SHARP INSURANCE AGENCY, INC.
v.
SOLEX INVESTMENTS, LLC
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Financial information is subject to discovery if it is relevant to the lawsuit, notwithstanding Article I, section 23 of the Florida Constitution's protection of financial privacy.
[1] Financial information otherwise protected by Article I, section 23 of the Florida Constitution may be discovered if relevant to the issues in the litigation.
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“Financial information may be produced, however, if it is relevant to the lawsuit.”
Articulating the exception to constitutional financial privacy protection
Sharp Insurance Agency petitioned for a writ of certiorari challenging a circuit court order requiring disclosure of financial information in a lawsui…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Florida Constitution Article I, Section 23 (Right Of Privacy) cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Petition denied. See Borck v. Borck, 906 So. 2d 1209, 1211 (Fla. 4th
DCA 2005) (“Article I, section 23, of the Florida Constitution protects the financial information of persons if there is no relevant or compelling reason to compel disclosure.”); Shojaee v. Anibal J. Duarte-Viera, P.A., 365 So. 3d
1184, 1187 (Fla. 3d DCA 2023) (“Financial information may be produced,
however, if it is relevant to the lawsuit.”); Elsner v. E-Commerce Coffee Club,
126 So. 3d 1261, 1263 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013) (“While the potential invasion of privacy may provide a threshold showing of irreparable harm, certiorari may be granted only where the petitioner ‘affirmatively establishe[s]’ that the financial information is irrelevant to any issue in the litigation and not likely to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence.” (citations omitted)).
Petition denied.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Sharp Ins. Agency, Inc. v. Solex Invs., LLC, 365 So. 3d 1184 (Fla. 3d DCA 2025)…So. 2d 1209, 1211 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005) (“Article I, section 23, of the Florida Constitution protects the financial information of persons if there is no relevant or compelling reason to compel disclosure.”); Shojaee v. Anibal J. Duarte-Viera, P.A., 365 So. 3d 1184, 1187 (Fla. 3d DCA 2023) (“Financial information may be produced, however, if it is relevant to the lawsuit.”); Elsner v. E-Commerce Coffee Club, 126 So. 3d 1261, 1263 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013) (“While the potential invasion of privacy may provide a thres…
Authorities Cited
- Elsner v. E-Commerce Coffee Club, 126 So. 3d 1261 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013)
- Borck v. Abbie S. Borck, 906 So. 2d 1209 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005)
- Sharp Ins. Agency, Inc. v. Solex Invs., LLC, 365 So. 3d 1184 (Fla. 3d DCA 2025)