JOHN M. NAPOLI, BY AND THROUGH HIS UNDERSIGNED ATTORNEYS AS AGENTS FOR UNITED BONDING INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLANTS,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
JOHN M. NAPOLI, BY AND THROUGH HIS UNDERSIGNED ATTORNEYS AS AGENTS FOR UNITED BONDING INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLANTS,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
248 So. 2d 502
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1971)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion of the Court
This cause involves the same basic factual issues as outlined in this Court’s opinion in United Bonding Insurance Company v. State, 242 So.2d 140 (Fla.App. 1st 1970), wherein we reversed and remanded that cause to the trial court for further proceedings.
A distinguishing question raised in the instant appeal is that appellant, John M. Napoli, has not demonstrated any interest in the subject matter or that he is a legal representative for United Bonding Insurance Company. Without passing upon the status of appellant, Napoli, we remand the cause to the trial court for further proceedings in accordance with the opinion rendered in United Bonding Insurance Company v. State, supra.
Reversed and remanded.
JOHNSON, C. J., and SPECTOR, J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Owens v. State, 253 So. 2d 471 (Fla. 1st DCA 1971)…plea without making a complete inquiry as to whether he knowingly and intelligently waived all the constitutional rights involved. We have carefully examined the transcript herein and find this point to be substantially without merit. Dill v. State, 248 So. 2d 502 (Fla.App. 1st, 1971). Appellant next contends that the sentence of five years plus 91 days in default of payment of costs was in excess of the maximum imprisonment allowed by law inasmuch as appellant was adjudged insolvent. With this contention, w…
-
Lurea Clark v. State, 317 So. 2d 870 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975)…record that there was an adequate waiver by appellant of the previously enumerated constitutional rights. See Kelly v. State, Fla.App. (1st), 254 So. 2d 22 (1971); Hall v. State, Fla. App. (4th), 273 So. 2d 90 (1973); Dill v. State, Fla.App. (1st), 248 So. 2d 502 (1971); People v. Ferguson, 383 Mich. 645, 178 N.W. 2d 490; and Ford v. State, Fla.App. (1st), 317 So. 2d 473. Opinion filed August 12, 1975. Affirmed. RAWLS, Acting C. J., and MILLS, J., concur.…
-
Hall v. State, 273 So. 2d 90 (Fla. 4th DCA 1973)…L.Ed.2d 541; Steinhauser v. State, Fla.App.1969, 228 So. 2d 446; O’Fallon v. State, Fla.App.1970, 239 So. 2d 872; Kelly v. State, Fla.App.1971, 254 So. 2d 22; People v. Sepulvado, 1970, 27 Mich.App. 66, 183 N.W. 2d 327; Dill v. State, Fla.App.1971, 248 So. 2d 502. Compare with Clark v. State, Fla.App.1972, 256 So. 2d 551; Young v. State, Fla.App.1970, 233 So. 2d 178; Johnson v. Wainwright, Fla.1970, 238 So. 2d 590. A reading of Boykin v. Alabama, supra, 395 U.S. 238, 89 S.Ct. 1709, 23 L.Ed.2d 274, indicates…
Authorities Cited
- United Bonding Ins. Co. v. State, 242 So. 2d 140 (Fla. 1st DCA 1970)