DOBRY
v.
IOWA
DOBRY
IOWA
293 U.S. 519
Supreme Court of the United States (1934)
Per_curiam
Per Curiam:
The motion of the appellee to dismiss the appeal herein is granted, and the appeal is dismissed for the want of a properly presented federal question. Bowe v. Scott, 233 U. S. 658, 664, 665; Layton v. Missouri, 187 U. S. 356, 358, 361; Jacobi v. Alabama, 187 U. S. 133, 135; Kipley v. Illinois, 170 U. S. 182, 187; Miller v. Cornwall R. Co., 168 U. S. 131, 134; Porter v. Foley, 24 How. 415; New York ex rel. Sackett v. Lynch, 291 U. S. 652; 292 U. S. 604.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Miller v. Cornwall R.R. Co., 168 U.S. 131 (U.S. 1897)
- Layton v. Missouri, 187 U.S. 356 (U.S. 1902)
- Jacobi v. Alabama, 187 U.S. 133 (U.S. 1902)
- Kipley v. Illinois, 170 U.S. 182 (U.S. 1898)
- Bowe v. Scott, 233 U.S. 658 (U.S. 1914)
- James D. Porter and others v. Bushrod W. Foley, 24 How. 415 (U.S. 1860)
- New York ex rel. Sackett v. Lynch, 291 U.S. 652 (U.S. 1934)
- Liggett & Myers Tobacco Co. v. South Carolina, 291 U.S. 652 (U.S. 1934)
- Trinityfarm Constr. Co. v. Grosjean, 292 U.S. 604 (U.S. 1934)
- Willis v. First Real Est. & Inv. Co., 292 U.S. 604 (U.S. 1934)