R.E.P. AND D.M.S.
v.
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF LAW ENFORCEMENT, GLASS
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Appellants may bring an action under section 790.33(3)(f) in circuit court without exhausting administrative remedies.
[1] A party seeking relief under section 790.33(3)(f) may bring an action in circuit court without first exhausting administrative remedies.
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“Because the relief authorized by section 790.33(3)(f)1. is the remedy in this case, Pretzer could bring an action under section 790.33(3)(f) in circuit court without exhausting any administrative remedies.”
Court's rationale for affirming the administrative decision
R.E.P. and D.M.S. appealed from a decision of the Division of Administrative Hearings regarding the Florida Department of Law Enforcement and Mark Gla…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Jurisdiction Of Circuit Court cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See Pretzer v. Swearingen, 394 So. 3d 175, 192 (Fla. 1st DCA 2024) (“Because the relief authorized by section 790.33(3)(f)1. is the remedy in this case, Pretzer could bring an action under section 790.33(3)(f) in circuit court without exhausting any administrative remedies.” (emphasis in original)). OSTERHAUS, C.J., and RAY and LONG, JJ., concur. _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.
_____________________________
Eric J. Friday of Kingry & Friday, PLLC, Jacksonville, for Appellants.
James Uthmeier, Attorney General, Natalie A. Bielby Senior Assistant Attorney General, and James P. Waczewski, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellees.
2
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
R.E.P. and D.M.S. v. Fla. Dep't of Law Enf't, 394 So. 3d 175 (Fla. 1st DCA 2025)
-
R.E.P. and D.M.S. v. Dep't of Agric. & Consumer Servs. & Wilton Simpson (Fla. 1st DCA 2025)…LTON SIMPSON, Appellees. _____________________________ On appeal from the Division of Administrative Hearings. James H. Peterson, III, Administrative Law Judge. January 29, 2025 PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. See Pretzer v. Swearingen, 394 So. 3d 175, 192 (Fla. 1st DCA 2024) (“Because the relief authorized by section 790.33(3)(f)1. is the remedy in this case, Pretzer could bring an action under section 790.33(3)(f) in circuit court without exhausting any administrative remedies.” (Emphasis i…
-
Harrison v. Dep't of Mgmt. Servs. (Fla. 1st DCA 2025)…er than [] courts” vested with sovereign judicial power). This concept—relationship between public rights and sovereign immunity—is not identical to the sometimes-judicially mandated exhaustion of administrative remedies. See Pretzer v. Swearingen, 394 So. 3d 175, 192–94 (Fla. 1st DCA 2024) (Tanenbaum, J., concurring) (explaining how the two concepts relate and differ). Regardless of whether the appellant pursued remedies administratively, he still cannot sue the department in the judicial branch for benefit…
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- R.E.P. and D.M.S. v. Fla. Dep't of Law Enf't, 394 So. 3d 175 (Fla. 1st DCA 2025)