WILLIE SETTLE, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 1969-05-14
No. 68-350
LILES, C. J., and PIERCE and McNULTY, JJ., concur.
223 So. 2d 385 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1969) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

*386PER CURIAM.

We reject appellant’s contention that he was wrongfully denied a direct appeal on authority of Barnett v. State, 222 So.2d 29 (2d D.C.A.Fla.), opinion filed April 25, 1969. All other points raised by appellant are without merit.

Affirmed.

LILES, C. J., and PIERCE and McNULTY, JJ., concur.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Settle v. State, 240 So. 2d 328 (Fla. 2d DCA 1970)
    …PER CURIAM. This is the second time this case has been before this court on the same assignment of error. Settle v. State, Fla.App.1969, 223 So. 2d 385. In this appeal the public defender has filed an “Anders” brief,1 and asks permission to withdraw as counsel. We see no reason for the procedure set out in Leone v. State2 to be followed. Therefore, the order appealed from is affirmed and the public…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw