ROBERT TERRY BOND
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
An award of investigative costs must be supported by evidence that the costs were requested on the record and that the defendant affirmatively agreed to pay the requested amount.
[1] Investigative costs must be supported by a showing that such costs were requested on the record and that the defendant affirmatively agreed to pay the requested amount.
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“We reverse the award of $50 for investigative costs because there was no showing that the costs were 'requested on the record' by the Vero Beach Police Department. Appellant did not 'affirmatively agree[]' to pay the requested amount.”
The court's explanation for reversing the investigative cost award.
Robert Terry Bond was convicted in the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Indian River County, and sentenced. The trial court imposed …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Investigative Costs cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the judgment and sentence in all respects but one. We reverse the award of $50 for investigative costs because there was no showing that the costs were “requested on the record” by the Vero Beach Police Department. Lippwe v. State, 152 So. 3d 782, 783 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014). Appellant did not “affirmatively agree[]” to pay the requested amount. Icon v. State, 322 So. 3d 117, 119 (Fla. 4th DCA 2021).
We reverse and remand for the trial court to strike the $50 investigative cost with instructions that the court may reimpose that cost if sufficient evidence to support the cost is provided. Ray v. State, 383 So. 3d 513, 516 (Fla. 4th DCA 2024).
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded. GROSS, CIKLIN and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.
2
* * * Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Bond v. State, 383 So. 3d 513 (Fla. 4th DCA 2024)…, 322 So. 3d 117, 119 (Fla. 4th DCA 2021). We reverse and remand for the trial court to strike the $50 investigative cost with instructions that the court may reimpose that cost if sufficient evidence to support the cost is provided. Ray v. State, 383 So. 3d 513, 516 (Fla. 4th DCA 2024). Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded. GROSS, CIKLIN and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.…
-
Peterson v. State (Fla. 4th DCA 2024)
Authorities Cited
- Icon v. State, 322 So. 3d 117 (Fla. 4th DCA 2021)
- Everly Scott Lippwe v. State, 152 So. 3d 782 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014)
- Bond v. State, 383 So. 3d 513 (Fla. 4th DCA 2024)