AGRICULTURAL PRORATE COMMISSION OF CALIFORNIA ET AL.
v.
MUTUAL ORANGE DISTRIBUTORS ET AL.
AGRICULTURAL PRORATE COMMISSION OF CALIFORNIA ET AL.
MUTUAL ORANGE DISTRIBUTORS ET AL.
318 U.S. 744
Supreme Court of the United States (1943)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Per_curiam
Per Curiam:
The motion to vacate the judgment is granted. The judgment of the District Court is vacated, without costs to either party in this Court, and the cause is remanded to the District Court with directions to dismiss the bill of complaint as moot. United States v. Hamburg-American Co., 239 U. S. 466, 477-8; Brownlow v. Schwartz, 261 U. S. 216; Paramount Pictures v. Langer, 306 U. S. 619; Retail Food Clerks & Managers Union v. Union Premier Food Stores, 308 U. S. 526.
Messrs. Earl Warren, Attorney General of California, and Walter L. Bowers, Deputy Attorney General, for appellants. Mr. Guy Richards Crump for appellees.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Loper v. Beto, 440 F.2d 934 (5th Cir. 1971)…35) ; Burns v. United States, 287 U.S. 216, 53 S.Ct. 154, 77 L.Ed. 266 (1932) ; Hiatt v. Compagna, 178 F. 2d 42 (5th Cir. 1949) aff’d, 340 U.S. 880, 71 S.Ct. 192, 95 L.Ed. 639 (1950) ; Goldsmith v. Sanford, 132 F. 2d 126 (5th Cir. 1942) cert. denied 318 U.S. 744, 63 S.Ct. 827, 87 L.Ed. 1122; Hamrick v. Boles, 231 F.Supp. 507 (N.D.W.Va. 1964) ; there exists critical commentary which would require the application of due process in the granting and revocation of parole. The following articles, notes and commen…
Authorities Cited
- United States v. Hamburg-Amerikanische Packetfahrt-Actien Gesellschaft, 239 U.S. 466 (U.S. 1916)
- Brownlow v. Schwartz, 261 U.S. 216 (U.S. 1923)
- Oklahoma ex rel. Williamson v. Woodring, 308 U.S. 526 (U.S. 1939)
- Retail Food Clerks & Managers Union v. Union Premier Food Stores, Inc., 308 U.S. 526 (U.S. 1940)
- Paramount Pictures, Inc. v. Langer, 306 U.S. 619 (U.S. 1939)
- Harris v. Nat'l Mediation Bd., 306 U.S. 619 (U.S. 1939)