3,807 Florida cases classified under this topic, plus 3,026 listed through its narrower topics · sorted by citation count · see the citation graph · browse and sort
-
826 F.2d 160·
1st Cir.·
1987-08-18
·cited 6×
The court held that the district court erred in granting a preliminary injunction because the plaintiff failed to demonstrate a sufficient likelihood of success on the merits and the harm to the university outweighed the harm to the plaintiff.
-
The court held that the Medical Staff Administrative Committee's (MSAC) consideration of charges previously addressed in disciplinary proceedings was not barred by administrative res judicata, and that the MSAC hearing did not violate plaintiff's procedural due process rights.
-
825 F.2d 642·
2d Cir.·
1987-07-29
·cited 6×
The court held that an inmate's transfer from voluntary protective custody to a diagnostic and treatment program (APPU) does not implicate a liberty interest protected by due process, as New York statutes and regulations do not create such an entitlement.
-
821 F.2d 1120·
5th Cir.·
1987-07-17
·cited 6×
The court held that the inmate's pro se complaint sufficiently stated claims for relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and that these claims were not barred by the requirement to exhaust state remedies via habeas corpus.
-
822 F.2d 812·
8th Cir.·
1987-07-08
·cited 6×
The court held that a prison appeals board's impartiality can cure any bias at the initial disciplinary hearing level.
-
822 F.2d 324·
2d Cir.·
1987-07-02
·cited 6×
A municipal attorney acting in a prosecutorial capacity is absolutely immune from liability for actions taken within the scope of that role, even if those actions involve misconduct or conflicts of interest, provided they are not taken in the clear absence of all jurisdiction. Fu
-
821 F.2d 980·
4th Cir.·
1987-06-24
·cited 6×
The court held that 42 U.S.C. § 422 does not create an enforceable right or entitlement to vocational rehabilitation services, and thus cannot form the basis for a § 1983 claim.
-
The court held that the evidence supported the jury's finding that the District Attorney's office's failure to have a procedure for canceling material witness warrants constituted a custom or policy that violated the plaintiff's constitutional rights, and that the jury's damage a
-
The court held that the inmate failed to prove an Eighth Amendment violation because the injury was accidental and the emotional harm was de minimis.
-
817 F.2d 465·
8th Cir.·
1987-05-01
·cited 6×
The court held that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying a new trial, as the verdict was not against the manifest weight of the evidence and any error in admitting evidence of a prior fight was harmless.
-
818 F.2d 210·
2d Cir.·
1987-04-21
·cited 6×
The court affirmed the dismissal of Dr. Hogan's case for discovery abuse and affirmed summary judgments for the Hawaiian plaintiffs' personal injury claims, but remanded Mrs. Fraticelli's wrongful death claim against chemical companies and vacated her claim against the U.S.
-
816 F.2d 258·
6th Cir.·
1987-04-20
·cited 6×
The court held that the plaintiffs failed to state a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 because the NCAA's interpretation of its eligibility rules did not infringe constitutional rights and the NCAA did not act under color of state law.
-
The court held that a district court erred in dismissing an inmate's civil rights suit for failure to exhaust administrative remedies without considering whether the inmate made a good faith attempt to do so.
-
813 F.2d 1387·
9th Cir.·
1987-04-02
·cited 6×
Local rent control ordinances are preempted by federal law when applied to a mobile home park operated by a non-Indian entity on Indian trust lands, due to the comprehensive federal regulatory scheme governing such leases.
-
The court should not have overruled the district court's decision regarding probable cause for arrest.
-
The court held that Illinois' blanket denial of bail to arrested parole violators pending their final revocation hearing likely violates the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
-
810 F.2d 791·
8th Cir.·
1987-02-02
·cited 6×
The court held that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying a default judgment, limiting voir dire, or directing a verdict for the city, and that any error in jury instructions was harmless.
-
808 F.2d 1307·
8th Cir.·
1987-01-26
·cited 6×
Unreviewed administrative proceedings do not preclude Title VII claims, but may preclude § 1983 claims if the agency acted in a judicial capacity. The court remanded for further proceedings on jurisdictional issues.
-
806 F.2d 1273·
5th Cir.·
1987-01-06
·cited 6×
The court held that the appellants' cause of action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 was time-barred by the applicable state statute of limitations.
-
808 F.2d 601·
7th Cir.·
1986-12-19
·cited 6×
The court should abstain from deciding the constitutional issue to allow Illinois courts to interpret the state statute, which could resolve the case without constitutional adjudication.
-
The court held that the jury verdicts were inconsistent and that the evidence supported a finding for the plaintiff on both federal excessive force and state assault and battery claims, requiring a new trial.
-
804 F.2d 493·
8th Cir.·
1986-11-04
·cited 6×
A state court judge is entitled to absolute immunity from civil damages actions for judicial acts performed within their jurisdiction, even if those acts are later found to be erroneous or in excess of jurisdiction.
-
The appeal of the denial of a preliminary injunction is dismissed as moot because the challenged ordinance was amended during the pendency of the appeal.
-
804 F.2d 20·
2d Cir.·
1986-10-23
·cited 6×
The court held that the appellants' constitutional claims regarding TLC's administration of limousine licensing requirements were without merit and affirmed the district court's grant of summary judgment.
-
A waiver of a section 1983 claim is valid if voluntary, deliberate, and informed; here, the settlement agreement was entered into voluntarily despite allegations of duress and coercion.
-
793 F.2d 737·
5th Cir.·
1986-07-11
·cited 6×
The court held that Angel's complaint failed to state a cause of action under section 1983 because it did not allege a constitutional violation resulting from the city's failure to train election officials or from the allowance of non-resident votes.
-
796 F.2d 230·
8th Cir.·
1986-07-07
·cited 6×
The court held that the teachers' claim, based on the failure to receive notice of nonrenewal under the Arkansas Teacher Fair Dismissal Act, did not allege deprivation of a constitutionally protected property interest actionable under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
-
The court should not have dismissed the case for failure to state a claim, as the plaintiff's allegations of gross negligence could constitute deliberate indifference.
-
790 F.2d 265·
2d Cir.·
1986-05-14
·cited 6×
The dissent argues that New York res judicata law does not preclude the plaintiff's section 1983 claim, and that the majority erred in considering the good-faith immunity defense.
-
789 F.2d 334·
5th Cir.·
1986-05-12
·cited 6×
The court held that federal courts lack subject matter jurisdiction over challenges to state court decisions in particular cases, even if alleging unconstitutionality, but do have jurisdiction over general challenges to state bar rules. The court affirmed the district court's gra
-
The court held that the temporary suspension of a warehouse license, followed by a prompt post-deprivation hearing and other procedural safeguards, satisfied the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
-
The court held that while implicit exhaustion requirements can exist for § 1983 claims, the Medicaid Act does not contain such a requirement, and exhaustion of state judicial remedies is generally not required.
-
787 F.2d 1245·
8th Cir.·
1986-04-02
·cited 6×
The court held that the plaintiff's First Amendment rights were violated by his termination, entitling him to equitable relief, but reversed the denial of prospective relief.
-
A prior state unemployment insurance determination that an employee was terminated for misconduct does not collaterally estop the employee from pursuing a federal discrimination claim if the discrimination issue was not fully litigated in the prior proceeding.
-
The court should dismiss the action for want of a case or controversy under Article III of the Constitution.
-
783 F.2d 98·
7th Cir.·
1986-02-11
·cited 6×
Public employees with statutory tenure have a property interest in their jobs, entitling them to due process protections, including a hearing, before termination, even if the employer claims reorganization, unless the reorganization is actual and not pretextual.
-
782 F.2d 825·
9th Cir.·
1986-02-11
·cited 6×
Parratt v. Taylor does not bar Section 1983 claims alleging direct violations of Fourth Amendment rights, even if adequate state remedies exist. However, it may bar due process claims arising from random, unauthorized deprivations if adequate post-deprivation remedies are availab
-
A guardian ad litem is not acting under color of state law for purposes of 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and a parent cannot represent minor children in federal court if the parent is not an attorney.
-
779 F.2d 1187·
6th Cir.·
1986-01-06
·cited 6×
The court held that the ordinance's absolute prohibition of radio antennas, while permitting television antennas, is arbitrary, capricious, and violates equal protection.
-
The court held that a plaintiff can be a prevailing party under 42 U.S.C. § 1988 even without formal monetary or injunctive relief, if their lawsuit vindicates constitutional rights or acts as a catalyst for positive change.
-
The court held that the district court did not err in dismissing the pro se § 1983 suit as frivolous and in awarding attorneys' fees to the defendants.
-
Summary judgment was improperly granted because the plaintiff's pro se allegations, including those in his affidavit, raised genuine issues of material fact regarding whether his segregation constituted unconstitutional punishment.
-
The court held that a prisoner's due process rights are not violated by a state's administrative calculation of parole eligibility based on prior convictions, as long as a procedural avenue exists for the prisoner to challenge the accuracy of those convictions.
-
The court held that principles of issue preclusion, derived from the prior state court judgment, required dismissal of the appellant's federal civil rights action.
-
773 F.2d 101·
6th Cir.·
1985-09-20
·cited 6×
The court held that the district court correctly granted summary judgment because the officer's actions, though resulting in injury, did not constitute a deprivation of constitutional rights under § 1983, especially given the availability of state remedies.
-
773 F.2d 834·
7th Cir.·
1985-09-18
·cited 6×
The court held that the trial court erred in entering judgment notwithstanding the verdict on damages, as there was sufficient evidence to support the jury's award.
-
773 F.2d 10·
1st Cir.·
1985-09-13
·cited 6×
The court held that the defendants' affidavits were insufficient to establish the absence of a genuine issue of material fact, and thus summary judgment was not warranted.
-
769 F.2d 1360·
9th Cir.·
1985-08-27
·cited 6×
Judicial and prosecutorial immunity do not shield officials from claims of conspiracy to deprive constitutional rights, and a prisoner is entitled to amend a complaint alleging such conspiracy before discovery.
-
768 F.2d 270·
8th Cir.·
1985-07-18
·cited 6×
The court held that inmates do not possess a constitutionally protected liberty interest in contact visitation and that the prison's no-contact visitation policy, based on drug possession, is reasonably related to legitimate penological interests. The court also affirmed the magi
-
The court held that the executive secretary of the Board on Judicial Standards was entitled to qualified immunity because the plaintiff's allegations did not establish a violation of clearly established constitutional rights to privacy.