SAUL AUGUSTO OJEDA EGUI
v.
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, CHILD SUPPORT PROGRAM
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Third District Court of Appeal affirmed the Department of Revenue's child support determination against Saul Augusto Ojeda Egui, holding that by failing to request an administrative hearing, he waived his right to challenge the sufficiency of evidence supporting the child support obligation.
By failing to request an administrative hearing and thereby waiving his right to a hearing, Ojeda Egui waived his ability to challenge the sufficiency of the evidence supporting the Department's determination of his child support obligations.
[1] Failure to request an administrative hearing in child support proceedings constitutes a waiver of the right to challenge the sufficiency of evidence supporting the Depart…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“Although the Father provided his financial information to the Department, he did not request an administrative hearing and therefore failed to fully participate in the proceedings below. By waiving his right to a hearing, the Father waived his ability to challenge the sufficiency of the evidence to support the Department's determination of his child support obligations.”
Establishes that failure to request an administrative hearing waives the right to challenge evidentiary sufficiency of child support determinations.
Previewing 1 of 2 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceOjeda Egui provided financial information to the Department of Revenue, Child Support Program, but did not request an administrative hearing. The Depa…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Disestablishment Of Paternity cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Chavez v. Dep’t of Revenue, Child Support Program, 49 Fla. L. Weekly D1756, D1756 (Fla. 3d DCA Aug. 21, 2024) (“Although the Father provided his financial information to the Department, he did not request an administrative hearing and therefore failed to fully participate in the proceedings below. By waiving his right to a hearing, the Father waived his ability to challenge the sufficiency of the evidence to support the Department's determination of his child support obligations.”); see also § 742.10(4), Fla. Stat. (2024) (“[A] signed voluntary acknowledgment of paternity shall constitute an establishment of paternity and may be challenged in court only on the basis of fraud, duress, or material mistake of fact, with the burden of proof upon the challenger . . . .”); § 742.18(1), Fla. Stat. (2024) (“[E]stablish[ing] circumstances under which a male may disestablish paternity or terminate a child support obligation when the male is not the biological father of the child.”).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Egui v. Dep't of Revenue, 49 Fla. L. Weekly D1756 (Fla. 3d DCA 2024)
Authorities Cited
- Egui v. Dep't of Revenue, 49 Fla. L. Weekly D1756 (Fla. 3d DCA 2024)