MORRISON ET AL.

v.

CALIFORNIA

Citator

Cited By

• Patterson v. New York, 432 U.S. 197 (U.S. 1977)
  …y fact. In Morrison v. California, 291 U. S. 82 (1934), a state law made it illegal for an alien ineligible for citizenship to own or possess land. Initially, in a summary dismissal for want of a substantial federal question, Morrison v. California, 288 U. S. 591 (1933), the Court held that it did not violate the Due Process Clause for the State to place on the defendant “the burden of proving citizenship as a defense,” 291 U. S., at 88, once the State’s evidence had shown that the defendant possessed the la…
• Morrison v. California, 291 U.S. 82 (U.S. 1934)
  …convicted. There is nothing in the statute whereby unlawful occupation of land by an alien ineligible for citizenship is declared to be a crime unless the occupation has been acquired by force of a conspiracy. This court in Morrison v. California, 288 U.S. 591,2 passed upon a controversy as to the validity of § 9b of the California Land. Law, which, though akin to § 9a, has important elements of difference. This section (9b) provides in substance that when it has,,been proved that the defendant has been i…
• Chewning v. Virginia, 289 U.S. 708 (U.S. 1933)
  …federal question. State Board of Tax Commissioners v. Jackson, 283 U.S. 527, 537; Castillo v. McConnico, 168 U.S. 674, 683; Moffitt v. Kelley, 218 U.S. 400, 404, 405; Nickel v. Cole, 256 U.S. 222, 226; Glenn v. Doyall, 285 U.S. 526; Long v. Kelley, 288 U.S. 591.…

Authorities Cited

• Yee Hem v. The United States, 268 U.S. 178 (U.S. 1925)
• Mobile v. Turnipseed, 219 U.S. 35 (U.S. 1910)
• Patsone v. Commonwealth of Pa., 232 U.S. 138 (U.S. 1914)
• Atl. Coast Line R. Co. v. Ford, 287 U.S. 502 (U.S. 1933)
• Porterfield v. Webb, 263 U.S. 225 (U.S. 1923)
• Cockrill v. People of California, 268 U.S. 258 (U.S. 1925)