MILES ET AL.
v.
DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY OF INDIANA ET AL.

U.S. | 1936-04-27
No. 869
298 U.S. 640 Supreme Court of the United States (1936) Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam:_

Per Curiam:_

The appeal herein is dismissed upon the ground that the appellants have failed to show any interest entitling them to invoke the protection of the Federal Constitution. Tyler v. Judges of Court of Registration, 179 U. S. 405, 406, 407, 410; Southern Ry. Co. v. King, 217 U. S. 524, 534; Standard Stock Food Co. v. Wright, 225 U. S. 540, 550.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Keach v. McDonald, 302 U.S. 647 (U.S. 1937)
    …ant of a properly presented substantial federal question. (1) Citizens’ Savings Bank v. Owensboro, 173 U. S. 636, 643; Cleveland & Pittsburgh R. Co. v. Cleveland, 235 U. S. 50, 53; White River Co. v. Arkansas, 279 U. S. 692, 700; Collins v. Streitz, 298 U. S. 640; (2) Iowa Central Ry. Co. v. Iowa, 160 U. S. 389, 393; French v. Taylor, 199 U. S. 274, 277, 278; Hebert v. Louisiana, 272 U. S. 312, 316.…
  • South Bend v. DeHaven, 302 U.S. 644 (U.S. 1937)
    …ant of a properly presented substantial federal question. (1) Citizens’ Savings Bank v. Owensboro, 173 U. S. 636, 643; Cleveland & Pittsburgh R. Co. v. Cleveland, 235 U. S. 50, 53; White River Co. v. Arkansas, 279 U. S. 692, 700; Collins v. Streitz, 298 U. S. 640. (2) Pawhuska v. Pawhuska Oil & Gas Co., 250 U. S. 394; Trenton v. New Jersey, 262 U. S. 182; City of Holton v. Kansas State Bank, 300 U. S. 641.…
  • Toole v. Miners Sav. Bank, 302 U.S. 651 (U.S. 1937)
    …missed for the want of a properly presented federal question. Citizens’ Savings Bank v. Owensboro, 173 U. S. 636, 643; Cleveland & Pittsburgh R. Co. v. Cleveland, 235 U. S. 50, 53; White River Co. v. Arkansas, 279 U. S. 692, 700; Collins v. Streitz, 298 U. S. 640.…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw