TORNADO SOUTHERN, INC., APPELLANT,
v.
HARRY'S AUTO PARTS, INC., APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Tornado Southern purchased an account receivable from a bankruptcy trustee and sued to collect on it, but the lower court dismissed the action because the original debtor was a foreign corporation that failed to qualify to do business in Florida. The appellate court reversed, holding that Florida's foreign corporation qualification statute does not bar suits by trustees in bankruptcy or their vendees.
The court held that Florida's foreign corporation qualification statute does not apply to trustees in bankruptcy or their vendees. Although the statute's language includes "successors or assigns," it was intended as a penalty against foreign corporations doing business without compliance, and does not extend to trustees in bankruptcy under federal law, who acquire title by operation of law.
“The purpose and intent of the statute is penal in nature directed against foreign corporations doing business in this state without complying with the state law and the clause "or its successors or assigns" was to prevent an evasion of the statute by subterfuge, but such statute has no application to trustees in bankruptcy under the federal law.”
Establishes the statutory purpose and the key holding that bankruptcy trustees are not subject to the foreign corporation qualification requirement
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceTornado Southern purchased a chose-in-action (account receivable) from J. Sam Plowden, the trustee in bankruptcy for Transcontinental Industries, Inc.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Foreign Corporation Qualification Statutes cases and more on FLexlaw
The appellant-plaintiff, a purchaser of the chose-in-action sued on from the trustee in bankruptcy, brought suit in assumpsit against the appellee-debtor-defendant on the chose-in-action of the bankrupt, Transcontinental Industries, Inc.; the chose-inaction was purchased from the Trustee in Bankruptcy, J. Sam Plowden, as owner of the account Transcontinental, Inc., as Trustee in Bankruptcy, in the United States District Court, Northern District of Georgia, Atlanta Division.
The purchaser of the account brought suit against the debtor and the lower court sustained the defendant’s motion to dismiss the action because the bankrupt was a foreign corporation, and the accounts receivable sued on was the result of it doing business in Florida, without qualifying to do business in this state as required by Chapter 613, F.S.1967, F.S.A. From a judgment of dismissal for such failure, the plaintiff appealed. We reverse.
Section 613.04, F.S.1967, F.S.A., provides :
“613.04 Cannot maintain action until provisions complied with. — The failure of any such foreign corporation to comply with the provisions of this chapter shall not affect the validity of any contract with such foreign corporation, but no action shall be maintained or recovery had in any of the courts of this state by any such corporation, or its successors or assigns, so long as such foreign corporation fails to comply with the provisions of this chapter.”
The purpose and intent of the statute is penal in nature directed against foreign corporations doing business in this state without complying with the state law and the clause “or its successors or assigns” was to prevent an evasion of the statute by subterfuge, but such statute has no application to trustees in bankruptcy under the federal law. A trustee in bankruptcy under federal law acquires title to the bankrupt’s *30estate by operation of law and the language of the state statute “or its successors or assigns” is not comprehensive of trustees in bankruptcy in the federal system or vendees claiming title through such a trustee. Cf. Head v. Brainard, 9 Cir. 1925, 5 F.2d 289.
The judgment appealed from is
Reversed.
CROSS and McCAIN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Settle v. State, 223 So. 2d 385 (Fla. 2d DCA 1969)…[*386] PER CURIAM. We reject appellant’s contention that he was wrongfully denied a direct appeal on authority of Barnett v. State, 222 So. 2d 29 (2d D.C.A.Fla.), opinion filed April 25, 1969. All other points raised by appellant are without merit. Affirmed. LILES, C. J., and PIERCE and McNULTY, JJ., concur.…
Authorities Cited
- Head v. Brainard, 5 F.2d 289 (9th Cir. 1925)