3,807 Florida cases classified under this topic, plus 3,026 listed through its narrower topics · sorted by citation count · see the citation graph · browse and sort
-
The appeal from the civil rights action dismissal is dismissed as untimely, and the dismissal of the habeas corpus petition is affirmed.
-
909 F.2d 1316·
9th Cir.·
1990-07-26
·cited 2×
The court held that actual, uninterrupted incarceration is the touchstone for determining disability by incarceration under Washington's tolling provision, allowing the statute of limitations to be tolled.
-
The court held that it lacked jurisdiction over the Johnmeyer appeal due to a failure to file a separate notice of appeal, and affirmed the dismissal of the Mitchell case as moot.
-
908 F.2d 267·
8th Cir.·
1990-07-05
·cited 2×
The court should affirm the stay and allow the district court to consider remaining issues after state exhaustion.
-
The court held that the district court erred in sua sponte dismissing the pro se complaint as frivolous because the plaintiff stated a colorable claim of due process violation.
-
905 F.2d 1188·
8th Cir.·
1990-06-14
·cited 2×
The court held that the district court erred in granting summary judgment for the defendants on the conspiracy/retaliation claim and the unlawful arrest claims, and that the plaintiff is entitled to nominal damages.
-
902 F.2d 822·
11th Cir.·
1990-06-04
·cited 2×
Government officials are entitled to qualified immunity if their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights. A single intermediate appellate court decision construing a statute is insufficient to establish clarity for qualified immunity purpos
-
The court held that the district court did not err in granting summary judgment, as the plaintiff's claim was barred by the statute of limitations and no liberty interest in parole was established by the cited statutes or regulations.
-
The court held that the Supreme Court's decision in Owens v. Okure should be applied to the plaintiff's case, even if viewed as a retroactivity issue, because no inequity resulted from its application.
-
901 F.2d 1439·
7th Cir.·
1990-05-14
·cited 2×
The court held that the plaintiff failed to present sufficient evidence to establish a Monell claim for deliberate indifference to training or inadequate investigation, and that his other claims were procedurally barred or without merit.
-
The court affirmed the district court's judgment, holding that the plaintiff failed to demonstrate sufficient prejudice from defense counsel's improper remarks or other alleged errors to warrant a new trial.
-
The court reserved judgment on the City's liability for the city manager's actions pending a determination of damages, remanding for that purpose.
-
The court held that striking the City's answer and entering a default judgment for discovery abuse was an abuse of discretion, as the misconduct did not rise to the level of bad faith or willful abuse required for such a severe sanction.
-
The court affirmed the district court's imposition of Rule 11 sanctions against an attorney for filing a complaint without reasonable inquiry into its factual and legal basis.
-
The dissenting judge believes the district court properly applied issue preclusion, barring the appellant from relitigating claims already rejected by the state court.
-
The court held that while the district court erred in dismissing the case as moot, the plaintiffs' claims were ultimately barred by Title VII's Section 703(h) protection for bona fide seniority systems, even when brought under §§ 1981 and 1983.
-
A federal court must have a substantial federal question to exercise pendent jurisdiction over state law claims; otherwise, the complaint should be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
-
734 F. Supp. 997·
S.D. Fla.·
1990-03-30
·cited 2×
The court held that plaintiff has standing to sue for nominal damages and that defendants, sued in their official capacities, are not 'persons' under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, but can be sued individually if they violated clearly established constitutional rights.
-
901 F.2d 96·
8th Cir.·
1990-03-05
·cited 2×
The court held that a claim attacking the fact or length of confinement requires exhaustion of state remedies before federal court intervention.
-
The court held that a jury could reasonably find that the search exceeded the warrant's scope and that the prosecutor may not be entitled to absolute immunity if investigating crimes beyond the indictment.
-
The court held that while the state violated the EAHCA by failing to adequately fund education for handicapped children, the district court's specific relief order was too prescriptive. The court also found that exhaustion of administrative remedies was not required due to futili
-
The court held that the defendants did not deprive the plaintiff of any protected interest, and therefore, no due process violation occurred.
-
The court held that venue was proper under 28 U.S.C. § 1392(a) when defendants reside in different districts within the same state, and the district court erred in dismissing the action sua sponte.
-
892 F.2d 20·
2d Cir.·
1989-12-12
·cited 2×
The court held that the district court erred in dismissing a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim alleging an illegal search and seizure violating the Fourth Amendment, but affirmed the dismissal of all other claims.
-
The court held that a difference of medical opinion regarding treatment does not constitute deliberate indifference to serious medical needs, and affirmed the grant of summary judgment.
-
The court affirmed the lower court's decision, finding no direct evidence or reasonable inference of a conspiracy by the private citizen defendant.
-
889 F.2d 906·
9th Cir.·
1989-11-16
·cited 2×
The statute of limitations for a section 1983 claim against peace officers is tolled by a state statute that prevents civil actions while criminal charges are pending against the plaintiff, as the tolling provision is consistent with federal law.
-
723 F. Supp. 1494·
S.D. Fla.·
1989-10-31
·cited 2×
The court held that plaintiffs' counsel failed to conduct a reasonable prefiling inquiry for Section 1983 and negligence claims against the City, Say, and Martinez, warranting Rule 11 sanctions.
-
894 F.2d 961·
8th Cir.·
1989-10-31
·cited 2×
A Missouri Department of Corrections Rule creates a liberty interest protected by the Fourteenth Amendment, requiring procedural due process for denial of visitation.
-
888 F.2d 548·
8th Cir.·
1989-10-19
·cited 2×
The court held that even if a statute creates a liberty interest in a timely hearing, sufficient evidence supported the jury's finding that the inmate received a hearing within the statutory period, and prior convictions were admissible for impeachment.
-
887 F.2d 1455·
11th Cir.·
1989-10-13
·cited 2×
The court held that the plaintiffs failed to establish state action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 because the litigation had not resulted in an immediately enforceable state court judgment, and private parties invoking state procedures are not state actors without more.
-
The Fifth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal for lack of jurisdiction under the Rooker-Feldman doctrine and upheld the imposition of Rule 11 sanctions.
-
The dissenting judge argues that the majority's decision to allow bridge tolls to subsidize PATH deficits conflicts with prior precedent and is unfair to bridge users.
-
The court held that the defendants were protected by qualified immunity on the civil rights claim and by state statute immunity on the state law negligence claim.
-
The court held that the district court erred in dismissing the section 1983 claims, as the social worker's actions in investigating child abuse and maintaining a name on the central registry were investigatory or administrative, not prosecutorial, and thus not entitled to absolut
-
883 F.2d 400·
5th Cir.·
1989-09-19
·cited 2×
The court held that probable cause existed to arrest Ms. Bennett, and even if it did not exist for Mr. Bennett, the officers and cities were immune from suit. Therefore, the district court's judgment was affirmed.
-
884 F.2d 943·
6th Cir.·
1989-09-18
·cited 2×
The court held that the foster parents' relationship with the child did not constitute a constitutionally protected liberty interest, and thus they failed to state a claim under § 1983.
-
The court held that a federal habeas petition must be dismissed if it contains any unexhausted claims, and that local legislators, city attorneys, and judges are shielded by absolute immunity for actions taken within their official capacities.
-
884 F.2d 160·
4th Cir.·
1989-09-08
·cited 2×
A claim of federal preemption under the Supremacy Clause is not actionable under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and therefore cannot support a claim for attorney's fees under 42 U.S.C. § 1988.
-
A fired municipal police officer appealed a trial court order dismissing his § 1983 civil rights action on sovereign immunity grounds. The appellate court reversed, holding that state courts have subject matter jurisdiction over § 1983 actions against municipalities.
-
The court held that a plaintiff must allege exhaustion of administrative remedies to state a claim under the whistle-blower statute and that at-will employees lack a property interest in continued employment for constitutional claims, but a First Amendment retaliation claim may p
-
881 F.2d 1032·
11th Cir.·
1989-08-24
·cited 2×
A prisoner's equal protection challenge to parole procedures, alleging racial and economic discrimination, can be brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 without exhausting state remedies, but claims seeking release or damages for parole denial must be brought as habeas corpus petitions r
-
880 F.2d 845·
5th Cir.·
1989-08-18
·cited 2×
A prisoner does not have a vested right to use funds in his savings account beyond what state law permits.
-
The denial of a rezoning application is constitutional if rationally related to legitimate government interests, even if influenced by neighborhood opposition.
-
The court held that genuine issues of material fact precluded summary judgment on the federal § 1983 claims and that the plaintiff had stated viable state law claims for negligent and intentional infliction of emotional distress and under the Texas Tort Claims Act.
-
881 F.2d 242·
6th Cir.·
1989-07-27
·cited 2×
The court held that the plaintiffs lacked standing because the relief sought would not redress their alleged injury, as the school district could continue to implement a policy that resulted in the same harm.
-
876 F.2d 437·
5th Cir.·
1989-06-29
·cited 2×
A municipality cannot be held liable under section 1983 for an employee's failure to properly exercise discretion granted by policy.
-
The court held that there are genuine issues of material fact regarding whether the plaintiff received constitutionally protected due process rights and that the First Amendment claim requires further factual development.
-
877 F.2d 219·
2d Cir.·
1989-06-19
·cited 2×
The court held that the appellant waived his right to a jury trial by failing to properly serve a jury demand and affirmed the district court's dismissal.
-
The court held that the jury instructions on the reasonableness of deadly force and the burden of proof for self-defense were not erroneous.