SOUTH BEND
v.
DEHAVEN, TREASURER, ET AL.
SOUTH BEND
DEHAVEN, TREASURER, ET AL.
302 U.S. 644
Supreme Court of the United States (1937)
Positive Treatment
Per_curiam
Appeal from the Supreme Court of Indiana.
Per Curiam:
The motion of the appellees to dismiss the appeal is granted and the appeal is dismissed for the want of a properly presented substantial federal question. (1) Citizens’ Savings Bank v. Owensboro, 173 U. S. 636, 643; Cleveland & Pittsburgh R. Co. v. Cleveland, 235 U. S. 50, 53; White River Co. v. Arkansas, 279 U. S. 692, 700; Collins v. Streitz, 298 U. S. 640. (2) Pawhuska v. Pawhuska Oil & Gas Co., 250 U. S. 394; Trenton v. New Jersey, 262 U. S. 182; City of Holton v. Kansas State Bank, 300 U. S. 641.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- City of Trenton v. State of N.J., 262 U.S. 182 (U.S. 1923)
- City of Pawhuska v. Pawhuska OIL & GAS Co., 250 U.S. 394 (U.S. 1919)
- Citizens' Sav. Bank of Owensboro v. Owensboro, 173 U.S. 636 (U.S. 1899)
- Cleveland & Pittsburgh R.R. Co. v. City of Cleveland, 235 U.S. 50 (U.S. 1914)
- White River Lumber Co. v. Arkansas Ex rel. Applegate, 279 U.S. 692 (U.S. 1929)
- Miles v. Dep't of Treas. of Ind., 298 U.S. 640 (U.S. 1936)
- United States v. Belmont, 300 U.S. 641 (U.S. 1937)
- Blackman v. Stone, 300 U.S. 641 (U.S. 1937)