CHEWNING
v.
VIRGINIA
CHEWNING
VIRGINIA
289 U.S. 708
Supreme Court of the United States (1933)
Per_curiam
Per Curiam:
The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. State Board of Tax Commissioners v. Jackson, 283 U.S. 527, 537; Castillo v. McConnico, 168 U.S. 674, 683; Moffitt v. Kelley, 218 U.S. 400, 404, 405; Nickel v. Cole, 256 U.S. 222, 226; Glenn v. Doyall, 285 U.S. 526; Long v. Kelley, 288 U.S. 591.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- State Bd. of Tax Comm'rs of Ind. v. Jackson, 283 U.S. 527 (U.S. 1931)
- Castillo v. McCONNICO, 168 U.S. 674 (U.S. 1898)
- Nickel v. Cole, 256 U.S. 222 (U.S. 1921)
- Moffitt v. Kelly, 218 U.S. 400 (U.S. 1910)
- Ex parte Pocono Pines Assembly Hotels Co., 285 U.S. 526 (U.S. 1932)
- Am. Sur. Co. v. Greek Catholic Union, 285 U.S. 526 (U.S. 1932)
- Morrison v. California, 288 U.S. 591 (U.S. 1933)
- Long v. Kelley, 288 U.S. 591 (U.S. 1933)