PARAMOUNT PICTURES, INC., ET AL.
v.
LANGER, GOVERNOR, ET AL.; AND SAME V. STRUTZ, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ET AL.

U.S. | 1939-03-27
Nos. 567; No. 568
306 U.S. 619 Supreme Court of the United States (1939) Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam:

Per Curiam:

The motion to reverse is granted. The judgment of the specially constituted District Court is reversed, without costs to either party in this Court, and the cause is remanded to the specially constituted District Court with directions to dismiss the proceeding on the ground that the cause has become moot, without prejudice to an application by either party to the specially cohstituted District Court for an' award of costs in that court. United States v. Hamburg-American Co., 239 U. S. 466, 477-478; Heitmuller v. Stokes, 256 U. S. 359, 362-363; Brownlow v. Schwartz, 261 U. S. 216, 218.

Reported below: 23 F. Supp. 890.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Exxon Corp. v. Governor OF Maryland, 437 U.S. 117 (U.S. 1978)
    …n both federal and state statutes. To date, the courts have had little difficulty sustaining suoh statutes against a substantive due process attack. See, e. g., Paramount Pictures, [*125] Inc. v. Longer, 23 F. Supp. 890 (ND 1938), dismissed as moot, 306 U. S. 619; see generally Comment, Gasoline Marketing Practices and “Meeting Competition” under the Robinson-Patman Act, 37 Md. L. Rev. 323, 329 n. 44 (1977). Brief for Appellants in No. 77-10, p. 27. For instance, as of July 1, 1974, such interstate, nonref…
  • William v. Boggess, 233 F.2d 389 (9th Cir. 1956)
    …v. Schwartz, 1923, 261 U.S. 216, 217-219, 43 S.Ct. 263, 67 L.Ed. 620, and the many cases there cited; Woodring v. Clarksburg-Columbus Short Route Bridge Co., 1937, 302 U.S. 658, 58 S.Ct. 365, 82 L.Ed. 509; Paramount Pictures, Inc., v. Langer, 1939, 306 U.S. 619, 59 S.Ct. 641, 83 L.Ed. 1025; Retail Food Clerks & Managers Union, Local No. 1357 v. Union Premier Food Stores, Inc., 1940, 308 U.S. 526, 60 S.Ct. 376, 84 L.Ed. 445.…
  • Agric. Prorate Comm'n of Cal. v. Mut. Orange Distribs., 318 U.S. 744 (U.S. 1943)
    …in this Court, and the cause is remanded to the District Court with directions to dismiss the bill of complaint as moot. United States v. Hamburg-American Co., 239 U. S. 466, 477-8; Brownlow v. Schwartz, 261 U. S. 216; Paramount Pictures v. Langer, 306 U. S. 619; Retail Food Clerks & Managers Union v. Union [*745] Premier Food Stores, 308 U. S. 526. Messrs. Earl Warren, Attorney General of California, and Walter L. Bowers, Deputy Attorney General, for appellants. Mr. Guy Richards Crump for appellees.…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw