UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
v.
CARMELINA VERA ROJAS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT

11th Cir. | 2011-10-04
No. 10-14662
BEFORE: DUBINA, Chief Judge, TJOFLAT, EDMONDSON, CARNES, BARKETT, HULL, MARCUS, WILSON, PRYOR and MARTIN, Circuit Judges.
659 F.3d 1055 Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit (2011) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
BY THE COURT:

BY THE COURT: A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on whether this case should be reheard by the Court sitting en banc, and a majority of the judges in this Court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc, IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this Court en banc. The previous panel’s opinion is hereby VACATED.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • United States v. Hudson, 685 F.3d 1260 (11th Cir. 2012)
    …BY THE COURT: We previously vacated the panels’ opinions to rehear these appeals en banc. United States v. Rojas, 659 F. 3d 1055 (11th Cir.2011); United States v. Hudson, 659 F. 3d 1056 (11th Cir.2011). The issue before us in both cases was whether the Fair Sentencing Act of 2010, which raised the quantities of crack cocaine required to trigger mandatory-minimum penalties und…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw