WILLIS

v.

FIRST REAL ESTATE & INVESTMENT CO. ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• THE City OF Hollywood v. Davis, 154 Fla. 785 (Fla. 1944)
  …oved by the Supreme Court of Florida in many cases. The interested property owner is constitutionally entitled to but one notice. See Utley v. City of St. Petersburg, 111 Fla. 844, 149 So. 806, 292 U. S. 106, 54 S. Ct. 593, 78 L. Ed. 1155, reh. den. 292 U. S. 604, 54 S. Ct. 712, 78 L. Ed. 1466; Escott v. City of Miami, 107 Fla. 273, 144 . So. 397; Abell v. Boynton, 95 Fla. 984, 117 So. 507; Anderson v. Ocala, 67 Fla. 204, 64 So. 775, 52 L.R.A. (N.S.) 287; Crawford v. City of Decatur, 226 Ala. 418, 147 So. 61…
• Dobry v. Iowa, 293 U.S. 519 (U.S. 1934)
  …ayton v. Missouri, 187 U. S. 356, 358, 361; Jacobi v. Alabama, 187 U. S. 133, 135; Kipley v. Illinois, 170 U. S. 182, 187; Miller v. Cornwall R. Co., 168 U. S. 131, 134; Porter v. Foley, 24 How. 415; New York ex rel. Sackett v. Lynch, 291 U. S. 652; 292 U. S. 604.…