court held that the evidence was insufficient to sustain Burrell's conviction for aiding and abetting the transportation of stolen goods in interstate commerce.
• United States v. Barber
  495 F.2d 327· 9th Cir.· 1974-04-17 ·cited 4×
  The court held that the district court did not err in denying the motion to suppress radios seized under the plain view doctrine, that the jury instructions on aiding and abetting were adequate, that certain hearsay testimony was harmless error, and that coins similar to those st
• Bryan v. State
  290 So. 2d 515· Fla. 2d DCA· 1974-02-20 ·cited 4×
  Richard Henry Bryan was convicted of first-degree murder and sentenced to life imprisonment. The appellate court affirmed the conviction, finding no reversible error despite Bryan's challenge to pre-indictment identification procedures used by investigating officers.
• United States v. Zare Tirinkian
  488 F.2d 873· 2d Cir.· 1973-12-07 ·cited 4×
  The court held that the admission of testimony regarding a co-conspirator's possession of a large sum of cash was proper, and the appellant's claim regarding speedy trial rights was without merit.