DALE OAKLEY, ROBERT L. CORCORAN, LEONARD CORCORAN AND VIVIAN CORCORAN, APPELLANTS,
v.
E. L. BALL, HERBERT RINGE AND NEWPORT JENSEN DEVELOPMENT, INC., APPELLEES
PER CURIAM.
Our review of the briefs and appendix leads us to the conclusion that appellants have failed to demonstrate an abuse of discretion by the trial court. Accordingly, the order appealed from is
AFFIRMED.
MAGER, C. J., and DOWNEY and DAUKSCH, JJ., concur.
On petition for rehearing appellants take an entirely new tack and suggest reversal of the order appealed from because although a hearing was held below on appel-lees’ motion to discharge the lis pendens no evidence was adduced. This is an entirely new contention not raised in appellants brief. This is the first notice to this court that appellants assert they were aggrieved by some procedural deficiency in the trial court and it comes too late. Fla.App. Rule 3.14(b); In re Certificate of N.Y. to Compel Atten. of Wit., 297 So. 2d 865 (Fla.4th DCA 1974). Accordingly, appellants petition for rehearing is DENIED.
ALDERMAN, C. J., and DOWNEY and DAUKSCH, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- In re Certificate of New York to Compel Attendance of Witness, 297 So. 2d 865 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974)