12,666 Florida cases classified under this topic, plus 447 listed through its narrower topics · sorted by citation count · see the citation graph · browse and sort
-
463 F.2d 1046·
3d Cir.·
1972-06-22
·cited 30×
A county Public Defender, created under Pennsylvania statute, enjoys immunity from liability under the Civil Rights Act, even if acting under color of law.
-
Federal law enforcement officers do not have immunity from damage suits for constitutional violations if they act without good faith and probable cause.
-
461 F.2d 890·
7th Cir.·
1972-04-13
·cited 30×
The court held that the complaint stated a proper federal claim under Section 1983 for arbitrary denial of constitutional rights.
-
452 F.2d 1071·
5th Cir.·
1971-12-20
·cited 30×
Prisoners have a constitutional right of access to the courts and cannot be disciplined for attempting to exercise this right.
-
451 F.2d 1109·
1st Cir.·
1971-12-01
·cited 30×
A college may deny contract renewal to a non-tenured professor based on interpersonal difficulties and disruption of departmental harmony, provided these reasons are not trivial or factually unsupported.
-
451 F.2d 1011·
4th Cir.·
1971-11-19
·cited 30×
The court held that public employees striking are subject to discharge and are not entitled to relief for their dismissal, regardless of the strike's cause or success.
-
441 F.2d 127·
7th Cir.·
1971-04-13
·cited 30×
A judge is immune from a civil rights damage suit for actions taken within their jurisdiction, even if those actions constitute an abuse of power or are in excess of jurisdiction, as long as they are not in the clear absence of all jurisdiction.
-
439 F.2d 321·
5th Cir.·
1971-03-23
·cited 30×
The court held that the district court erred in granting summary judgment, as federal jurisdiction existed and there were disputed material facts regarding the plaintiff's discharge or resignation.
-
438 F.2d 699·
8th Cir.·
1971-03-03
·cited 30×
The court held that a federal court cannot review the grading of bar examination papers or grant injunctive relief for alleged grading errors or discrimination, as such matters must first be addressed by the state's highest court.
-
437 F.2d 352·
5th Cir.·
1971-01-05
·cited 30×
The court affirmed the dismissal, holding that federal courts should abstain from deciding a constitutional challenge to a local ordinance when state courts can resolve the underlying state law issues, and that federal courts are generally prohibited from enjoining pending state
-
421 F.2d 895·
5th Cir.·
1970-01-26
·cited 30×
The court held that the plaintiff's claims for damages were barred by the statute of limitations, as they accrued when the property was sold and leased, and the plaintiff knew of the wrong at that time.
-
420 F.2d 818·
6th Cir.·
1970-01-08
·cited 30×
A county judge presiding over a legislative/administrative Fiscal Court is not entitled to judicial immunity for actions taken outside the scope of legitimate legislative activity, even if the statute grants contempt power.
-
419 F.2d 822·
9th Cir.·
1969-12-11
·cited 30×
A prisoner's allegations of physical abuse, even if questionable, are sufficient to state a claim under the Civil Rights Act and withstand a motion to dismiss.
-
418 F.2d 226·
9th Cir.·
1969-10-28
·cited 30×
A stockholder cannot maintain a Civil Rights action in his own name for damages suffered by the corporation, even if he owns all the stock.
-
417 F.2d 388·
7th Cir.·
1969-10-03
·cited 30×
The court held that the Secretary of State's intentional and purposeful discrimination in arranging ballot order, by favoring certain candidates through a Sunday mail pickup scheme, violated the Equal Protection Clause.
-
416 F.2d 483·
9th Cir.·
1969-09-29
·cited 30×
The court held that a prisoner's complaint alleging negligent failure to protect from a fellow inmate's attack, without more, does not state a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
-
409 F.2d 1185·
8th Cir.·
1969-04-21
·cited 30×
The court held that the district court's findings that the appellant was not subjected to cruel and unusual punishment were not clearly erroneous and were supported by the evidence.
-
406 F.2d 137·
8th Cir.·
1969-01-17
·cited 30×
Public employees discharged for joining a labor union have a right of action for damages and injunctive relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, as union membership is protected by the First Amendment right of association.
-
406 F.2d 36·
9th Cir.·
1969-01-09
·cited 30×
-
405 F.2d 872·
9th Cir.·
1968-12-13
·cited 30×
-
379 F.2d 321·
6th Cir.·
1967-06-16
·cited 30×
The court held that a city annexation ordinance and its enabling state act were constitutional and that the plaintiff's claims were barred by res judicata.
-
338 F.2d 441·
9th Cir.·
1964-11-17
·cited 30×
The court held that the complaint stated a claim upon which relief could be granted, reversing the dismissal.
-
335 F.2d 1·
2d Cir.·
1964-07-21
·cited 30×
The court held that a prisoner's good-faith procedural error in filing a notice of appeal with the Court of Appeals instead of the district court, and the prisoner's transfer to another facility, do not prevent the appeal from being heard or render the claim moot, especially when
-
321 F.2d 269·
10th Cir.·
1963-08-12
·cited 30×
The court held that the trial court lacked jurisdiction to permanently enjoin the Athletic Association from enforcing its suspension of a high school for recruiting, as this dispute did not present a federal question.
-
289 F.2d 529·
7th Cir.·
1961-05-02
·cited 30×
The court held that a complaint alleging police officers beat a suspect to punish him for refusing to incriminate himself states a claim under 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983, even if the underlying conduct could also be a state tort.
-
224 F.2d 752·
4th Cir.·
1955-07-14
·cited 30×
The court held that the separate but equal doctrine of Plessy v. Ferguson is no longer valid law and that the district court has jurisdiction over actions alleging deprivation of constitutional rights under color of state law.
-
223 F.2d 782·
8th Cir.·
1955-06-28
·cited 30×
A justice of the peace is entitled to judicial immunity for acts performed in their official capacity, and the Civil Rights Act does not abrogate this immunity.
-
950 F.3d 795·
11th Cir.·
2020-02-19
·cited 29×
Florida voters approved Amendment 4 in 2018 to automatically restore voting rights to felons who completed their sentences, but Florida's legislature implemented the amendment to require payment of all fines, fees, and restitution as a condition of re-enfranchisement. The Elevent
-
920 F.2d 1554·
11th Cir.·
1991-01-15
·cited 29×
The court held that the plaintiff had no constitutionally protected property interest in a building permit for a marina, and therefore his due process claim failed. The court also found no equal protection or unconstitutional taking violations.
-
919 F.2d 1493·
11th Cir.·
1990-12-27
·cited 29×
The majority's interpretation of the statute to permit booksellers to avoid criminal penalties by using 'blinder racks' is not reasonable given the statutory language.
-
915 F.2d 572·
10th Cir.·
1990-09-17
·cited 29×
The filing of an interlocutory appeal from the denial of qualified immunity summary judgment divests the district court of jurisdiction unless the district court determines the appeal is frivolous or dilatory.
-
907 F.2d 129·
10th Cir.·
1990-06-29
·cited 29×
The court held that the plaintiff failed to demonstrate that the officer's actions constituted a violation of clearly established law, thus entitling the officer to qualified immunity.
-
895 F.2d 953·
4th Cir.·
1990-02-08
·cited 29×
The dissenting judge argues that the creche display on a public forum, with an adequate disclaimer, does not violate the Establishment Clause and that its removal is not the least restrictive means.
-
889 F.2d 159·
8th Cir.·
1989-11-07
·cited 29×
Prison officials are entitled to qualified immunity on claims of violating an inmate's right to call witnesses and receive a hearing within three working days, as these rights were not clearly established in the particularized sense required.
-
869 F.2d 1023·
7th Cir.·
1989-02-22
·cited 29×
The magistrate did not abuse his discretion in denying the motion to amend the complaint, excluding certain testimony, or denying the inmate's presence at trial, and the factual findings were not clearly erroneous.
-
867 F.2d 823·
4th Cir.·
1989-02-14
·cited 29×
Favoritism toward friends or relatives in a promotion decision, while potentially unfair, does not constitute racial discrimination under Title VII unless there is proof of intent to discriminate based on race.
-
858 F.2d 1546·
11th Cir.·
1988-11-02
·cited 29×
The court held that the professors' transfers did not violate their due process rights, and while one professor's speech addressed a matter of public concern, the university's interest in efficient administration outweighed his free speech interest.
-
855 F.2d 167·
4th Cir.·
1988-08-19
·cited 29×
The court held that a public employee's resignation is voluntary, and thus not a deprivation of property triggering due process protections, if it is not induced by employer misrepresentation or coercion, and the employee's reliance on any alleged misrepresentation is not reasona
-
842 F.2d 808·
5th Cir.·
1988-04-21
·cited 29×
The court held that the plaintiff failed to state a claim under RICO or 42 U.S.C. § 1983 because the alleged association lacked continuity for a RICO enterprise and the defendants' actions did not constitute state action for the § 1983 claim.
-
838 F.2d 375·
9th Cir.·
1988-02-02
·cited 29×
A landowner's challenge to the constitutionality of a land use ordinance as applied to their property is not ripe for judicial adjudication until they have sought and obtained a final decision from the relevant administrative body, such as a variance or special use permit.
-
821 F.2d 111·
2d Cir.·
1987-06-08
·cited 29×
The court held that the plaintiff failed to establish a genuine issue of material fact regarding retaliatory discharge, as the employer demonstrated legitimate, non-discriminatory reasons for the termination supported by convincing evidence.
-
817 F.2d 737·
11th Cir.·
1987-05-27
·cited 29×
The court holds that the plaintiff's claims are barred by absolute judicial and prosecutorial immunity and that the remaining allegations are conclusory, failing to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.
-
811 F.2d 1025·
7th Cir.·
1987-01-29
·cited 29×
The court held that summary judgment was improperly granted on the issue of probable cause, but properly granted on the issue of exigent circumstances.
-
804 F.2d 93·
7th Cir.·
1986-10-24
·cited 29×
The court held that the district court did not abuse its discretion in awarding attorney's fees, finding the hourly rate and reduced hours to be reasonable given the evidence presented.
-
797 F.2d 1555·
11th Cir.·
1986-09-03
·cited 29×
The court held that the plaintiff failed to raise genuine issues of material fact regarding his procedural due process, substantive due process, and First Amendment claims, and that the supervisor had absolute immunity for defamation. The court also found the district court's all
-
798 F.2d 1168·
8th Cir.·
1986-08-19
·cited 29×
The dissenting judge argues that the evidence was insufficient to support findings of municipal liability and a First Amendment violation, and that a new trial on damages is warranted due to an improper jury instruction.
-
781 F.2d 218·
D.C. Cir.·
1986-01-17
·cited 29×
WMATA's sovereign immunity, conferred by its signatories and Congress, prevents liability for torts committed in the performance of governmental functions, including the operation of its police force.
-
778 F.2d 1386·
9th Cir.·
1985-12-17
·cited 29×
State officials are immune from damage suits for actions taken regarding foster parents' religious exercise of discipline if the constitutional rights were not clearly established at the time of the conduct.
-
764 F.2d 381·
5th Cir.·
1985-07-01
·cited 29×
The court held that Auster's original complaint stated a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for violation of Fourth Amendment rights and that the district court should have allowed Auster to amend its complaint.
-
763 F.2d 1212·
11th Cir.·
1985-06-21
·cited 29×
The court held that Section 29-100(b)(2) of the Gainesville Sign Ordinance is facially unconstitutional due to overbreadth and vagueness, and that the petitioner has standing to challenge it.